FL Bill Would Imprison TSs For Using Bathrooms

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
Version 3.1
New Items
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » FL Bill Would Imprison TSs for Using Bathrooms
FL Bill Would Imprison TSs for Using Bathrooms
First Page 2 3 ... 16 17 18
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-02-10 17:50:38
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bloodrose said: »
Related conditions

The following conditions may include dysphoria as a symptom:
Major depressive disorder (unipolar) and dysthymia
Bipolar disorder and cyclothymia
Premenstrual syndrome
Premenstrual dysphoric disorder
Stress
Adjustment disorder with depressed mood
Anxiety disorders such as Post traumatic stress disorder
Mixed anxiety-depressive disorder
Gender dysphoria, sometimes diagnosed as "gender identity disorder" (the latter term and its identification with gender dysphoria is controversial)
Personality disorders such as borderline personality disorder, dependent personality disorder and antisocial personality disorder
Substance withdrawal
Body dysmorphic disorder
Akathisia
Hypoglycemia
Schizophrenia
Sexual dysfunction
Body integrity identity disorder
Insomnia
Chronic pain

All fall under physical duress, and are recorded in the current DSM-5 as side effects of certain mental disorders.

I only have like 9 of those disorders.

With terrorism and Obama we are all depressed and anxious !
[+]
 Shiva.Onorgul
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Onorgul
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2015-02-10 17:57:50
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
Even though my physical appearance is human, I know that I'm really a god so everyone should stop treating me like a human and worship me instead.
We have laws protecting schizophrenics, so don't worry.

You guys kill me with this argument. It's "special treatment" to get to go into a bathroom stall and evacuate one's waste. One of the most basic human functions, asked to be performed in a way that puts one in a least-harm situation, and it's conflated to some hysterical ***. Transgender people don't want to be singled out, that's the whole point, but you guys keep arguing that they're apparently running around in the streets with their genitals flapping everywhere.

In context, it almost makes people who protested so loudly about gays seem sensible. I actually do walk down the street and kiss my boyfriend in public. I'm observably gay. And we've already decided that's acceptable, alongside inter-racial relationships and women wearing pants and all sorts of other irrational things that people waste their time fretting over.
[+]
 Leviathan.Comeatmebro
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: Rairin
Posts: 6052
By Leviathan.Comeatmebro 2015-02-10 18:06:23
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Verda said: »
~4 halfassed responses implying you're right and i'm wrong with no basis in evidence and a tone of condescension
Moving along..

Quote:
This is opinions... 592 more words about how your opinions are better than mine
The fact of the matter is, someone can feel they were born the wrong gender. That doesn't mean they were. Without scientific evidence, you're blindly following political correctness as much as I'm blindly following my interpretation of the situation.

Congratulations on your ability to make a 2 sentence thought appear to be pages long, though. It makes you remarkably obnoxious to interact with.
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2015-02-10 18:06:51
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
O & G?

Otherkin and Genderqueer

They keep adding "special" categories to further outline how "diverse" they are.
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-02-10 18:20:12
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I'm pretty diverse I used to have a black friend in jr. high school !
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-02-10 18:39:54
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Your ideas intrigue me. I'd like to subscribe to your newsletter !
Offline
Posts: 42747
By Jetackuu 2015-02-10 18:47:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bloodrose said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Prove that Gender Dysphoria isn't all just in the mind (whether a choice or a mental illness), and then we'll have that discussion.
Prove that it is. You have an assertion to make, you go ahead and prove your assertion.

I'm not going to wait, though. You're going to dodge as usual.
The burden of proof isn't on us, but nice try, and nice deflection.
Actually, the burden of proof is on you for making the assertion or claim that
1. they *shouldn't* be a Woman recognizable by law, despite living and identifying as one,
2. that it's purely mental (in the head, either by choice or mental illness) despite there being evidence of causing physical duress to the body due to being wired as a female.
No, for #1: that's literally HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE. How they live is irrelevant, and this is what people are talking about when they say *** want people to pander to their whims.

#2: No, the burden of proof is on you that it isn't, and the physical manifestation can be caused by the mind as well, not to mention like chaos said: citation needed.

Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Shiva.Onorgul said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Prove that Gender Dysphoria isn't all just in the mind (whether a choice or a mental illness), and then we'll have that discussion.
Prove that it is. You have an assertion to make, you go ahead and prove your assertion.

I'm not going to wait, though. You're going to dodge as usual.
The burden of proof isn't on us, but nice try, and nice deflection.
Wrong.

NEITHER SIDE can claim definitive evidence.

You're playing a game of "Well, since I reject your point-of-view, you're just going to have to agree with mine." Wrong. There is an absence of evidence on both sides and that means that neither assertion is well-supported. If you want to claim your assertion is correct, you have to prove it. Your assertion has no more potency to suggest that your beliefs trump others when all are made in the absence of evidence.

Which is why I've side-stepped your little pet theory and aimed at no-harm as a guiding principle instead.
Again with this ***about a "pet theory" what the *** are you talking about?

I made no assertion, but nice try. The burden of proof is on you and your ilk, if you want a group of people to get special treatment, you need to prove that they deserve special treatment.
Offline
Posts: 42747
By Jetackuu 2015-02-10 18:48:14
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Leviathan.Chaosx said: »
O & G?

Otherkin and Genderqueer

They keep adding "special" categories to further outline how "diverse" they are.

YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-02-10 19:13:41
Link | Quote | Reply
 
[+]
 Ragnarok.Nausi
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Nausi
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-02-10 20:02:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Its funny you say that, I think they keep expanding their classification so eventually they'll encompass everyone.

If Q is questioning, well *** who hasn't questioned their sexual orientation before?
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-02-10 20:07:04
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »

I made no assertion, but nice try. The burden of proof is on you and your ilk, if you want a group of people to get special treatment, you need to prove that they deserve special treatment.

I'm curious what special treatment you think people are advocating for. Without this law, they are subject to the same gender norms as anyone, male or female. The only difference is that supporters of the law are basically saying that anyone who doesn't fit neatly into either box is a criminal by some standard. If nothing else, they should get the same treatment as any androgynous person would, the benefit of the doubt. You see an androgynous person walk into your gender's restroom and you assume that they are supposed to be there, you don't require them to drop their pants to prove that they have the correct equipment. You just make your deuce in peace and move along.
[+]
 Leviathan.Chaosx
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-02-10 20:18:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
Its funny you say that, I think they keep expanding their classification so eventually they'll encompass everyone.

If Q is questioning, well *** who hasn't questioned their sexual orientation before?
You should check out this Huff Post article.

Here's an excerpt:

Quote:
So the idea of a gay fascist seems ridiculous. Yet when the British National Party - our own home-grown Holocaust-denying bigots - announced it was fielding an openly gay candidate in the European elections this June, dedicated followers of fascism didn't blink. The twisted truth is that gay men have been at the heart of every major fascist movement that ever was - including the gay-gassing, homo-cidal Third Reich. With the exception of Jean-Marie Le Pen, all the most high-profile fascists in Europe in the past thirty years have been gay. It's time to admit something. Fascism isn't something that happens out there, a nasty habit acquired by the straight boys. It is - in part, at least - a gay thing, and it's time for non-fascist gay people to wake up and face the marching music.
The Strange, Strange Story of the Gay Fascists
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-02-10 20:32:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Gay and fascism I died and went to heaven !
[+]
Offline
Posts: 42747
By Jetackuu 2015-02-10 20:42:19
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »

I made no assertion, but nice try. The burden of proof is on you and your ilk, if you want a group of people to get special treatment, you need to prove that they deserve special treatment.

I'm curious what special treatment you think people are advocating for. Without this law, they are subject to the same gender norms as anyone, male or female. The only difference is that supporters of the law are basically saying that anyone who doesn't fit neatly into either box is a criminal by some standard. If nothing else, they should get the same treatment as any androgynous person would, the benefit of the doubt. You see an androgynous person walk into your gender's restroom and you assume that they are supposed to be there, you don't require them to drop their pants to prove that they have the correct equipment. You just make your deuce in peace and move along.

I understand that you don't get it, and your statement here is evident that you probably will never get it.

You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Server: Garuda
Game: FFXI
user: Chanti
Posts: 11783
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-02-10 21:46:53
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
....
You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
I think this bill is legislating discrimination.
Offline
Posts: 42747
By Jetackuu 2015-02-10 21:58:27
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Jetackuu said: »
....
You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
I think this bill is legislating discrimination.
Of course, by it's nature any bill segregating bathrooms is discriminating, but the point was that it isn't increasing that discrimination.
[+]
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-02-10 23:06:31
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Jetackuu said: »
....
You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
I think this bill is legislating discrimination.
Of course, by it's nature any bill segregating bathrooms is discriminating, but the point was that it isn't increasing that discrimination.

A bill that does nothing to address any real problem and serves only to criminalize one group simply for existing... yeah, I sure don't get it.
Offline
Posts: 42747
By Jetackuu 2015-02-10 23:12:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Jetackuu said: »
....
You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
I think this bill is legislating discrimination.
Of course, by it's nature any bill segregating bathrooms is discriminating, but the point was that it isn't increasing that discrimination.

A bill that does nothing to address any real problem and serves only to criminalize one group simply for existing... yeah, I sure don't get it.
Yet neither of those are accurate, that's why you don't get it.
[+]
 Bismarck.Snprphnx
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Snprphnx
Posts: 2715
By Bismarck.Snprphnx 2015-02-10 23:24:26
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Let's just convert all bathrooms nationwide into co-Ed restrooms and be done with it.
[+]
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-02-10 23:34:17
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Jetackuu said: »
....
You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
I think this bill is legislating discrimination.
Of course, by it's nature any bill segregating bathrooms is discriminating, but the point was that it isn't increasing that discrimination.

A bill that does nothing to address any real problem and serves only to criminalize one group simply for existing... yeah, I sure don't get it.
Yet neither of those are accurate, that's why you don't get it.

By all means, educate me.
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2015-02-11 04:39:42
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »

I made no assertion, but nice try. The burden of proof is on you and your ilk, if you want a group of people to get special treatment, you need to prove that they deserve special treatment.

I'm curious what special treatment you think people are advocating for. Without this law, they are subject to the same gender norms as anyone, male or female. The only difference is that supporters of the law are basically saying that anyone who doesn't fit neatly into either box is a criminal by some standard. If nothing else, they should get the same treatment as any androgynous person would, the benefit of the doubt. You see an androgynous person walk into your gender's restroom and you assume that they are supposed to be there, you don't require them to drop their pants to prove that they have the correct equipment. You just make your deuce in peace and move along.


This is a preventive measure. The LGBTGQO lobby did the worst thing they could do when they took that bakery to trial over their refusal to bake a homosexual wedding cake on religious grounds. They showed to everyone that they were willing to use the law to offend and attack ordinary citizens and force them to do things against their religion. To those of you already on the left, you think there is nothing wrong because you are operating under the false assumption that "you are right". To those of us who are neutral you just announced, loud and clear, that not only did you simply not care about anyone else's feelings or beliefs, but that you were going to actively pursue legal action against anyone who disagreed with you.

The smartest thing those people could of done was walk away and give someone else their business while spreading the knowledge of that bakery's prejudice and bigotry. Instead they took ensured that everyone else now operates under the assumption that its "when" and not "if" some LGBTGQO person decided to push their agenda and start suing anyone who disagrees. Laws like this wouldn't would be passed unless there was a sizable population who believed that at some point in the future someone was going go to into their city / county / state and start demanding everyone accommodate them or else they will get big daddy government to bust down your door and hold a gun to your head and force you to.

Currently the LGBTGQO lobby is no different then the ultra religious lobby. And if you can't see this then your too invested in a political ideology to be an objective neutral party.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 970
By Voren 2015-02-11 07:09:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
To play devil's advocate for a bit, Saevel, take out LGBTGQO and replace it with Black. It's the 1960's all over again.

You'd think that everyone would have learned their lesson by now and instead of hiding their bigotry behind religion, politics, personal opinion they'd instead come to terms with the fact that not everyone else is going to feel how they do about a particular group of people.

The LGBT community (and yes I redacted it to four letters sue me) did exactly what has been done in the past. Unfortunately law makers have gone full swing batshit crazy and decided to retaliate with something that borderlines obscene.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 35422
By fonewear 2015-02-11 08:31:55
Link | Quote | Reply
 
You who is responsible for all of this...the Jews !

Jews hate public restrooms always have always will.
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2015-02-11 09:32:41
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Voren said: »
To play devil's advocate for a bit, Saevel, take out LGBTGQO and replace it with Black. It's the 1960's all over again.

You'd think that everyone would have learned their lesson by now and instead of hiding their bigotry behind religion, politics, personal opinion they'd instead come to terms with the fact that not everyone else is going to feel how they do about a particular group of people.

The LGBT community (and yes I redacted it to four letters sue me) did exactly what has been done in the past. Unfortunately law makers have gone full swing batshit crazy and decided to retaliate with something that borderlines obscene.

Except it's comparing Apples to Oranges. Blacks were historically oppressed and underrepresented, LGBTGQO on the other hand have not. Homosexuality has been present in the ruling ultra elite for several thousand years of recorded human history. What they did is wrong, they forced their own personal agenda onto someone else and forced them, at gunpoint, to violate their religious beliefs. Getting the government to do anything for you is by definition using lethal force because all government actions are enforced by the governments near monopoly on justified homicide.

You obviously don't respect people's religious beliefs (regardless of how bigoted it might be) and so can't possibly comprehend the level of animosity that was generated. You might as well of held an event where tens of thousands of bibles were publicly burned with little crux-fixes were being handed out as pop-sickles. Even those of us who aren't particularly religious yet aren't so far up the progressive lefts a$$ that we can't see right from wrong, can see how aggressive the LGBTGQO on left has been these last few years. It's done nothing but polarize people against you and once that starts to happen you get dumb sh!t like this. You are not a discriminated oppressed people, the center of LGBTGQO activity isn't some economically challenged ghetto ridden city but one of the most expensive most affluent cities in the world.

Every time I hear about "oppression" in a first world nation this comes to mind.







It's become an Oppression Olympics which the gold medalist being whomever can claim the most oppression points. You f*ckers don't know oppression. Oppression isn't some religious bigot making rude comments about you or refusing you service, oppression is death chambers, forced labor camps, public executions and witch hunts. There are places in the world, one not so far away from me, where real oppression happens every day with the body count still rising and you people have the gall to claim "I'm being oppressed!", as though your somehow special and we should give a damn about your feelings.

Compare someone not baking a f*cking wedding cake to this, then come talk to me about oppression.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/south-korean-report-details-alleged-abuses-at-north-koreas-prison-camps/2012/05/09/gIQA794LDU_story.html
[+]
Offline
Posts: 42747
By Jetackuu 2015-02-11 09:47:02
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Yeah, no. Sorry but forcing a business to not discriminate against it's clientele is not violating their religious beliefs.
[+]
 Garuda.Chanti
Offline
Server: Garuda
Game: FFXI
user: Chanti
Posts: 11783
By Garuda.Chanti 2015-02-11 10:56:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Jetackuu said: »
....
You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
I think this bill is legislating discrimination.
Of course, by it's nature any bill segregating bathrooms is discriminating, but the point was that it isn't increasing that discrimination.
Of course not. It neither increases nor decreases existing discrimination, it mandates discrimination and has a mechanism to punish those who do not discriminate.

fonewear said: »
You who is responsible for all of this...the Jews !

Jews hate public restrooms always have always will.
True fact: In Chicago during the jazz era, many establishments had three bathrooms.

The labels were White, Colored, Jewish.
Offline
Posts: 42747
By Jetackuu 2015-02-11 11:18:13
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Garuda.Chanti said: »
Jetackuu said: »
....
You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.
I think this bill is legislating discrimination.
Of course, by it's nature any bill segregating bathrooms is discriminating, but the point was that it isn't increasing that discrimination.
Of course not. It neither increases nor decreases existing discrimination, it mandates discrimination and has a mechanism to punish those who do not discriminate.
That's what I've been saying the whole time...

I don't agree with the need to separate bathrooms in the first place.
 Cerberus.Wonton
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: WonTon
Posts: 27
By Cerberus.Wonton 2015-02-11 12:01:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »

I made no assertion, but nice try. The burden of proof is on you and your ilk, if you want a group of people to get special treatment, you need to prove that they deserve special treatment.

I'm curious what special treatment you think people are advocating for. Without this law, they are subject to the same gender norms as anyone, male or female. The only difference is that supporters of the law are basically saying that anyone who doesn't fit neatly into either box is a criminal by some standard. If nothing else, they should get the same treatment as any androgynous person would, the benefit of the doubt. You see an androgynous person walk into your gender's restroom and you assume that they are supposed to be there, you don't require them to drop their pants to prove that they have the correct equipment. You just make your deuce in peace and move along.

I understand that you don't get it, and your statement here is evident that you probably will never get it.

You still think that this bill is adding discrimination, when it isn't.

Exactly; it's the same way California's Prop 8 wasn't discriminatory. It was reinforcing a gay man's right to marry a woman.
[+]
 Ragnarok.Nausi
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Nausi
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-02-11 12:41:37
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Voren said: »
To play devil's advocate for a bit, Saevel, take out LGBTGQO and replace it with Black. It's the 1960's all over again.

You'd think that everyone would have learned their lesson by now and instead of hiding their bigotry behind religion, politics, personal opinion they'd instead come to terms with the fact that not everyone else is going to feel how they do about a particular group of people.

The LGBT community (and yes I redacted it to four letters sue me) did exactly what has been done in the past. Unfortunately law makers have gone full swing batshit crazy and decided to retaliate with something that borderlines obscene.

You cannot dissolve the distinctions between X and Y discrimination by equating them. Discriminating on race is different than by gender identity.
First Page 2 3 ... 16 17 18