Bundy Ranch, Militia OTW.

Still wondering why this guy hasn't been arrested.

What's your point? They still own the land, and Bundy is trespassing, illegally, regardless of the use of the land.

also:


They have authority of property they purchased, so yeah: they can do what they want with it.

Also by the power of the supremacy clause, any law they make overrides any state or county law, so you really have no leg to stand on.

With the superior educadion you claim to have, give these bolded sentences one more read.





Grazing fee's are regulation.

This is from Nevada's constitution about land.

"Section 1, titled “Inalienable Rights,” reads: All men are by Nature free and equal and have certain inalienable rights among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; Acquiring, Possessing and Protecting property and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness (Emphasis added).

In Section 22 of the Nevada Constitution, eminent domain is clarified. The state Constitution requires that the state prove public need, provide compensation and documentation before acquiring private property. In order to grant land to the federal government, the state must first control this land."


Bundy’s family has controlled the land for more than 140 years.

The Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which is an agency created by Congress, claimed that Bundy was “violating the law of the land.” Perhaps the agency has forgotten that the law of the land is the Constitution, and the only constitutional violation here is the very modern existence of the agency’s presence in Nevada.

How can they arrest him? The USA does not have a debtor prison.

You apparently need to learn to read, and not just from your copy/paste nonsense.

The article you read does not line up with the constitution, nor has any bearing to reality.

What you're talking about is the power of adding territories to the nation and then making them states, not property owned within the state.

As to Nevada's eminent domain clause: irrelevant and has no bearing on Federal law.

Trespassing, contempt of court.

I don't need to reread anything. Mr. Bundy has not controlled, or owned, anything. The Bundy family has been living on the land, never have they owned it. It's federal land. Mr. Bundy owes grazing fees. Courts have ruled on this issue, against Bundy.

Then why are they giving his cattle back and fleeing the area? Don't say "because people will get hurt" that has never stopped the government from carrying out the law before.

Since you enjoy copy and pasting so much Altima, why don't you paste the results of all the court cases that have come from this case over the last 20 years, then try to dispute them.

How bout you answer the question.

Probably because the BLM isn't used to such pathetic drama, it's not like they wanted to round up the cattle, they have openly said it was a last resort, a result of Mr. Bundy's refusal to obey the law. Like I said, just arrest him, forget about the cows, he has no case.

Why didn't they just arrest him? Its the Federal government right! they can do whatever they want!

edit: Do I really need to have a sarcasm tag on this ffs.

Wow, what have I been saying all along?

You've been saying absolutely nothing all along actually.

LOL, just the facts right? Anything else you want to type for us to shut down effortlessly? Or is your lesson over for the day?

He has his cattle back but he still owes the federal government a shitload of unpaid fees. The land in question was ceded by Mexico to the US government decades years before Nevada was ever a state, and nothing in the state constitution nor any legislation passed by Congress has ever granted the state control over all of this land. No court has ever ruled in favor of Bundy and none of that chain letter copypasta has anything to do with the situation at hand.

At least Saeval pulled out the almighty race card. You're going to have to step up your game.

You have done nothing but claim the BLM have the right to take his cattle and arrest him. You have not given any facts on why they ended up NOT doing either. According to you and Jet the fed's are all powerful and can do w/e they want. (Until a few protesters show up and scare them away)

Lol. It's becoming comical now with you Altima. The BLM was carrying out two court orders that told them to seize the cattle. That's a fact, that's not a claim. You are the one that has provided no facts as to why Bundy doesn't have to pay grazing fees. Keep trying tho, be sure to bring up he has been living there for 100 years.

http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/species/reptiles/desert_tortoise/pdfs/Order_US_v__Bundy_7_9_13.pdf

Now you're being blatantly ignorant and putting words in people's mouths.

The Federal government can do what they want as long as they pass the laws and they are upheld in court.

Pleebs remember now: "lolfederalcourts"

o yea im sure the federal government is totally scared of a few moderately armed ranchers who were smart enough to stand in the middle of an interstate highway. i know i would be. thats the only solution, can't think of any other reason other than they're scaaared ooooooooo *wiggly arms*

Im on an iPad so can't copy pasta, but kindly paste page 4, line 5-7 for Altima.

pasting

BOOM GOES THE DYNAMITE

Edit: NVM I'M LATE

You're slow Pleebs

roflmao YOUR accusing me of putting words in peoples mouth. (priceless)

I'm not accusing, I'm stating fact.

also, it's "you're" if you're attempting the conjunction of "you" and "are."

ewwwww, pointing out typo's? that's when the argument on the internet gets desperate. Don't do it, brah.