|
15 questions for the evolutionists of AH.com
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 14:16:37
A girl in 9th grade had a random orgasm out of nowhere in class Uh..? Maybe she was doing something. Unless she suffered from PSAS. She kinda just slithered out of her chair onto the ground afterwards if that is a symptom. She wasn't doing anything as far as I could see.
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2014-09-22 14:17:32
how do you feel about men who stare at tid ol biddy cleavage? There is no harm in taking a look. Everyone with a sexual interest does it, including women(but women are 100 times better than men at being discrete when they check out someone). Actually, being looked at is often appreciated too.
The problem is staring. Staring at somneone causes uneasiness by itself, when the stare is sexual in nature too that's obviuosly even more bothersome.
Even worse when this happens while trying to have a conversation. If you are so distracted by my boobs that you can't even look away I'll think you're a beta male who's not in control and deem you bad mate material. You will then be able to stare at my *** instead as I walk away and ignore you the rest of my life.
Keep in mind also that women get this a lot, like everyday all the time. So eventually it becomes frustrating. I know a lot of women that are attracted to the Beta - a lot of them fuggin gorgeous too. I've been rejected by some of them and I AM PRIME! Then seen them get with the some dude with the worst hygiene, a high pitched voice, sagging man tiddies and hair growing from his chest outside his shirt's collar. /shrugg.
anyways, i brought it up with the context of feminism extremes - as we men are programed to appreciate big breasts and silky smooth long legs. I don't even realize I'm staring half the time until I get slapped or poked. And I am by no means a Beta.
- IQ check
- Looks check
- Income check
- Flashy car check
- Penis size decent enough
- Physical dominance check
- Respect of my peers check
- Have an entourage check
- funny Nope.
Women always go for the funny guy most. Alpha's stand no chance against a guy who makes girls laugh. He can smell like cow ***and have the personal hygiene of a baboon, but if he makes them laugh enough, he gets them. They're not just betas, they're betas provider as they're called.
This isn't valid for all girls of course, it's just an example of those girls:
They're gorgeous so they enjoy their attractiveness to the max. They spend most of their late teens and 20s doing whatever they want sexually, they're usually women who have children when completely single and an "ok" job at best, but not all do have children, some just enjoy sex or flirting, whatever.
Then they realize they're 30, they are out of their prime both physically and in term of career and they are faced with reality: they want children and a stable situation. What do they do? They look for beta providers who will say amen to whatever they want as long as he gets to have that fine looking girl with him.
Some people actually believe that all girls are like that, which is a bit scary. But the whole thing makes sense for a certain female population. If you aim for the gorgeous girls that are well in their 20s, this may be the reason.
Also, from experience, I remember a 9/10 latina girl who one day told me she wanted to be with a guy who was nerdy and autistic. But these women are usually after an utopia, and the day they're faced with a real autistic guy they run away. Fantasies etc.
[+]
By fonewear 2014-09-22 14:26:01
That is how you get me to pay attention in Science class.
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2014-09-22 14:26:04
You guys put too much emphasis on the definition. A word is only a mean to communicate, when I say alpha it doesn't mean there are only two types of men.
It's a different thing entirely. It's about the way you face the various situations.
Someone who (a) believes they're in a race; and (b) thinks they're winning. This for example, has nothing to do with what I was talking about. At all.
Additionally, a guy who is a complete *** is not an alpha. Alpha men can be romantic and passionate as well. By alpha you mean confident.
I remember going to a certain part of internet that shall not be named where men usually lament on their flaws. "my *** is small, I'm short, I'm skinny, I'm fat" and so on. And sometimes, women come around and actually give them proper advices to git gud with women.
The main advice is very simple: stop crying.
We all have flaws, but if you do not let them weigh you down, you'll be able to live and get more than you'd expect.
I know that I'm not alpha myself, but I'm not beta either. I don't really understand the necessity to label myself.
[+]
By fonewear 2014-09-22 14:27:20
Not alpha not beta aim to be Omega. Then you have to pledge Sigma Pi.
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 14:30:19
By fonewear 2014-09-22 14:31:45
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2014-09-22 14:34:54
Just lost my job thanks to that child porn, thanks Fone.
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 14:36:28
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Just lost my job thanks to that child porn, thanks Fone. You didn't loose your job for browsing at work?
By Blazed1979 2014-09-22 14:40:29
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »how do you feel about men who stare at tid ol biddy cleavage? There is no harm in taking a look. Everyone with a sexual interest does it, including women(but women are 100 times better than men at being discrete when they check out someone). Actually, being looked at is often appreciated too.
The problem is staring. Staring at somneone causes uneasiness by itself, when the stare is sexual in nature too that's obviuosly even more bothersome.
Even worse when this happens while trying to have a conversation. If you are so distracted by my boobs that you can't even look away I'll think you're a beta male who's not in control and deem you bad mate material. You will then be able to stare at my *** instead as I walk away and ignore you the rest of my life.
Keep in mind also that women get this a lot, like everyday all the time. So eventually it becomes frustrating. I know a lot of women that are attracted to the Beta - a lot of them fuggin gorgeous too. I've been rejected by some of them and I AM PRIME! Then seen them get with the some dude with the worst hygiene, a high pitched voice, sagging man tiddies and hair growing from his chest outside his shirt's collar. /shrugg.
anyways, i brought it up with the context of feminism extremes - as we men are programed to appreciate big breasts and silky smooth long legs. I don't even realize I'm staring half the time until I get slapped or poked. And I am by no means a Beta.
- IQ check
- Looks check
- Income check
- Flashy car check
- Penis size decent enough
- Physical dominance check
- Respect of my peers check
- Have an entourage check
- funny Nope.
Women always go for the funny guy most. Alpha's stand no chance against a guy who makes girls laugh. He can smell like cow ***and have the personal hygiene of a baboon, but if he makes them laugh enough, he gets them. They're not just betas, they're betas provider as they're called.
This isn't valid for all girls of course, it's just an example of those girls:
They're gorgeous so they enjoy their attractiveness to the max. They spend most of their late teens and 20s doing whatever they want sexually, they're usually women who have children when completely single and an "ok" job at best, but not all do have children, some just enjoy sex or flirting, whatever.
Then they realize they're 30, they are out of their prime both physically and in term of career and they are faced with reality: they want children and a stable situation. What do they do? They look for beta providers who will say amen to whatever they want as long as he gets to have that fine looking girl with him.
Some people actually believe that all girls are like that, which is a bit scary. But the whole thing makes sense for a certain female population. If you aim for the gorgeous girls that are well in their 20s, this may be the reason.
Also, from experience, I remember a 9/10 latina girl who one day told me she wanted to be with a guy who was nerdy and autistic. But these women are usually after an utopia, and the day they're faced with a real autistic guy they run away. Fantasies etc.
I've seen this play out. Just last week this incredibly hot one at my ex-job went through just about every senior who earned more than x- amount posted on her facebook "i want to find a hubby and just cuddle" - the replies on her facebook were pretty ugly.
At 30, the game changes - Hollywood would have you think men continue to chase women for the rest of their lives. At 30-35, there's so much accessible puntah you stop noticing or giving a f_ck.
By fonewear 2014-09-22 14:41:57
Have you guys see the origin of the *** was fat ? It is pretty freaking hilarious.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2014-09-22 14:42:28
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
By Nazrious 2014-09-22 14:48:25
Often a Atheist is the most vocal and staunchest supporter of their beliefs I disagree. I've never had atheists come bother me to talk to me about the non existence of God.
It happens almost on a daily bases with theists.
Nah they are smarter about it and lobby/ bribe congress and also run PR campaign as well as make test cases hoping to get before the Supreme Court.
Reality?
Are people upset about that fact that belief there IS NOT A GOD(S). Is not the same as a lack of belief? One would be Atheism the other would be more similar to Agnosticism.
Its not my fault if people use terms they don't fully understand.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13622
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-09-22 14:59:15
Good to see this thread didn't get any better since I left.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-09-22 15:05:23
Good to see this thread didn't get any better since I left. What did you expect judging by the OP alone?
[+]
By Nazrious 2014-09-22 15:07:11
There was some feminism fun, but you missed it.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-09-22 15:07:34
That is how you get me to pay attention in Science class. Meh.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-09-22 15:08:04
There was some feminism fun, but you missed it. Creationism leading into feminism, damn!
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-09-22 15:08:27
Often a Atheist is the most vocal and staunchest supporter of their beliefs I disagree. I've never had atheists come bother me to talk to me about the non existence of God.
It happens almost on a daily bases with theists.
Nah they are smarter about it and lobby/ bribe congress and also run PR campaign as well as make test cases hoping to get before the Supreme Court.
Reality?
Are people upset about that fact that belief there IS NOT A GOD(S). Is not the same as a lack of belief? One would be Atheism the other would be more similar to Agnosticism.
Its not my fault if people use terms they don't fully understand. You know, the nice thing about lobbying is that there is always a paper trail. Why not show your assertion of the above claim?
It's not my fault if you use terms you don't fully understand either.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13622
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-09-22 15:17:50
Good to see this thread didn't get any better since I left. What did you expect judging by the OP alone?
Pretty much what we got, I guess. I think I actually miss talking about U.S. politics now. All this religion and middle east stuff is getting repetitive and tedious to debate.
[+]
VIP
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-09-22 15:22:26
Good to see this thread didn't get any better since I left.
I think anyone who had something to actually say did it by the end of page 2. Some people like to rattle cages, others like to rattle people that like to rattle cages.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13622
By Bahamut.Ravael 2014-09-22 15:27:19
Good to see this thread didn't get any better since I left.
I think anyone who had something to actually say did it by the end of page 2. Some people like to rattle cages, others like to rattle people that like to rattle cages.
And then there are the people that think they can actually "win" a debate about religion. Hasn't Congress done something stupid lately that we can talk about?
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-09-22 15:27:32
Good to see this thread didn't get any better since I left. What did you expect judging by the OP alone?
Pretty much what we got, I guess. I think I actually miss talking about U.S. politics now. All this religion and middle east stuff is getting repetitive and tedious to debate. Global Warming is a Hoax made by the Al Gore coalition.
Discuss.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-09-22 15:28:07
Good to see this thread didn't get any better since I left.
I think anyone who had something to actually say did it by the end of page 2. Some people like to rattle cages, others like to rattle people that like to rattle cages.
And then there are the people that think they can actually "win" a debate about religion. Hasn't Congress done something stupid lately that we can talk about? In order for Congress to do something stupid, they would have to do something in the first place....
[+]
Asura.Ccl
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1995
By Asura.Ccl 2014-09-22 15:44:00
I missed 8 page, can anyone tldr those 8 pages ? Only thing I noticed is a woman ***.
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2014-09-22 15:46:27
I missed 8 page, can anyone tldr those 8 pages ? Only thing I noticed is a woman ***. God created forums.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-09-22 15:53:27
I missed 8 page, can anyone tldr those 8 pages ? Only thing I noticed is a woman ***. God I created forums. ftfy...unless you consider Scragg as a god.....
................
...................................................
.........................................................................................hmmm..........
ALL PRAISE THE ALMIGHTY SCRAGG, TRUTH BE DONE, BANS BE GONE!
By Jetackuu 2014-09-22 15:56:55
Often a Atheist is the most vocal and staunchest supporter of their beliefs I disagree. I've never had atheists come bother me to talk to me about the non existence of God.
It happens almost on a daily bases with theists.
Nah they are smarter about it and lobby/ bribe congress and also run PR campaign as well as make test cases hoping to get before the Supreme Court. Reality?
Are people upset about that fact that belief there IS NOT A GOD(S). Is not the same as a lack of belief? One would be Atheism the other would be more similar to Agnosticism.
Its not my fault if people use terms they don't fully understand.
Maybe your perception of reality, but that's not actual reality. What you think is an atheist is actually a gnostic atheist, a very small subset that is often misused as the common definition because religious persons prefer to define them as that because it discredits them. Agnosticism has nothing to do with belief or lack thereof it's a position of knowledge.
But your bias is showing.
1.) How did life originate? Evolutionist Professor Paul Davies admitted, “Nobody knows how a mixture of lifeless chemicals spontaneously organized themselves into the first living cell.”1 Andrew Knoll, professor of biology, Harvard, said, “we don’t really know how life originated on this planet”.2 A minimal cell needs several hundred proteins. Even if every atom in the universe were an experiment with all the correct amino acids present for every possible molecular vibration in the supposed evolutionary age of the universe, not even one average-sized functional protein would form. So how did life with hundreds of proteins originate just by chemistry without intelligent design?
2.) How did the DNA code originate? The code is a sophisticated language system with letters and words where the meaning of the words is unrelated to the chemical properties of the letters—just as the information on this page is not a product of the chemical properties of the ink (or pixels on a screen). What other coding system has existed without intelligent design? How did the DNA coding system arise without it being created?
3.) How could mutations—accidental copying mistakes (DNA ‘letters’ exchanged, deleted or added, genes duplicated, chromosome inversions, etc.)—create the huge volumes of information in the DNA of living things? How could such errors create 3 billion letters of DNA information to change a microbe into a microbiologist? There is information for how to make proteins but also for controlling their use—much like a cookbook contains the ingredients as well as the instructions for how and when to use them. One without the other is useless. See: Meta-information: An impossible conundrum for evolution. Mutations are known for their destructive effects, including over 1,000 human diseases such as hemophilia. Rarely are they even helpful. But how can scrambling existing DNA information create a new biochemical pathway or nano-machines with many components, to make ‘goo-to-you’ evolution possible? E.g., How did a 32-component rotary motor like ATP synthase (which produces the energy currency, ATP, for all life), or robots like kinesin (a ‘postman’ delivering parcels inside cells) originate?
4.) Why is natural selection, a principle recognized by creationists, taught as ‘evolution’, as if it explains the origin of the diversity of life? By definition it is a selective process (selecting from already existing information), so is not a creative process. It might explain the survival of the fittest (why certain genes benefit creatures more in certain environments), but not the arrival of the fittest (where the genes and creatures came from in the first place). The death of individuals not adapted to an environment and the survival of those that are suited does not explain the origin of the traits that make an organism adapted to an environment. E.g., how do minor back-and-forth variations in finch beaks explain the origin of beaks or finches? How does natural selection explain goo-to-you evolution?
5.) How did new biochemical pathways, which involve multiple enzymes working together in sequence, originate? (This video simply explains the concept of a short biochemical pathway.) Every pathway and nano-machine requires multiple protein/enzyme components to work. How did lucky accidents create even one of the components, let alone 10 or 20 or 30 at the same time, often in a necessary programmed sequence. Evolutionary biochemist Franklin Harold wrote, “we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical or cellular system, only a variety of wishful speculations.”3
6.) Living things look like they were designed, so how do evolutionists know that they were not designed? Richard Dawkins wrote, “biology is the study of complicated things that have the appearance of having been designed with a purpose.”4 Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of the double helix structure of DNA, wrote, “Biologists must constantly keep in mind that what they see was not designed, but rather evolved.”5 The problem for evolutionists is that living things show too much design. Who objects when an archaeologist says that pottery points to human design? Yet if someone attributes the design in living things to a designer, that is not acceptable. Why should science be restricted to naturalistic causes rather than logical causes?
7.) How did multi-cellular life originate? How did cells adapted to individual survival ‘learn’ to cooperate and specialize (including undergoing programmed cell death) to create complex plants and animals?
8.) How did sex originate? Asexual reproduction gives up to twice as much reproductive success (‘fitness’) for the same resources as sexual reproduction, so how could the latter ever gain enough advantage to be selected? And how could mere physics and chemistry invent the complementary apparatuses needed at the same time (non-intelligent processes cannot plan for future coordination of male and female organs).
9.) Why are the (expected) countless millions of transitional fossils missing? Darwin noted the problem and it still remains. The evolutionary family trees in textbooks are based on imagination, not fossil evidence. Famous Harvard paleontologist (and evolutionist), Stephen Jay Gould, wrote, “The extreme rarity of transitional forms in the fossil record persists as the trade secret of paleontology”.6 Other evolutionist fossil experts also acknowledge the problem.
10.) How do ‘living fossils’ remain unchanged over supposed hundreds of millions of years, if evolution has changed worms into humans in the same time frame? Professor Gould wrote, “the maintenance of stability within species must be considered as a major evolutionary problem.”7
11.) How did blind chemistry create mind/ intelligence, meaning, altruism and morality? If everything evolved, and we invented God, as per evolutionary teaching, what purpose or meaning is there to human life? Should students be learning nihilism (life is meaningless) in science classes?
12.) Why is evolutionary ‘just-so’ story-telling tolerated? Evolutionists often use flexible story-telling to ‘explain’ observations contrary to evolutionary theory. NAS(USA) member Dr Philip Skell wrote, “Darwinian explanations for such things are often too supple: Natural selection makes humans self-centered and aggressive—except when it makes them altruistic and peaceable. Or natural selection produces virile men who eagerly spread their seed—except when it prefers men who are faithful protectors and providers. When an explanation is so supple that it can explain any behavior, it is difficult to test it experimentally, much less use it as a catalyst for scientific discovery.”8
13.) Where are the scientific breakthroughs due to evolution? Dr Marc Kirschner, chair of the Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, stated: “In fact, over the last 100 years, almost all of biology has proceeded independent of evolution, except evolutionary biology itself. Molecular biology, biochemistry, physiology, have not taken evolution into account at all.”9 Dr Skell wrote, “It is our knowledge of how these organisms actually operate, not speculations about how they may have arisen millions of years ago, that is essential to doctors, veterinarians, farmers … .”10 Evolution actually hinders medical discovery.11 Then why do schools and universities teach evolution so dogmatically, stealing time from experimental biology that so benefits humankind?
14.) Science involves experimenting to figure out how things work; how they operate. Why is evolution, a theory about history, taught as if it is the same as this operational science? You cannot do experiments, or even observe what happened, in the past. Asked if evolution has been observed, Richard Dawkins said, “Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.”12
15.) Why is a fundamentally religious idea, a dogmatic belief system that fails to explain the evidence, taught in science classes? Karl Popper, famous philosopher of science, said “Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical [religious] research programme ….”13 Michael Ruse, evolutionist science philosopher admitted, “Evolution is a religion. This was true of evolution in the beginning, and it is true of evolution still today.”14 If “you can’t teach religion in science classes”, why is evolution taught?
|
|