The Great Debate: Casey Anonthy

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
Version 3.1
New Items
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Chatterbox » The great debate: Casey Anonthy
The great debate: Casey Anonthy
First Page 2 3 ... 9 10
 Valefor.Slipispsycho
Offline
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 14155
By Valefor.Slipispsycho 2011-07-18 20:46:11
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ramuh.Haseyo said:
Valefor.Slipispsycho said:
Ramuh.Krizz said:
Wait, this thread is still alive?
Inb4 really tasteless, bad joke.. I know it's coming..

You practically just said it.
No I didn't.. I mentioned an inevitability.
 Ragnarok.Nausi
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Nausi
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2011-07-18 20:46:46
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Carbuncle.Flionheart said:
I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.


Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 20:50:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Carbuncle.Flionheart said:
I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.

it's not really a matter of control, the system prevailed, justice may not have.

The system (here anyway) is designed around the idea "innocent until proven guilty, the prosecution lacked said proof is all.

Despite people's radicals emotions, this was the only right conclusion to how the case was tried, if the prosecution would have done their job properly (and more than likely came from a different angle) she hopefully wouldn't be free now.

IMO: they should have proven negligence (which from what I've seen of it, they could have proven) and tried for negligent homicide, and it's max penalty.

Not murder, and the death penalty. Prosecution screwed up.
Offline
Posts: 65
By Smackbones 2011-07-18 20:50:48
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Carbuncle.Flionheart said:
I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.


Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.

Without sufficient proof I assume? Way to get a gold star.
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 20:51:39
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Carbuncle.Flionheart said:
I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.


Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.

defense should have never allowed you on a jury...
 Carbuncle.Flionheart
Offline
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1759
By Carbuncle.Flionheart 2011-07-18 20:51:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Carbuncle.Flionheart said:
I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.


Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.

So glad I don't live in the same country as you.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-18 21:06:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Carbuncle.Flionheart said:
I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.


Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.

defense should have never allowed you on a jury...
So that's how you get out of jury duty. Lol good back up plan to being racist.
 Ragnarok.Nausi
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Nausi
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2011-07-18 21:11:41
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said:

I wish you all could hear yourselves. 'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?' Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is entirely subjective, you're standards for connecting the dots are simply unreasonable.

If Casey didn't kill her, who did?

If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.

Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.

If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.

You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable.
 Cerberus.Eugene
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Eugene
Posts: 6999
By Cerberus.Eugene 2011-07-18 21:12:54
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Pointless debate is pointless. Everyone loses an internet argument.
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:19:59
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Sylph.Tigerwoods said:

I wish you all could hear yourselves. 'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?' Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is entirely subjective, you're standards for connecting the dots are simply unreasonable.

If Casey didn't kill her, who did?

If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.

Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.

If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.

You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable.

circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...

if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.
 Caitsith.Zefiris
Offline
Server: Caitsith
Game: FFXI
user: Zefiris
Posts: 2401
By Caitsith.Zefiris 2011-07-18 21:23:24
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Nausi, all that stuff proves that Caylee died, and Casey was aware of her death. It doesn't prove that she killed her. I honestly think she should get more jail time, not only for lying to police, but for child abuse and/or neglect.
 Cerberus.Eugene
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Eugene
Posts: 6999
By Cerberus.Eugene 2011-07-18 21:24:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:

circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...

if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.

false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.

The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.

not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:26:27
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Eugene said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:

circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...

if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.

false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.

The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.

not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.

from what I've seen of it, there wasn't enough for a conviction, but I've only read post decision.

I wasn't there so meh.

As for circumstantial evidence being enough to convict, if the defense is poor and prosecution is great, probably, doesn't mean it should.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-18 21:27:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quote:
'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?'
I never said Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk. If they were able to prove that she was, I'm sure the verdict would have been different.

Quote:
If Casey didn't kill her, who did?
Maybe you? I don't know. That's the point, we don't know who killed her.

Quote:
If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.
1000 to 1, that means there's still a chance it was an accident, and that's if you can even prove Casey was involved in the first place with the murder/accident itself and didn't find out about it postmortem and wasn't trying to cover up for someone else.

Quote:
Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
Again 1000 to 1 still means there's a chance, and it wasn't even established that she's the one who hid the body to begin with.

Quote:
If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.
That's a big "if".

Quote:
You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable.
Prosecution overreached, blame them. They could have easily gotten her for negligence.
Offline
Posts: 65
By Smackbones 2011-07-18 21:29:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said:
Prosecution overreached, blame them. They could have easily gotten her for negligence.
 Cerberus.Eugene
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Eugene
Posts: 6999
By Cerberus.Eugene 2011-07-18 21:32:26
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Eugene said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:

circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...

if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.

false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.

The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.

not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.

from what I've seen of it, there wasn't enough for a conviction, but I've only read post decision.

I wasn't there so meh.

As for circumstantial evidence being enough to convict, if the defense is poor and prosecution is great, probably, doesn't mean it should.

Not saying that circumstantial evidence was enough in this case, but you might be right that truly circumstantial testimony may require a prohibitively high burden of proof to convict.

However, motive, opportunity, circumstantial evidence, and physical evidence that isn't entirely conclusive on its own might be enough if all the other evidence is enough to strengthen the weak physical evidence.
 Ragnarok.Nausi
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Nausi
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2011-07-18 21:42:07
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Tiger, where u been? They found a hair strand from Caylee inside the trunk. The analytic conclusion was that it was from AFTER she had died.
 Sylph.Nephriel
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Nephriel
Posts: 491
By Sylph.Nephriel 2011-07-18 21:44:26
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Tiger, where u been? They found a hair strand from Caylee inside the trunk. The analytic conclusion was that it was from AFTER she had died.

That would still only place Caylee in her trunk. That does not mean she killed her which is what the prosecution was after.
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:46:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Eugene said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Cerberus.Eugene said:
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:

circumstantial evidence isn't real evidence, they needed something substantial, there was nothing...

if there was, there wouldn't be reasonable doubt.

false. enough circumstantial evidence can certainly be enough to convict.

The prosecutor possibly had enough evidence to bring about a conviction. Arguably he just botched the delivery and focused on the wrong evidence. And well, trials are very much about perception.

not saying I really know what happened either way. just saying arguing that you know what's up won't change anything.

from what I've seen of it, there wasn't enough for a conviction, but I've only read post decision.

I wasn't there so meh.

As for circumstantial evidence being enough to convict, if the defense is poor and prosecution is great, probably, doesn't mean it should.

Not saying that circumstantial evidence was enough in this case, but you might be right that truly circumstantial testimony may require a prohibitively high burden of proof to convict.

However, motive, opportunity, circumstantial evidence, and physical evidence that isn't entirely conclusive on its own might be enough if all the other evidence is enough to strengthen the weak physical evidence.

Indeed, the dots here weren't enough though...

IMO anyway...
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-18 21:52:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Tiger, where u been? They found a hair strand from Caylee inside the trunk. The analytic conclusion was that it was from AFTER she had died.
Unless they retracted it, I'm pretty sure I remember them saying they found a hair but were UNABLE TO confirm who it belonged to.
 Quetzalcoatl.Xueye
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
user: Sect
Posts: 6386
By Quetzalcoatl.Xueye 2011-07-18 21:54:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Jetackuu said:
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Carbuncle.Flionheart said:
I'm glad some of you people aren't in control of the justice system.


Sorry to disappoint you but I've actually been on a jury and voted someone guilty.

defense should have never allowed you on a jury...

Exactly what I was thinking. Nasui clearly has no respect for the processes of the judiciary system.
 Bahamut.Jetackuu
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Jetackuu
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-07-18 21:59:44
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Hmm I have a paper due in the morning, I wonder if I could write it on the judiciary process, unfortunately I don't have the patience for that...

Blegh.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-19 07:35:17
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:


Casey’s computer was repeatedly used to surf websites giving instructions on how to make chloroform.
Quote:
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A software designer says its inaccurate data may have led to false assertions made by prosecutors about key evidence in the Casey Anthony trial, according to the New York Times.

The newspaper reports that software designer John Bradley said data about extensive computer searches on the word “chloroform” is misleading. Prosecutors claimed Anthony used the word 84 times in searches on the Anthony family computer, but Bradley now says the website in question was visited only one time.

Bradley, who designed the software CacheBack, said he immediately informed prosecutors and the police about the software's inaccurate data.

For the full story, visit the nytimes.com.


http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/28593647/detail.html?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=casey+updates

and if you'd prefer the much longer, NY Times version,
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/us/19casey.html?_r=2
Offline
Posts: 467
By Pooman 2011-07-19 08:09:01
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Sylph.Tigerwoods said:

I wish you all could hear yourselves. 'Sure Caylee was dead in the back of Casey's trunk, but where's the evidence that makes you think Casey had anything to do with it?' Proof beyond a reasonable doubt is entirely subjective, you're standards for connecting the dots are simply unreasonable.

If Casey didn't kill her, who did?

If Casey killed her and it was an accident, why didn't she tell anyone? Please name a few cases where accidental deaths weren't initially reported and were still proven to be accidents. I bet I can outnumber you and name homicides that weren't reported at least 1000 to 1.

Do you really think that someone would go through all that trouble to hide the body if it was an accident? Please name a few other examples where people have hidden bodies and were in the end innocent. I bet I could again outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.

If Caylee's dead body was in the trunk of Casey's car please list similar cases where the owner of a car (Casey) had their cars involved in deaths/murders and were legitimately ignorant of it. Again I bet I could outnumber you at least 1000 to 1.

You guys keep hanging your "unreasonable doubt" on things that aren't very reasonable.

Wow you're stupid.
 Lakshmi.Jesi
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: Jesi
Posts: 576
By Lakshmi.Jesi 2011-07-19 08:36:22
Link | Quote | Reply
 
The prosecution was stupid and went for murder one.

There wasn't enough evidence to convict for murder one. No matter how strong you think circumstantial evidence is, it wasn't strong enough.

End of story.
[+]
 Bahamut.Danthebk
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: danthebk
Posts: 198
By Bahamut.Danthebk 2011-07-19 08:47:23
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said:
Choloroform search stuff.

To tack onto this, it was also mentioned during the case that the search itself came right after viewing a comic on myspace drawn by a friend of hers where the punchline had to do with choloroform.

Yay for false logic by the American people!
[+]
 Phoenix.Vael
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
user: Vale
Posts: 384
By Phoenix.Vael 2011-07-19 09:29:09
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said:
Ragnarok.Nausi said:
Casey’s computer was repeatedly used to surf websites giving instructions on how to make chloroform.
Quote:
ORLANDO, Fla. -- A software designer says its inaccurate data may have led to false assertions made by prosecutors about key evidence in the Casey Anthony trial, according to the New York Times. The newspaper reports that software designer John Bradley said data about extensive computer searches on the word “chloroform” is misleading. Prosecutors claimed Anthony used the word 84 times in searches on the Anthony family computer, but Bradley now says the website in question was visited only one time. Bradley, who designed the software CacheBack, said he immediately informed prosecutors and the police about the software's inaccurate data. For the full story, visit the nytimes.com.
http://www.wesh.com/casey-anthony-extended-coverage/28593647/detail.html?utm_source=manual&utm_medium=facebook&utm_campaign=casey+updates and if you'd prefer the much longer, NY Times version, http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/19/us/19casey.html?_r=2

Holy crap why didn't I look up how to make chloroform on the Internet before.

I am getting so laid tonight.
[+]
 Fenrir.Moldtech
Offline
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Moldtech
Posts: 574
By Fenrir.Moldtech 2011-07-22 00:30:40
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Thepeopleofwalmart.com found her!

She has dyed her hair blonde and has another child!

 Fenrir.Skadoosh
Offline
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
Posts: 825
By Fenrir.Skadoosh 2011-07-22 00:42:17
Link | Quote | Reply
 
good find moldtech lol
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15065
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2011-07-29 20:41:16
Link | Quote | Reply
 
First Page 2 3 ... 9 10