FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:6/21/2013 4:41:44 AM
Score:5465
Average Framerate:45.008
Performance:Very High
-Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions.
Screen Size: 1280x960
Screen Mode: Full Screen
Graphics Presets: Maximum
General
-Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled
-Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled
-Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled
-Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled
-Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled
-Grass Quality : High
Shadows
-Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled
-Display : All
-Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels
-Shadow Cascading : High
-Shadow Softening : High
Texture Detail
-Texture Filtering : High
-Anisotropic Filtering : High
Effects
-Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled
-Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled
-Effects While in Motion : Display All
-Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High
-Glare : Normal
Cinematic Cutscenes
-Enable depth of field. : Enabled
System:
Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130318-1533)
AMD FX(tm)-4100 Quad-Core Processor
8175.238MB
AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series(VRAM 4095 MB) 8.17.0010.1172
Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn will run on your system.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com
(C) 2010-2013 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved.
Tweet
http://sqex.to/ffxiv_bench_na #FFXIV Score:5465 1280x960 Maximum AMD FX(tm)-4100 Quad-Core Processor AMD Radeon HD 7800 Series
FFXIV Benchmark Is Now Avaliable!!!!
|
FFXIV Benchmark is now avaliable!!!!
Fenrir.Mariane said: » Bahamut.Milamber said: » FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration) Tested on:6/20/2013 11:47:59 PM Score:6390 Downgrade the driver to 260.99 (October 2010) and you will probably hit around 8000 on that benchmark ... Edit: I obviously mean this only for people using older cards like 8xxx series or G200 based like my GTX280 ... People with Fermi (400x series, some 500 series GFxxx core), Kepler(600/700 series GKxxx core) or Tesla (to be released) cards should disregard this as old drivers won't work with their cards ... Ran it against 311.06; downloading 260.99 and 320.18. I wouldn't expect performance to deteriorate (i.e. would have expected gains in 260.99 to be carried forward), but hell, I've seen enough crazy things in software that I'll test it rather than make assumptions. Since both of our desktops are pretty much identical, I might as well figure out the best combination on one before working on the other. Version;Score;FPS
311.06;6390;54.914 260.99;6893;58.976 311.06;4229;35.025 260.99;4971;40.938 311.06;2950;23.708 260.99;3135;25.259 Interesting, 260.99 gives roughly 10-20% better performance than the current drivers. That's nothing to shake a stick at. Does 260.99 usually run better on other games too? I am running a GTX260 (not related to driver number) with the latest firmware. I have noticed declines in performance in the past, after updating the drivers..
Valefor.Tiniky said: » Does 260.99 usually run better on other games too? I am running a GTX260 (not related to driver number) with the latest firmware. I have noticed declines in performance in the past, after updating the drivers.. Honestly, I can't say that one driver would be faster than the other without doing testing. here is my current score, anything i can do to make the Marks/FPS higher w/o making the game look like crap?
FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration) Tested on:6/20/2013 9:44:03 PM Score:3362 Average Framerate:27.163 Performance:Fairly High -Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance. Screen Size: 1280x720 Screen Mode: Windowed Graphics Presets: Maximum General -Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled -Grass Quality : High Shadows -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Display : All -Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels -Shadow Cascading : High -Shadow Softening : High Texture Detail -Texture Filtering : High -Anisotropic Filtering : High Effects -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled -Effects While in Motion : Display All -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High -Glare : Normal Cinematic Cutscenes -Enable depth of field. : Enabled System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130318-1533) Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU 760 @ 2.80GHz 8151.117MB NVIDIA GeForce GT 640 (VRAM 4042 MB) 9.18.0013.2018 Benchmark results do not provide any guarantee FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn will run on your system. FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Website http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com (C) 2010-2013 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD. All Rights Reserved. i have the latest amd CCC(driver) 13.4 (dld from amd 4 days ago) and the beta wont open (crashes on open) - any ideas? (ffxi works fine)
Asura.Izilder said: » i have the latest amd CCC(driver) 13.4 (dld from amd 4 days ago) and the beta wont open (crashes on open) - any ideas? (ffxi works fine) Bahamut.Milamber said: » Can you run the benchmark? If nothing else, try installing directx9c via microsoft's web installer. I know that running the downloadable installer on a just-installed version of win7 is not sufficient, despite the confirmation dialogs. For me that was enough to get both 1.0 and ARR benchmarks to work on a freshly installed Windows7 PC. I am not sure if it results on a fully working DirectX 9 install on Windows 7 but it certainly was enough to allow the benchmarks to run. Funny enough the FFXI benchmarks won't run on W7 or Vista no matter what you try. first time on default medium settings
second time on default maximum now if this time around they could just make the servers not lag... edit: retested on full screen 1080res, dropped a bit but staying over 60 fps gets no complaints from me How i feel everytime I look at my benchmark score.
[+]
upgrading my video card to stabilize intensive graphics with lots of applications running, anyone have the gtx 760?
going from NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 (VRAM 4050 MB) to http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130937 EVGA 04G-P4-2766-KR GeForce GTX 760 4GB should be here Wednesday edit: lol'd  it is a preoverclocked Gigabyte gtx 780 oc . so the final clock Speed was 1231mhz (watercooled). totaly forgot to save the the score so i made a scnd run with a bit less gpu clock . FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration) Tested on:7/23/2013 11:24:26 PM Score:9999 Average Framerate:87.760 Performance:Extremely High -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings. Screen Size: 1920x1080 Screen Mode: Full Screen Graphics Presets: Maximum General -Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled -Grass Quality : High Shadows -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Display : All -Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels -Shadow Cascading : High -Shadow Softening : High Texture Detail -Texture Filtering : High -Anisotropic Filtering : High Effects -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled -Effects While in Motion : Display All -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High -Glare : Normal Cinematic Cutscenes -Enable depth of field. : Enabled System: Windows 8 64-Bit-Version (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130531-1504) Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4770K CPU @ 3.50GHz 8130.566MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780(VRAM 4095 MB) 9.18.0013.2049 @ rinnsi: where is the log ? stop trolling
@ zeromega Quote: Score:10363 Average Framerate:135.274 Fenrir.Rinnsi said: »  did i do good daddy? it's actually from alttabbing, which boosts the numbers a ton. with programs running and no overclocking, only got a 6k+
new character creation Benchmark just came out an this was the first run so far ,
seem ist Software is alot better since my gpu goes up tp about 85% insteat of 50% on the old one  about to get my 780 in a few days, so will have to see what numbers i can put out now, since my current GPU is a 560. hopefully get numbers like that, what is your card?
Oh i see you have the 780 as well, then i should be getting those numbers, whee Did they nerf the requirements to run this game again or something? On the first benchmark i ran a few weeks back I scored a 7597 (non overclocked) on max settings. Downloaded this character creation one and it shot up to 15,140 on max setting (without even overclocking).
ist a Gigabyte gtx 780 oc (under water)
+ around 290gpu clock (compared to a non oc model without extra overclocking) + around 400 Memory clock ( can go to about +450/470 Memory) I7 4770k @ 4,7ghz it seemed they optimized the GPU usage and lowerd the cpu usage . going from stock 3.5ghz to 4.7ghz only gave me around 200 Points . going from 1600 8gb ram to 2100 8gb ram also only gave me another 150 Points also i have seen another screenshot with a gtx680 who had 15300 Points with 2560x1600. it seem there are some glitches in it . he might had all the shiney stuff deactivated in the Nvidea settings  I'm guessing there are some glitches with this benchmark yes cause jumping from 7597 from old benchmark to 15,140 with this latest benchmark using the same unchanged PC seems questionable to me.
anyone else trying to run it in fullscreen but it shows up in window mode only?
I really wish they would up the graphics settings significantly. Personally I feel I should not be able to score 'extremely high' on max settings with a 2 year old PC that wasn't even cutting edge back then. Given that it's an MMO and I plan to be with it for a while (this time -- hopefully) I feel like they should aim for max settings to be very, very high, such that very few can turn everything all the way up. Then, in a few years or so as the player base gradually updates as they will, more and more players can continue to turn the settings up higher and higher. Setting it so that mediocre PCs can run at max settings from the start just means that we'll all feel that the graphics are dated and dull in 2 years or less.
Valefor.Monkeynutz said: » I really wish they would up the graphics settings significantly. Personally I feel I should not be able to score 'extremely high' on max settings with a 2 year old PC that wasn't even cutting edge back then. Given that it's an MMO and I plan to be with it for a while (this time -- hopefully) I feel like they should aim for max settings to be very, very high, such that very few can turn everything all the way up. Then, in a few years or so as the player base gradually updates as they will, more and more players can continue to turn the settings up higher and higher. Setting it so that mediocre PCs can run at max settings from the start just means that we'll all feel that the graphics are dated and dull in 2 years or less. If all this is referring to your score using the latest benchmark then there is a chance that the benchmark is glitched anyway and your score isn't really anywhere near what it displays at the end (I know for me my score almost doubled what it used to be on the old benchmark and considering that the cut scenes are both the same in each benchmark and the computer is exactly the same for both times i ran it it seems suspicious and questionable). Anyway I was under the impression that when they remade the game what they reworked was really the battle mechanics, UI, content etc and not necessarily the graphics (which was never the problem to begin with with the game). game looks amazing, i don't see your point. just because it's not a GPU raper means nothing. properly optimized, amazing games can run on low end cards. poor optimiztion, and the shittiest looking game can make your card run like crap
I agree tho, My score was 9300 old benchmark 1080P. Now it jumped up to 15,600 seems off especially since I have a HD 7850 OC to 1100MHZ and GTX 780's getting similar scores. Yep seems off. I mean sure my CPU is good Intel i5 4670K but I doubt it'll make that much of a difference lol.
Siren.Knivesz said: » Valefor.Monkeynutz said: » I really wish they would up the graphics settings significantly. Personally I feel I should not be able to score 'extremely high' on max settings with a 2 year old PC that wasn't even cutting edge back then. Given that it's an MMO and I plan to be with it for a while (this time -- hopefully) I feel like they should aim for max settings to be very, very high, such that very few can turn everything all the way up. Then, in a few years or so as the player base gradually updates as they will, more and more players can continue to turn the settings up higher and higher. Setting it so that mediocre PCs can run at max settings from the start just means that we'll all feel that the graphics are dated and dull in 2 years or less. If all this is referring to your score using the latest benchmark then there is a chance that the benchmark is glitched anyway and your score isn't really anywhere near what it displays at the end (I know for me my score almost doubled what it used to be on the old benchmark and considering that the cut scenes are both the same in each benchmark and the computer is exactly the same for both times i ran it it seems suspicious and questionable). Anyway I was under the impression that when they remade the game what they reworked was really the battle mechanics, UI, content etc and not necessarily the graphics (which was never the problem to begin with with the game). So i tried the benchmark and got this...
Mind you I didn't change any of the setting just change from high to standard laptop I find it odd and unsure why it shows my intergrated graphic card there but if I go to setting it shows my NVIDIA... Idk alot about quality in terms of resolution but when I switched it to Full screen (resolution still the same) I got slightly better score in high laptop (got 5426) Of course I suppose not that much of a difference... Never mind think I got my answer...when I changed it to 1600 X 900 (also my computer's resolution) I got 3950 :P   Standard settings got 9782
Everything max got 6200 I'm happy with that but been doing beta with no trouble so didn't expect to be low as original game. System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit Service Pack 1 AMD Athlon(tm) II X4 640 Processor 8189.242MB AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series(VRAM 4095 MB) 8.17.0010.1191 No overclocking on system and still gotta get more memory this MB can hold |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.