|
|
New impeachment scam thread. Nice people only.
 Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-11-18 13:36:29
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »How quickly things change. No way in hell does Warren or Sanders win moderates. Mayor Pete maybe but even thats reaching.
Oh yeah dems turn on their own pretty quick.
Left attacks Obama for to far left comment
Trump wins another term while dems implode. Obama was their posted boy and messiah. I never thought I'd see this.
How does this relate to the impeachment inquiry?
The Senators Warren and Sanders would be involved in the Impeachment Vote in the Senate, so it relates! XD
Well, that isn't quite relating to the impeachment inquiry. I would just hate to see Nausi get upset that his thread gets pulled because the it is really just another RP&R under the guise of a different title. How nice of you to remove my quotes of doing the aerobics for giggles. I agreed with you even. Tsk tsk.
He does it all time. Ozment 101.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-11-18 13:38:36
There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached.
Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone.
Too bad we know the military aid was withheld, and we know Trump was demanding investigations into his political opponent. So much for "hearsay."
If it was that easy, Schiff wouldn't be playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon with his star witnesses.
By fonewear 2019-11-18 13:39:26
There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached.
Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone.
Too bad we know the military aid was withheld, and we know Trump was demanding investigations into his political opponent. So much for "hearsay."
Vic with the spicy take:
YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Carbuncle.Skulloneix
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15018
By Carbuncle.Skulloneix 2019-11-18 13:40:11
There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached.
Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
[+]
Ragnarok.Ozment
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1119
By Ragnarok.Ozment 2019-11-18 13:46:48
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »How quickly things change. No way in hell does Warren or Sanders win moderates. Mayor Pete maybe but even thats reaching.
Oh yeah dems turn on their own pretty quick.
Left attacks Obama for to far left comment
Trump wins another term while dems implode. Obama was their posted boy and messiah. I never thought I'd see this.
How does this relate to the impeachment inquiry?
The Senators Warren and Sanders would be involved in the Impeachment Vote in the Senate, so it relates! XD
Well, that isn't quite relating to the impeachment inquiry. I would just hate to see Nausi get upset that his thread gets pulled because the it is really just another RP&R under the guise of a different title. How nice of you to remove my quotes of doing the aerobics for giggles. I agreed with you even. Tsk tsk.
Ozment 101.
:D
By Nausi 2019-11-18 13:47:23
Ah, the impeachment motives have now become clear.
RGB is in the hospital undergoing ”ROUTINE EMERGENCY SURGERY”.
Can you even imagine approving such a ridiculous headline?
Motives are now clear, delegitimize the next SJC pick. Throw anything up against the wall.
By Viciouss 2019-11-18 13:54:12
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached. Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
There are 3 witnesses scheduled to testify this week that were on the GOP witness list. Some of the others on the list were denied because they did not check the relevance box.
Ragnarok.Ozment
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1119
By Ragnarok.Ozment 2019-11-18 13:57:14
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »Show me some evidence of corruption. Remember, the Ukrainians themselves have said Hunter Biden did nothing wrong, and its not a crime to be on a board of a company. Use that same standard you protect Biden's son with for Trump.
I don't see or believe he did anything wrong, and the Burden of Proof should be equal for both.
But how we have it, Republican side has valid point to look into? Majority of Media ignores it and disproves it. Democrat side has valid point to look into? Well lets run that 4 weeks on end, and let's let a Congressman LIE about what the transcript says, to rile up the people.
For God's sake, be objective. I am being objective about Biden.
Uh, what? When this started, Rav asked me what I thought about this whole thing, and I said it completely depends on the money. If Trump blocked the aid because he wanted an investigation into the Bidens, thats an abuse of power. And the fact that the money had been blocked for months gave Congress a legitimate reason to investigate why. Now, we do know he did block the money for that exact reason.Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »Now, we do know he did block the money for that exact reason. No, WE don't. We the people, speculate and are investigating that now. Currently it's a partisan run attempt.
This "WE" you keep mentioning, does not exist. Look how many people here don't agree with that.
How nice of you to remove Vic's quotes. Tsk tsk.
By Nausi 2019-11-18 13:57:41
Graham says Schiff will he called as a witness if the hearing ever makes it to the senate.
[+]
By Viciouss 2019-11-18 13:59:23
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached. Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
There are 3 witnesses scheduled to testify this week that were on the GOP witness list. Some of the others on the list were denied because they did not check the relevance box.
Actually, I should clarify, no one on the GOP witness list has officially been denied. But I think its safe to say we won't be hearing from their entire list.
By Viciouss 2019-11-18 14:00:29
Graham says Schiff will he called as a witness if the hearing ever makes it to the senate.
Its a real shame Graham doesn't understand the rules of the Senate trial.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-11-18 14:02:34
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached. Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
There are 3 witnesses scheduled to testify this week that were on the GOP witness list. Some of the others on the list were denied because they did not check the relevance box.
I'm not sure anyone could be less relevant than the witnesses the Dems have called so far. They all knew a guy who knew a guy who saw a thing on the news.
By Eboneezer 2019-11-18 14:14:02
There are none so blind as those who refuse to see.
...what my neighbor's friend's son-in-law's younger sister said she saw.
Or at least that's how it would relate to 100% of this impeachment inquiry's testimony thus far.
By fonewear 2019-11-18 15:28:36
There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached.
Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone.
Too bad we know the military aid was withheld, and we know Trump was demanding investigations into his political opponent. So much for "hearsay."
If it was that easy, Schiff wouldn't be playing Six Degrees of Kevin Bacon with his star witnesses.
What is crazy about that is if it works with Kevin Bacon...it works with Vic.
Carbuncle.Skulloneix
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15018
By Carbuncle.Skulloneix 2019-11-18 15:29:36
How nice of you to remove Vic's quotes. Tsk tsk. To truncate it. I never removed specific sentences that matter.
Quotes get long man.
[+]
Carbuncle.Skulloneix
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15018
By Carbuncle.Skulloneix 2019-11-18 15:32:43
I'm not sure anyone could be less relevant than the witnesses the Dems have called so far. They all knew a guy who knew a guy who saw a thing on the news. Agreed. And if I was in charge of Senate Portion, I'd tell the Representative side to be fair or no dice for the Senate portion. Both sides should be heard.
"but Hunter Biden isn't important" yah well neither are these sock puppet witnesses so far. Lord knows we have enough Sock Puppets.
By fonewear 2019-11-18 15:33:46
I have third hand knowledge that Trump is finished. It's a pretty big deal.
By fonewear 2019-11-18 15:35:46
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached. Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
There are 3 witnesses scheduled to testify this week that were on the GOP witness list. Some of the others on the list were denied because they did not check the relevance box.
I'm not sure anyone could be less relevant than the witnesses the Dems have called so far. They all knew a guy who knew a guy who saw a thing on the news.
I know a guy that knows a guy that was in the Mafia and he told me "you ain't see nothing"
I said hey oh go get your shine box you greasy *** !
[+]
Carbuncle.Skulloneix
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15018
By Carbuncle.Skulloneix 2019-11-18 15:37:48
What is crazy about that is if it works with Kevin Bacon... Yo Fone, I'ma let you finish, but this meme best describes this impeachment debate....OF ALL TIME!
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-11-18 15:39:37
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached. Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
There are 3 witnesses scheduled to testify this week that were on the GOP witness list. Some of the others on the list were denied because they did not check the relevance box.
I'm not sure anyone could be less relevant than the witnesses the Dems have called so far. They all knew a guy who knew a guy who saw a thing on the news.
I know a guy that knows a guy that was in the Mafia and he told me "you ain't see nothing"
I said hey oh go get your shine box you greasy *** !
Ah, the shine box. That's my favorite scene from Home Alone.
By fonewear 2019-11-18 15:41:12
Where is the impeachment inquiry ?
YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
Ragnarok.Ozment
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1119
By Ragnarok.Ozment 2019-11-18 15:51:29
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »How nice of you to remove Vic's quotes. Tsk tsk. To truncate it. I never removed specific sentences that matter.
Quotes get long man.
Exactly! I truncate too, but do not remove specific sentences that matter. Everyone does it, because quotes get long. As long as your not a Rava and inserting things in that were never said.
By fonewear 2019-11-18 15:53:55
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached. Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
There are 3 witnesses scheduled to testify this week that were on the GOP witness list. Some of the others on the list were denied because they did not check the relevance box.
I'm not sure anyone could be less relevant than the witnesses the Dems have called so far. They all knew a guy who knew a guy who saw a thing on the news.
I know a guy that knows a guy that was in the Mafia and he told me "you ain't see nothing"
Some *** is changing my quotes to not reflect what I really think. I demand action !
By fonewear 2019-11-18 15:55:59
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »There hasn't been any of that fabled exculpatory evidence brought forward, so there is no reason to believe its not going to the Senate. Trump is going to be impeached. Exculpatory evidence isn't needed if your case is 100% hearsay. Impeach all you want, this is super dead on the Senate based on the merits of the case alone. Did the Republicans get any witnesses they wanted? I haven't been following as much, its too crazy of a thing and I like not being pissed off at a rigged system against the President, but I heard something that Republicans wanted to call witnesses but Pencil Neck Schiff said no. That a thing?
Non Democrat Replies only. Clearly we have "quote" glitching.
There are 3 witnesses scheduled to testify this week that were on the GOP witness list. Some of the others on the list were denied because they did not check the relevance box.
I checked the relevance box it is currently empty.
Carbuncle.Skulloneix
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15018
By Carbuncle.Skulloneix 2019-11-18 16:00:47
Exactly! I truncate too, but do not remove specific sentences that matter. Everyone does it, because quotes get long. As long as your not a Rava and inserting things in that were never said. DUDE. You removed a part of me joking about my response. Then responded to part you left.
Next time you want to dig thru posts, go see if you can find Vic's post about answering a very specific question. As far as I know, he never answered them and dodged it. He could have answered while I was on my breaks.
Now enough of your diversion from being wrong in this thread. This isn't relevant.
[+]
By Viciouss 2019-11-18 16:03:32
[+]
Carbuncle.Skulloneix
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15018
By Carbuncle.Skulloneix 2019-11-18 16:03:43
Back on track, so I think I saw a snippet of some Democrat asking the former Ambassador, or whatever, "how Trumps attacks make her feel?" (paraphrased), and it sounded like a therapy session. Damn, this is what goes on now?
Back in my day, Ambassadors feared coming back in body bags. These proceedings are a gawd damn joke.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2019-11-18 16:05:37
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »Exactly! I truncate too, but do not remove specific sentences that matter. Everyone does it, because quotes get long. As long as your not a Rava and inserting things in that were never said. DUDE. You removed a part of me joking about my response. Then responded to part you left.
Next time you want to dig thru posts, go see if you can find Vic's post about answering a very specific question. As far as I know, he never answered them and dodged it. He could have answered while I was on my breaks.
Now enough of your diversion from being wrong in this thread. This isn't relevant.
Is he still going on about that? I did it one as a joke to make a point and he's still crying about it.
(Hold up, gotta tie this into the thread topic somehow....)
.... Which sounds a lot like Democrats do when Trump does a thing and they respond a certain way! And impeachment and stuff!
(Nailed it.)
Ragnarok.Ozment
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1119
By Ragnarok.Ozment 2019-11-18 16:19:33
Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: »Exactly! I truncate too, but do not remove specific sentences that matter. Everyone does it, because quotes get long. As long as your not a Rava and inserting things in that were never said. DUDE. You removed a part of me joking about my response. Then responded to part you left.
Next time you want to dig thru posts, go see if you can find Vic's post about answering a very specific question. As far as I know, he never answered them and dodged it. He could have answered while I was on my breaks.
Now enough of your diversion from being wrong in this thread. This isn't relevant.
Not wrong at all, you just got caught being a hypocrite and are trying to back peddle your way out. Now move on and try to stay on topic. This thread is about the impeachment inquiry, make sure your posts are about that.
Welp Rp&r is shut down but p&r is not. So i offer a specific challenge to all my fellow gamers.
Impeachment is a scam. Change my mind.
Rep Swallwell just openly said Trump needs to prove his innocence, that isn’t how our system of laws works.
Secondly, Trump has already proven his innocence, he released the transcript, which shows no hint of misconduct.
|
|
