On this machine:
Athlon 4400x2
AMD Raedon HD 6670
2GB ram
I forget the MB...
XP
@1280X 720 medium, 4361 high.
/blink
I did optimize.
On this laptop:
AMD Phenom X4 N970
AMD Raedon 6650M
4 GB DDR3
Win 7
1280 x 720 medium
3499 fairly high
Didn't optimize
FFXIV Benchmark Is Now Avaliable!!!!
|
FFXIV Benchmark is now avaliable!!!!
phenom2 x4 940 oc'd to 3.5ghz
4gig 667 galaxy gts450 ref clock 888mhz oc'd to 955mhz win7 64bit 1280x768 medium preset didnt change anything 8062 same pc same settings 1920x1080 5710 Score:5018
Average Framerate:40.279 Performance:Very High -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions. Screen Size: 1680x1050 Graphics Presets: Custom General -Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Enabled -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Enabled -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Disabled -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled -Grass Quality : High Shadows -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Display : All -Shadow Resolution : Low: 512 pixels -Shadow Cascading : Off -Shadow Softening : High Texture Detail -Texture Filtering : High -Anisotropic Filtering : High Effects -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled -Effects While in Motion : Display All -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High -Glare : Off Cinematic Cutscenes -Enable depth of field. : Enabled System: Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431) Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9650 @ 3.00GHz 3070.457MB ATI Radeon HD 5900 Series(VRAM 3307 MB) 8.17.0010.1172 Did anyone else notice Genbu walking across the background before the final cinematic? lol So I pretty much said "*** it" and dropped 200 dollars today. I bought a 7770 AMD Radeon graphics card and a TR2 430W Thermaltake power pack for my PC. Ran the benchmark... My highest score on my last graphics card was 2226. This one got...
Quote: FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration) Tested on:2/23/2013 7:17:19 PM Score:4449 Average Framerate:35.389 Performance:High -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform well, even at higher resolutions. Screen Size: 1920x1080 Graphics Presets: Custom General -Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Enabled -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Enabled -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Enabled -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Disabled -Grass Quality : Low Shadows -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Enabled -Display : Personal and Environmental -Shadow Resolution : Low: 512 pixels -Shadow Cascading : Normal -Shadow Softening : Low Texture Detail -Texture Filtering : High -Anisotropic Filtering : Low Effects -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Disabled -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled -Effects While in Motion : Display All -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : Off -Glare : Low Cinematic Cutscenes -Enable depth of field. : Disabled System: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431) AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1045T Processor 8191.285MB AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series(VRAM 746 MB) 8.17.0010.1124 
[+]
430w power pack, is that like a secondary power supply? or is that little baby power supply pushing your whole rig?? not trying to sound dickish but i'm shocked your pc will even turn on if thats all you got.
Odin.Moondaddy said: » 430w power pack, is that like a secondary power supply? or is that little baby power supply pushing your whole rig?? not trying to sound dickish but i'm shocked your pc will even turn on if thats all you got. All his parts are use low power but still o.o i would get a 500-600w to be on the save side. AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1045T Requires 95W
AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series Requires 500w So really you'd want 650w + at least That said, if you have no problems with your rig on the 430w then it's fine ^^. No idea if lack of power = lack of performance tho (it may tho) Ragnarok.Rezeak said: » AMD Phenom(tm) II X6 1045T Requires 95W AMD Radeon HD 7700 Series Requires 500w So really you'd want 650w + at least That said, if you have no problems with your rig on the 430w then it's fine ^^. No idea if lack of power = lack of performance tho (it may tho) If the GPU is starving on power it can get affected performance. When playing games he could easy have issue with artifact and such. That why it's always good to be on the safe side a get a good psu. Looking at that PSU on newegg if it's the same one seem cheap it would die in no time happen to me on two pc when i went with cheap PSU so i ended up getting two med rage PSU for two of my pc. I mean he could play years without issue but still there good PSU for 20$ more and have better W. So ya i agree 650w would be best for any med range rig. I thought I was going to achieve 7000+ with a GTX 660Ti. Nope! I knew I should have spent another bill on a 670 or gotten a Radeon. Sigh.
FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration) Tested on:2/24/2013 5:54:04 AM Score:6504 Average Framerate:54.602 Performance:Very High -Easily capable of running the game. Should perform exceptionally well, even at higher resolutions. Screen Size: 1920x1080 Graphics Presets: Maximum General -Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled -Grass Quality : High Shadows -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Display : All -Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels -Shadow Cascading : High -Shadow Softening : High Texture Detail -Texture Filtering : High -Anisotropic Filtering : High Effects -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled -Effects While in Motion : Display All -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High -Glare : Normal Cinematic Cutscenes -Enable depth of field. : Enabled System: Windows 8 Pro 64-bit (6.2, Build 9200) (9200.win8_gdr.130108-1504) Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz 16271.246MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti(VRAM 4095 MB) 9.18.0013.1090 The 430W Thermaltake power supply was made to support the 7000 series of Radeon from what I friends told me. I'm not running a super modded self-built computer. I'm just using a store-bought tower. So, except for the graphics card and the new power supply, everything else is off the shelf.
just keep an eye on your temps, besides the stated performance problems you might/will prob see under voltaging can cause overheating. also its not the wattage you need to worry about as much as amperage. i have a pcpower and cooling 470w psu that pushes 36amps @12v, my brother has a 680w ultra psu that only pushes 30amps off the 12v rail. at the time we had the same pc and he has always had probs with his system, mine ran smooth as butter.
Fenrir.Stiklelf said: » Toshiba looks better in my eyes, slightly faster cpu more mem on the gpu and also i believe stronger model the 670 vs the 660 only thing i dont like is windows 8 on it and also i learned that for gaming not good to go with laptops because limited upgrades and hardware performance, also cooling sucks on most. but for the price get more ports like usb and such then the ASUS. Again this was from first glance, just google comparison on the parts also the ASUS doesnt have much detail. edit: noticed the toshiba has a dvd drive and ASUS a bluray drive so also not sure if it matters to you being able to watch a bluray on your laptop if you travel. but spec wise the Toshiba looks more promising. I'm just looking at the specs. Was wondering how it would run XIV
Did they learn and downgrade requirements from 1.0? Meaning if you could run the original you can run this?
Phoenix.Xantavia said: » Did they learn and downgrade requirements from 1.0? Meaning if you could run the original you can run this? my benchmark for ARR was over 3 times higher than it was for 1.0 with the same system FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/25/2013 2:03:12 PM Score:3120 Average Framerate:24.888 Performance:Fairly High -Capable of running the game on default settings. Consider switching to a higher resolution depending on performance. Screen Size: 1920x1080 Graphics Presets: Maximum General -Improve overall graphic quality. : Enabled -Disable rendering of objects when not visible. (Occlusion Culling) : Disabled -Use low-detail models on distant objects to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Cache LOD data only when necessary. (LOD Streaming) : Disabled -Smooth edges. (Anti-aliasing) : Enabled -Increase transparent lighting quality. : Enabled -Grass Quality : High Shadows -Use low-detail models on shadows to increase performance. (LOD) : Disabled -Display : All -Shadow Resolution : High: 2048 pixels -Shadow Cascading : High -Shadow Softening : High Texture Detail -Texture Filtering : High -Anisotropic Filtering : High Effects -Naturally darken the edges of the screen. (Limb Darkening) : Enabled -Blur the graphics around an object in motion. (Radial Blur) : Enabled -Effects While in Motion : Display All -Screen Space Ambient Occlusion : High -Glare : Normal Cinematic Cutscenes -Enable depth of field. : Enabled System: Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit (6.1, Build 7601) Service Pack 1 (7601.win7sp1_gdr.130104-1431) Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570K CPU @ 3.40GHz 8143.758MB NVIDIA GeForce GTX 550 Ti(VRAM 4049 MB) 9.18.0013.1090 -I am looking for an Upgrade to my video card since it was kind of disappointed that I didn't get high enough but my video card has been with me for 2 - 3 years and 2 months ago i did those upgrade to my pc(except my HDD/Computer case/Video card) so i am looking for opinions which can give me that push to at least 5000 score and better frame rate with price range $130 - $210...it can be more if i really want to finish my gaming pc(my motherboard runs PCI express 3.0 if anything)- Edit: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814130825 this one looks good but i don't know if there are other options and cheaper and thanks for the help :3 Honestly Titox you could probably bank a 5000+ if you just tweak your settings. Bump down the resolution to 720 or so (no idea why it doesn't have 1440x900), turn on Occlusion Culling, low detail shadows, and turn off radial blur.
They are things you probably wouldn't even notice and will definitely bump up your score a fair bit. My wife scored a 4k+ with a GTX 440 at high settings on a lower resolution, so you should be fine. Edit: And in all honesty, I would just spend the extra $100 and go for either a 660 ti model or a 670 if you can afford it. You have the start of a nice rig, so might as well put a nice video card in it. And while you're looking at cards in the $300 range, might wanna check into a Radeon 7950. Fenrir.Weakness said: » Honestly Titox you could probably bank a 5000+ if you just tweak your settings. Bump down the resolution to 720 or so (no idea why it doesn't have 1440x900), turn on Occlusion Culling, low detail shadows, and turn off radial blur. They are things you probably wouldn't even notice and will definitely bump up your score a fair bit. My wife scored a 4k+ with a GTX 440 at high settings on a lower resolution, so you should be fine. Edit: And in all honesty, I would just spend the extra $100 and go for either a 660 ti model or a 670 if you can afford it. You have the start of a nice rig, so might as well put a nice video card in it. And while you're looking at cards in the $300 range, might wanna check into a Radeon 7950. I love everything with Maximum setting graphic while doing a great performance I will think about it.... since 300 bucks when i want to replace my second monitor....is kind of rough lol I will see ^^ thanks for the respond! This is terrible, an old computer I just finished getting to work again. This is everything at absolute lowest settings (I think). I think I need some serious upgrades to my processor, ram, and graphics card.
Cerberus.Ansime said: » This is terrible, an old computer I just finished getting to work again. This is everything at absolute lowest settings (I think). I think I need some serious upgrades to my processor, ram, and graphics card. just had to... YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
So I've never really been a pc fan, always a console guy. well I got a 8063 on 1920X1080 on max settings on my first go. then realized I havent updated drivers in awhile. So I updated the drivers on my gtx670 and restarted my computer and now i get around 7700...
Also I have a second gtx670 in the box unopened and didn't know if i should install it or sell it. FFxiv is probably the only thing ill run on my computer. and i will get ffxiv for the ps3 as well. Also will be buying a ps4 on release and i assume ffxiv will come to that too. (sometime next year i presume). So i think selling the gtx670 is the best choice. Leviathan.Phenomena said: » So I've never really been a pc fan, always a console guy. well I got a 8063 on 1920X1080 on max settings on my first go. then realized I havent updated drivers in awhile. So I updated the drivers on my gtx670 and restarted my computer and now i get around 7700... Also I have a second gtx670 in the box unopened and didn't know if i should install it or sell it. FFxiv is probably the only thing ill run on my computer. and i will get ffxiv for the ps3 as well. Also will be buying a ps4 on release and i assume ffxiv will come to that too. (sometime next year i presume). So i think selling the gtx670 is the best choice. Well i am a console guy too but i like to play FF on max graphic which here will be the PC XD, I am just picky <<; if they release it on PS4 then i will have it there too so i can change between 2 but i doubt it I will buy PS4 in release until they have my kind of games that i usually play(JRPG, Dynasty warriors, Fighting games, Some anime games, etc) Mostly in my PC...i just watch anime, run PS2/DS emulator, League of Legends, Starcraft 2, little random games, seeing livestream time to time, youtube, and maybe some special sell in Steam I like to have the best visual/performance when it comes to my Gaming/Anime and multitasking <3... Ragnarok.Titox said: » Leviathan.Phenomena said: » So I've never really been a pc fan, always a console guy. well I got a 8063 on 1920X1080 on max settings on my first go. then realized I havent updated drivers in awhile. So I updated the drivers on my gtx670 and restarted my computer and now i get around 7700... Also I have a second gtx670 in the box unopened and didn't know if i should install it or sell it. FFxiv is probably the only thing ill run on my computer. and i will get ffxiv for the ps3 as well. Also will be buying a ps4 on release and i assume ffxiv will come to that too. (sometime next year i presume). So i think selling the gtx670 is the best choice. Well i am a console guy too but i like to play FF on max graphic which here will be the PC XD, I am just picky <<; if they release it on PS4 then i will have it there too so i can change between 2 but i doubt it I will buy PS4 in release until they have my kind of games that i usually play(JRPG, Dynasty warriors, Fighting games, Some anime games, etc) Mostly in my PC...i just watch anime, run PS2/DS emulator, League of Legends, Starcraft 2, little random games, seeing livestream time to time, youtube, and maybe some special sell in Steam I like to have the best visual/performance when it comes to my Gaming/Anime and multitasking <3... I'm going to assume that the ps4 can run ffxiv on max setting no prob. the ps3 looks really good already and the ps4 is a lot more powerful. Think im going to just sell my secon 670. but the game looks beautiful!
[+]
Default setting
1280x720 Medium 13148 1920x1080 Maximum 4033 - 4256 i7 - 3770k 16 GB ram geforce gtx 470 If you guys are looking for a decent upgrade the 7870 tahiti le cards are back in stock at newegg http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814131484 the coupon still works too PWCHD7850 brings it to around 209. If you don't know what this card is it's basically a low binned 7950/7970 on a 7870 board. would probably recommend having at least 500 to 550 w power supply.
Looks like it just sold out. I keep getting an error when I open my benchmark. But I also got an error on my computer many years ago when I did the ffxi benchmark and it worked ok. Tried to google the error and I didn't see anything.
 Does this mean I can't, no way in heck, run FF14? Looks like a registry error?
Quetzalcoatl.Bluefrost said: » I keep getting an error when I open my benchmark. But I also got an error on my computer many years ago when I did the ffxi benchmark and it worked ok. Tried to google the error and I didn't see anything. Does this mean I can't, no way in heck, run FF14? Download DX and download windows updates and it should work that what happen to my gf rig. FINAL FANTASY XIV: A Realm Reborn Official Benchmark (Exploration)
Tested on:2/27/2013 11:01:45 PM Score:7291 Average Framerate:61.459 Performance:Extremely High -Easily capable of running the game on the highest settings. Screen Size: 1920x1080 Graphics Presets: Maximum Intel Core i5 @4.3gHz 8Gb Ram 2gb Gtx 660 ti Inel M4 SSD Raid0 |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.