Accusations provided without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.
Hmm you mean like how when Donald Trump says “Ramirez has nothing because she was drunk and her testimony can’t be trusted” is the same as saying “Kavanuagh doesn’t have a strong defense because he was drunk and his testimony can’t be trusted”?
The type logic you’re applying is faulty because it’s applicable to both sides.
If they could get Mark Judge to testify and pull him out of his self imposed exile on the coast of Delaware that would be better would it not?