The Supremes Tackle Birth Control

Oh it gets interesting. Take "*** shamming" for example. Something that the feminists and castrated white knights usually blame on men. They parade around and hold rallies about how men are judging women and blah blah. What's really interesting is that men typically hold a neutral stance on female promiscuity. Promiscuous females are actually in a males best interest as it means minimum commitment and provision for access to sex. The ones who really do the *** shamming are other women. Promiscuous women drive the price of sex down in the sexual marketplace. They are the wall-mart of the sexual economy. It's the women who judge other women based on how easy they give up sex. It's the women who reject promiscuous women from their social groups. And it's women who conduct covert rumor operations to discredit and lower a rival's social standing.

The one time that the sexual promiscuity of a women matters to men is in the artificial monogamy we've created to build society. It's a purely rational decision, a women who frequently changes lovers can't be relied upon to control her hypergamy and stay monogamous. She's perfectly fine as a friend, lover or business partner, but not as a wife. Further if she was to continue her promiscuous ways she would get pregnant with a child from a different man, it would then be the husbands responsibility to provide resources for DNA that wasn't his.

They'd probably need a new hobby.

Actually, it's 50 full time equivalents.

You can have 75 employees, but if you have less than 49 total full time equivalents, then you are not considered a medium sized business for Obamacare.

Same rules apply to the Small Business Health Care Tax Credit, but instead of 40 hours, it's 32 hours

Reread it very carefully.

thanks for the imagery... and I have pushed five kidney stones out of my wee hole, thanks for reminding me..... /smells the but coming (phrasing)

BUT this case isn't about regular birth control pills....
thank you for playing we have a lovely consolation prize for you... we hid it in your pocket.

Do you know why they call it fantasy and not reality? Ask the same women if they want to actually be raped or the ones that have been if they thought it was a great romp. The reality of the situation is far different from a fantasy...

You bring up BDSM but it isn't catered to male dominance... There are men out there looking for a heel in their back and a whip put to them so I guess they want to experience being dominated too?

To me you just seem to be stuck in a time that's no longer here where women "knew their place" and did what they were told... none of this man stuff!

You know what this thread needs?

A Hitler reference.

.....

I can't believe you actually think something is free. Nothing is ever free. Everything has a cost, the only question is who's paying it. You just stated that you expect me to pay for your medication, and didn't even have the courteously to ask. Instead you want a third party to forcibly take the money from me, at gun point.

And btw folks, take note this is classic emotional manipulation at work. Open with sort of strife or tale of suffering, preferably about women and children. Then go into a way that someone can "make it better", and finally cinch it with a "just join me" phrase.

#1: I had this horribly medical condition that caused me lots of pain. This is pain that others suffer.
#2: Taking this item removed my pain and it can remove others too
#3: Thus wonder thing should be made freely available to all to remove their pain

You can convince people to do truly atrocious things by following that pattern.

I'm not picking on you, just used that as a demonstration of simple emotional manipulation that happens a lot.

T3T my skirt has no pockets *cry*
And you can't blaim a girl for saying her 2 cents :3 (I never understand america and their "founding fathers/religious" stuff (but i guess it's just me being a simple farm girl from belgium XD)
now if you excuse me :D my kitchen is calling~~ (BF home in 20min.)
:( can i still have my price though... *opens up a baggie*

I'm surprised they haven't tried to shame me with that yet. Wouldn't work, but I'd at least expect them to give it an old school effort. Proper form and all.

Hitler led the first public anti-smoking campaign in modern history.

Don't be a Hitler, smoke some cigs.

Two words. Penis pumps.

The 1936 Summer Olympics were held in Berlin, and were opened by Adolf Hitler in the worlds first television broadcast (I know this for a fact, I saw it in "Contact"). Hitler then went on to start WW2.

Russia just hosted the 2014 Winter Olympics, and then Putin invaded Crimea, and looks to be preparing for all out war with the west.

Conclusion - they need to ban the freaking Olympics.

Are we overdue for a Lifetime movie reference ?

well that's simple. america was founded by two very different and distinct groups, religious wackos and prisoners.

and as soon as we got here, we started fighting... yadda yadda yadda.
which brings us to now.

I could introduce you to a couple of professional dominatrices. I suspect you might even learn something....

I dare you to watch the whole thing. Double dog dare.

Actually rape fantasies are a small part of the BDSM scene. Having sewn kinkwear for decades I just might know a bit about the culture.

None of my fantasies involve birth control !

One of your best comments to date King.

Jet, if you're going to be pro-choice, at least grow the balls to claim responsibility for what you want.

Just no. All out war? What planet are you on. Putin has no allies and has completely *** himself over to score some nationalist points back home. I guess I'm just missing the allies lining up to back Putin in "all out war". Putin is no Hitler and 2014 is no 1936.

I'm cancelling the apocalypse.

INTERESTING sideline on the topic.

Remember the topic anyone?

How A Pot-Worshipping Church Could Play Into The Hobby Lobby Case

the neighborhood children never recovered from their visit to grandma chanti's house and witnessed her sitting in her rocking chair stitching up a gimp suit surrounded by adult paraphernalia...

todd still chews idly on a ball of twine... his white hair glows in the moon light.

And we have another who doesn't understand the premise of the court case. Birth control isn't on trial here, emergency (abortive) contraception is, these are methods that "unfire" the gun, not disable the trigger.

Hobby Lobby will willfully buy a policy that cover 16 of the 20 (21?) contraceptive methods listed in the legislation. Just not the ones that are emergency in nature.

If that's your opinion, you're not arguing with anyone...

No. It's a case about the definition of corporate personhood.

This is where I always hit a stumbling block with this whole thing.

I get the idea of being opposed to birth control in any and all forms. I get the idea of being opposed to abortion. What I don't get is this in-between position that Hobby Lobby and several others have taken up. For one, it is contrary to Christian doctrine, especially Roman Catholic canon. If it is patently against doctrine to support some forms of birth control, why the specificity? It seems like a half-assed attempt to oppose abortion, but science doesn't back it up. Emergency contraception actually does prevent conception. Sperm and ovum don't collide immediately at ejaculation.

I don't find it very compelling that this is an argument against abortion, above and beyond the basic misunderstanding of what is going on. I can't even be convinced that it is some kind of cost-saving measure as it just doesn't cost that much, especially when spread across thousands of companies and millions of insured people. The spineless anti-women arguments presented in defense of this nonsense seem to disregard that the individual cost to a given man is infinitesimal (to say nothing of being considerably cheaper than the costs associated with pregnancy which are unequivocally covered by insurance).

What the *** point is this stupid argument trying to make? I'm sure that there are some deluded idiots, like the talking heads at Hobby Lobby, who imagine they really are fighting abortion, but it's certain that if they really believe that, it's because they're being manipulated by someone else with a different axe to grind. The most likely culprit is trying to get around government regulation and, therefore, being able to do whatever one wants.

I think everyone did, you sound pretty secure with your insecurities.
You're saying all women are ***, they can't stay faithful, they lack will power and character. Reading between the lines you're admitting you're insecure, lack confidence, have a small *** and woman constantly cheat on you.

Reread it very carefully.

Do you have any inkling as to why exactly that is (that is, why corporations are legally distinct from its owners) or are you just kneejerking to a perceived attack on religion?

Another reason for birth control: