|
The great debate: Casey Anonthy
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 14155
By Valefor.Slipispsycho 2011-07-18 20:46:11
Ramuh.Haseyo said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: Ramuh.Krizz said: Wait, this thread is still alive? Inb4 really tasteless, bad joke.. I know it's coming..
You practically just said it. No I didn't.. I mentioned an inevitability.
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2011-07-18 20:46:46
Carbuncle.Flionheart said: I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.
Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 20:50:08
Carbuncle.Flionheart said: I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.
it's not really a matter of control, the system prevailed, justice may not have.
The system (here anyway) is designed around the idea "innocent until proven guilty, the prosecution lacked said proof is all.
Despite people's radicals emotions, this was the only right conclusion to how the case was tried, if the prosecution would have done their job properly (and more than likely came from a different angle) she hopefully wouldn't be free now.
IMO: they should have proven negligence (which from what I've seen of it, they could have proven) and tried for negligent homicide, and it's max penalty.
Not murder, and the death penalty. Prosecution screwed up.
By Smackbones 2011-07-18 20:50:48
Ragnarok.Nausi said: Carbuncle.Flionheart said: I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.
Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.
Without sufficient proof I assume? Way to get a gold star.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 20:51:39
Ragnarok.Nausi said: Carbuncle.Flionheart said: I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.
Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.
defense should have never allowed you on a jury...
Carbuncle.Flionheart
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1759
By Carbuncle.Flionheart 2011-07-18 20:51:45
Ragnarok.Nausi said: Carbuncle.Flionheart said: I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.
Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.
So glad I don't live in the same country as you.
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-18 21:06:29
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Ragnarok.Nausi said: Carbuncle.Flionheart said: I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.
Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.
defense should have never allowed you on a jury... So that's how you get out of jury duty. Lol good back up plan to being racist.
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2011-07-18 21:11:41
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: Quote: This proves that Caylee's corpse was at one time in her trunk. you don't know the different between "proves" and "suggests", lol
Quote: Proves she had the ability to do it does it not A lot of people had the ability to do it, also.
Quote: Ok so to you, the Med. examiner's opinion isn't good enough? How about the fact that she was found wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags? Please give me a plausible action where the little girl dies due to an accident and the body is thrown away in such a manner, an not reported. Also most places don't have readily accessible members of CSI or BONES to give you a comprehensive explanation. Also if Casey performed CPR on her, why wouldn't she tell anyone? Casey being found wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags proves that she was wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags.
Manslaughter and negligence, amongst other things resulting in death still gives the fear of substantial jail time. Who knows, maybe something other than a murder did happen, something that scared her and that she felt the need to cover it up.
Quote: Is there any evidence or indication of that? I suppose aliens could have done it too... NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE No, that's why "could" was used.
Quote: This proves that Caylee's corpse was at one time in her trunk. You place so much faith in forensic analysis except when they support guilt? If it was an accident, why wouldn't she tell anyone? Please some other reason aside from her alleged molesting father told her to keep her mouth shut. Not at all, it proves there was a body, which species wasn't even able to be verified was in her trunk. I already explained the accident scenario earlier in my post. You assume everyone would act the same way in an accident
Quote: Still happened, and it's not in dispute. It suggests that chloroform could have be used and in the end, and in the end, trace amounts of it were found in the trunk of her car where Caylee's dead body was as well. That seems like a pretty lucky guess to me Yes, you're right, it's very suggestive. Suggestive doesn't prove anything, moving on.
Quote: Casey now caims that Caylee drowned in the pool, if it was an accident why didn't she tell anyone? How can you take her accusation of him being a child molester over his claim he isn't one? Isn't it all that just a he/said she/said thing at this point? You keep bringing up the same point. Again, not everyone reacts the same to everything. "I don't think she would have acted this way if it was an accident, so it wasn't". That's supposed to be proof? lmao
Quote: Your computer doesn't randomly search for it over 60 times. I guess someone else could have searched for it that many times but isn't that a bit of a stretch? If your boyfriend's computer was searching for porno would you be so ready to believe it was in legitimate error? Again, suggestive=/=proof
I wish you all could hear yourselves. 'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?' Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is entirely subjective, you're standards for connecting the dots are simply unreasonable.
If Casey didn't kill her, who did?
If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.
Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable.
Cerberus.Eugene
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6999
By Cerberus.Eugene 2011-07-18 21:12:54
Pointless debate is pointless. Everyone loses an internet argument.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:19:59
Ragnarok.Nausi said: Sylph.Tigerwoods said: Quote: This proves that Caylee's corpse was at one time in her trunk. you don't know the different between "proves" and "suggests", lol
Quote: Proves she had the ability to do it does it not A lot of people had the ability to do it, also.
Quote: Ok so to you, the Med. examiner's opinion isn't good enough? How about the fact that she was found wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags? Please give me a plausible action where the little girl dies due to an accident and the body is thrown away in such a manner, an not reported. Also most places don't have readily accessible members of CSI or BONES to give you a comprehensive explanation. Also if Casey performed CPR on her, why wouldn't she tell anyone? Casey being found wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags proves that she was wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags.
Manslaughter and negligence, amongst other things resulting in death still gives the fear of substantial jail time. Who knows, maybe something other than a murder did happen, something that scared her and that she felt the need to cover it up.
Quote: Is there any evidence or indication of that? I suppose aliens could have done it too... NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE No, that's why "could" was used.
Quote: This proves that Caylee's corpse was at one time in her trunk. You place so much faith in forensic analysis except when they support guilt? If it was an accident, why wouldn't she tell anyone? Please some other reason aside from her alleged molesting father told her to keep her mouth shut. Not at all, it proves there was a body, which species wasn't even able to be verified was in her trunk. I already explained the accident scenario earlier in my post. You assume everyone would act the same way in an accident
Quote: Still happened, and it's not in dispute. It suggests that chloroform could have be used and in the end, and in the end, trace amounts of it were found in the trunk of her car where Caylee's dead body was as well. That seems like a pretty lucky guess to me Yes, you're right, it's very suggestive. Suggestive doesn't prove anything, moving on.
Quote: Casey now caims that Caylee drowned in the pool, if it was an accident why didn't she tell anyone? How can you take her accusation of him being a child molester over his claim he isn't one? Isn't it all that just a he/said she/said thing at this point? You keep bringing up the same point. Again, not everyone reacts the same to everything. "I don't think she would have acted this way if it was an accident, so it wasn't". That's supposed to be proof? lmao
Quote: Your computer doesn't randomly search for it over 60 times. I guess someone else could have searched for it that many times but isn't that a bit of a stretch? If your boyfriend's computer was searching for porno would you be so ready to believe it was in legitimate error? Again, suggestive=/=proof
I wish you all could hear yourselves. 'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?' Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is entirely subjective, you're standards for connecting the dots are simply unreasonable.
If Casey didn't kill her, who did?
If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.
Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable.
circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...
if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.
Caitsith.Zefiris
Server: Caitsith
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2401
By Caitsith.Zefiris 2011-07-18 21:23:24
Nausi, all that stuff proves that Caylee died, and Casey was aware of her death. It doesn't prove that she killed her. I honestly think she should get more jail time, not only for lying to police, but for child abuse and/or neglect.
Cerberus.Eugene
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6999
By Cerberus.Eugene 2011-07-18 21:24:18
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...
if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.
false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.
The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.
not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:26:27
Cerberus.Eugene said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...
if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.
false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.
The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.
not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.
from what I've seen of it, there wasn't enough for a conviction, but I've only read post decision.
I wasn't there so meh.
As for circumstantial evidence being enough to convict, if the defense is poor and prosecution is great, probably, doesn't mean it should.
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-18 21:27:20
Quote: 'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?' I never said Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk. If they were able to prove that she was, I'm sure the verdict would have been different.
Quote: If Casey didn't kill her, who did? Maybe you? I don't know. That's the point, we don't know who killed her.
Quote: If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.
1000 to 1, that means there's still a chance it was an accident, and that's if you can even prove Casey was involved in the first place with the murder/accident itself and didn't find out about it postmortem and wasn't trying to cover up for someone else.
Quote: Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1. Again 1000 to 1 still means there's a chance, and it wasn't even established that she's the one who hid the body to begin with.
Quote: If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1. That's a big "if".
Quote: You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable. Prosecution overreached, blame them. They could have easily gotten her for negligence.
By Smackbones 2011-07-18 21:29:49
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: Prosecution overreached, blame them. They could have easily gotten her for negligence.
Cerberus.Eugene
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6999
By Cerberus.Eugene 2011-07-18 21:32:26
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Eugene said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...
if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.
false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.
The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.
not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.
from what I've seen of it, there wasn't enough for a conviction, but I've only read post decision.
I wasn't there so meh.
As for circumstantial evidence being enough to convict, if the defense is poor and prosecution is great, probably, doesn't mean it should.
Not saying that circumstantial evidence was enough in this case, but you might be right that truly circumstantial testimony may require a prohibitively high burden of proof to convict.
However, motive, opportunity, circumstantial evidence, and physical evidence that isn't entirely conclusive on its own might be enough if all the other evidence is enough to strengthen the weak physical evidence.
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2011-07-18 21:42:07
Tiger, where u been? They found a hair strand from Caylee inside the trunk. The analytic conclusion was that it was from AFTER she had died.
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 491
By Sylph.Nephriel 2011-07-18 21:44:26
Ragnarok.Nausi said: Tiger, where u been? They found a hair strand from Caylee inside the trunk. The analytic conclusion was that it was from AFTER she had died.
That would still only place Caylee in her trunk. That does not mean she killed her which is what the prosecution was after.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:46:20
Cerberus.Eugene said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Eugene said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...
if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.
false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.
The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.
not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.
from what I've seen of it, there wasn't enough for a conviction, but I've only read post decision.
I wasn't there so meh.
As for circumstantial evidence being enough to convict, if the defense is poor and prosecution is great, probably, doesn't mean it should.
Not saying that circumstantial evidence was enough in this case, but you might be right that truly circumstantial testimony may require a prohibitively high burden of proof to convict.
However, motive, opportunity, circumstantial evidence, and physical evidence that isn't entirely conclusive on its own might be enough if all the other evidence is enough to strengthen the weak physical evidence.
Indeed, the dots here weren't enough though...
IMO anyway...
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-18 21:52:43
Ragnarok.Nausi said: Tiger, where u been? They found a hair strand from Caylee inside the trunk. The analytic conclusion was that it was from AFTER she had died. Unless they retracted it, I'm pretty sure I remember them saying they found a hair but were UNABLE TO confirm who it belonged to.
Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2011-07-18 21:54:03
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Ragnarok.Nausi said: Carbuncle.Flionheart said: I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.
Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.
defense should have never allowed you on a jury...
Exactly what I was thinking. Nasui clearly has no respect for the processes of the judiciary system.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:59:44
Hmm I have a paper due in the morning, I wonder if I could write it on the judiciary process, unfortunately I don't have the patience for that...
Blegh.
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-19 07:35:17
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Casey’s computer was repeatedly used to surf websites giving instructions on how to make chloroform.
Quote: ORLANDO, Fla. -- A software designer says its inaccurate data may have led to false assertions made by prosecutors about key evidence in the Casey Anthony trial, according to the New York Times.
The newspaper reports that software designer John Bradley said data about extensive computer searches on the word “chloroform” is misleading. Prosecutors claimed Anthony used the word 84 times in searches on the Anthony family computer, but Bradley now says the website in question was visited only one time.
Bradley, who designed the software CacheBack, said he immediately informed prosecutors and the police about the software's inaccurate data.
For the full story, visit the nytimes.com.
http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/28593647/detail.html?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=casey+updates
and if you'd prefer the much longer, NY Times version,
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/us/19casey.html?_r=2
By Pooman 2011-07-19 08:09:01
Ragnarok.Nausi said: Sylph.Tigerwoods said: Quote: This proves that Caylee's corpse was at one time in her trunk. you don't know the different between "proves" and "suggests", lol
Quote: Proves she had the ability to do it does it not A lot of people had the ability to do it, also.
Quote: Ok so to you, the Med. examiner's opinion isn't good enough? How about the fact that she was found wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags? Please give me a plausible action where the little girl dies due to an accident and the body is thrown away in such a manner, an not reported. Also most places don't have readily accessible members of CSI or BONES to give you a comprehensive explanation. Also if Casey performed CPR on her, why wouldn't she tell anyone? Casey being found wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags proves that she was wrapped up in duct tape and garbage bags.
Manslaughter and negligence, amongst other things resulting in death still gives the fear of substantial jail time. Who knows, maybe something other than a murder did happen, something that scared her and that she felt the need to cover it up.
Quote: Is there any evidence or indication of that? I suppose aliens could have done it too... NO ONE KNOWS FOR SURE No, that's why "could" was used.
Quote: This proves that Caylee's corpse was at one time in her trunk. You place so much faith in forensic analysis except when they support guilt? If it was an accident, why wouldn't she tell anyone? Please some other reason aside from her alleged molesting father told her to keep her mouth shut. Not at all, it proves there was a body, which species wasn't even able to be verified was in her trunk. I already explained the accident scenario earlier in my post. You assume everyone would act the same way in an accident
Quote: Still happened, and it's not in dispute. It suggests that chloroform could have be used and in the end, and in the end, trace amounts of it were found in the trunk of her car where Caylee's dead body was as well. That seems like a pretty lucky guess to me Yes, you're right, it's very suggestive. Suggestive doesn't prove anything, moving on.
Quote: Casey now caims that Caylee drowned in the pool, if it was an accident why didn't she tell anyone? How can you take her accusation of him being a child molester over his claim he isn't one? Isn't it all that just a he/said she/said thing at this point? You keep bringing up the same point. Again, not everyone reacts the same to everything. "I don't think she would have acted this way if it was an accident, so it wasn't". That's supposed to be proof? lmao
Quote: Your computer doesn't randomly search for it over 60 times. I guess someone else could have searched for it that many times but isn't that a bit of a stretch? If your boyfriend's computer was searching for porno would you be so ready to believe it was in legitimate error? Again, suggestive=/=proof
I wish you all could hear yourselves. 'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?' Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is entirely subjective, you're standards for connecting the dots are simply unreasonable.
If Casey didn't kill her, who did?
If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.
Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable.
Wow you're stupid.
Lakshmi.Jesi
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 576
By Lakshmi.Jesi 2011-07-19 08:36:22
The prosecution was stupid and went for murder one.
There wasn't enough evidence to convict for murder one. No matter how strong you think circumstantial evidence is, it wasn't strong enough.
End of story.
[+]
Bahamut.Danthebk
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 198
By Bahamut.Danthebk 2011-07-19 08:47:23
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: Choloroform search stuff.
To tack onto this, it was also mentioned during the case that the search itself came right after viewing a comic on myspace drawn by a friend of hers where the punchline had to do with choloroform.
Yay for false logic by the American people!
[+]
Phoenix.Vael
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 384
By Phoenix.Vael 2011-07-19 09:29:09
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: Ragnarok.Nausi said: Casey’s computer was repeatedly used to surf websites giving instructions on how to make chloroform. Quote: ORLANDO, Fla. -- A software designer says its inaccurate data may have led to false assertions made by prosecutors about key evidence in the Casey Anthony trial, according to the New York Times. The newspaper reports that software designer John Bradley said data about extensive computer searches on the word “chloroform” is misleading. Prosecutors claimed Anthony used the word 84 times in searches on the Anthony family computer, but Bradley now says the website in question was visited only one time. Bradley, who designed the software CacheBack, said he immediately informed prosecutors and the police about the software's inaccurate data. For the full story, visit the nytimes.com. http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/28593647/detail.html?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=casey+updates and if you'd prefer the much longer, NY Times version, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/us/19casey.html?_r=2
Holy crap why didn't I look up how to make chloroform on the Internet before.
I am getting so laid tonight.
[+]
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 574
By Fenrir.Moldtech 2011-07-22 00:30:40
Thepeopleofwalmart.com found her!
She has dyed her hair blonde and has another child!
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 825
By Fenrir.Skadoosh 2011-07-22 00:42:17
good find moldtech lol
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-29 20:41:16
Officially innocent, thoughts?
|
|