|
Spanking of childrens
Cerberus.Zandra
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 736
By Cerberus.Zandra 2011-06-20 00:02:33
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2821
By Odin.Sheelay 2011-06-20 00:02:57
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Leviathan.Hohenheim said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Asura.Vyre said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed. More like Texas is flawed. Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil. Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards. Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault. No, it's a defense of your property and livelihood. It's actualyl a common law across the USA and is widely accepted. It's civil. Especially when said person is trying to steal your car, set your house on fire, and do other malicious things etc.
Unless it's to protect life, use of deadly force is illegal in just about all of those places (to be checked) and any place that it's not, is *** backwards.
It's definitely far from civil to possibly kill somebody unless it's to protect life.
Say your kid was drunk and going to go driving (they're at home with you atm, say they walked home drunk), and they wouldn't listen to you no matter what you would do, they were determined to push past you and get to a vehicle. Would it be legal to "assault" them to keep them in the house and potentially protect their life?
/insert that dinosaur scratching his head meme
Yes. Call the police, like a civilized person with a domestic dispute.
In the US, I'd be concerned that scenario could easily turn into some really absurd lawsuit or arrest.
Seriously, if I were to try and prevent someone I care for from doing something explicitly idiotic such as driving out while wasted on alcohol, I'd simply take and keep the keys. /problom? Tell me about it tomorrow morning.
But honestly, this has nothing to do with the Topic, which started off with some simple /spanking on kids. No punching. No beating. Just a spank. Why even push beyond that concept if not to cause drama?
Leviathan.Hohenheim
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3351
By Leviathan.Hohenheim 2011-06-20 00:03:54
Odin.Sheelay said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Leviathan.Hohenheim said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Asura.Vyre said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed. More like Texas is flawed. Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil. Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards. Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault. No, it's a defense of your property and livelihood. It's actualyl a common law across the USA and is widely accepted. It's civil. Especially when said person is trying to steal your car, set your house on fire, and do other malicious things etc.
Unless it's to protect life, use of deadly force is illegal in just about all of those places (to be checked) and any place that it's not, is *** backwards.
It's definitely far from civil to possibly kill somebody unless it's to protect life.
Say your kid was drunk and going to go driving (they're at home with you atm, say they walked home drunk), and they wouldn't listen to you no matter what you would do, they were determined to push past you and get to a vehicle. Would it be legal to "assault" them to keep them in the house and potentially protect their life?
/insert that dinosaur scratching his head meme
Yes. Call the police, like a civilized person with a domestic dispute.
In the US, I'd be concerned that scenario could easily turn into some really absurd lawsuit or arrest.
Seriously, if I were to try and prevent someone I care for from doing something explicitly idiotic such as driving out while wasted on alcohol, I'd simply take and keep the keys. /problom? Tell me about it tomorrow morning.
But honestly, this has nothing to do with the Topic, which started off with some simple /spanking on kids. No punching. No beating. Just a spank. Why even push beyond that concept if not to cause drama?
b/c ppl like to cause drama, esp. jetacku and spanking.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:03:59
Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 208
By Shiva.Durtiesweat 2011-06-20 00:06:35
Valefor.Slipispsycho said: <_<
It's a last resort, but I don't feel it should be outlawed.. I've only spanked my son a couple of times. I have lots of other methods of 'persuasion' to get him to act right, that usually works.
Besides if you do it all the time, it loses it's effectiveness. They just get used to it.
Absolutely, this is coming from a parent not just a mother/father.
I used to ask myself wwjd but i figured, huh... how the hell would he know he never bless us with parenting a child... Right? So for humanities sake *see quoted text*
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:06:51
Odin.Sheelay said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Leviathan.Hohenheim said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Asura.Vyre said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed. More like Texas is flawed. Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil. Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards. Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault. No, it's a defense of your property and livelihood. It's actualyl a common law across the USA and is widely accepted. It's civil. Especially when said person is trying to steal your car, set your house on fire, and do other malicious things etc.
Unless it's to protect life, use of deadly force is illegal in just about all of those places (to be checked) and any place that it's not, is *** backwards.
It's definitely far from civil to possibly kill somebody unless it's to protect life.
Say your kid was drunk and going to go driving (they're at home with you atm, say they walked home drunk), and they wouldn't listen to you no matter what you would do, they were determined to push past you and get to a vehicle. Would it be legal to "assault" them to keep them in the house and potentially protect their life?
/insert that dinosaur scratching his head meme
Yes. Call the police, like a civilized person with a domestic dispute.
In the US, I'd be concerned that scenario could easily turn into some really absurd lawsuit or arrest.
Seriously, if I were to try and prevent someone I care for from doing something explicitly idiotic such as driving out while wasted on alcohol, I'd simply take and keep the keys. /problom? Tell me about it tomorrow morning.
But honestly, this has nothing to do with the Topic, which started off with some simple /spanking on kids. No punching. No beating. Just a spank. Why even push beyond that concept if not to cause drama?
Because other people brought it up because they are trying to justify assaulting their children by claiming it's "helping them".
Cerberus.Zandra
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 736
By Cerberus.Zandra 2011-06-20 00:06:54
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
You can think its unacceptable all you want, but according to common law its quite acceptable. How long should you wait to find out someone is out to kill you? Can you only shoot them after you get stabbed/shot?
EDIT: being on your property without your permission is enough to classify them as an immediate threat.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2011-06-20 00:07:26
Leviathan.Hohenheim said: Leviathan.Chaosx said: Leviathan.Hohenheim said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Asura.Vyre said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed. More like Texas is flawed. Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil. Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards. Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault. No, it's a defense of your property and livelihood. It's actualyl a common law across the USA and is widely accepted. It's civil. Especially when said person is trying to steal your car, set your house on fire, and do other malicious things etc.
Unless it's to protect life, use of deadly force is illegal in just about all of those places (to be checked) and any place that it's not, is *** backwards.
It's definitely far from civil to possibly kill somebody unless it's to protect life.
Say your kid was drunk and going to go driving (they're at home with you atm, say they walked home drunk), and they wouldn't listen to you no matter what you would do, they were determined to push past you and get to a vehicle. Would it be legal to "assault" them to keep them in the house and potentially protect their life?
/insert that dinosaur scratching his head meme Why is your kid drinking?! That's like illegal man.
(Assuming teenager)
idk, they were somewhere else, drank, and got a ride home or something, who knows. Not very good parenting if you don't know where you kid went and what they're doing.
/sarcasm
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:14:17
Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
You can think its unacceptable all you want, but according to common law its quite acceptable. How long should you wait to find out someone is out to kill you? Can you only shoot them after you get stabbed/shot?
EDIT: being on your property without your permission is enough to classify them as an immediate threat.
Depends on the area, and at least in Virginia we're not backwards enough to not require that they must pose an immediate threat.
as for your edit, no it isn't.
By zahrah 2011-06-20 00:20:39
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
So, if someone were to break into my house, to rob the place, and then rape me that's acceptable?
Let's not be concerned with the fact that I could have prevented it by defending myself. If you're going to suggest hand-to-hand. I'm 5'7" and 116 pounds.
Bahamut.Bizarro
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 231
By Bahamut.Bizarro 2011-06-20 00:24:08
Our 1st child was born and my wife SWORE she would never spank her. When the occasion warranted it I had no problem with a swift 1 or 2 quick swats to the rear.
At about the age of 3 my family was out somewhere and I had wandered off to within earshot but out of visual range. I heard my wife give the "do you want a time out?" speech about 3 times, time outs were the punishment of choice for Mrs. Bizzy, and yet my daughter continued to misbehave. As I rounded the corner I simply said if she didn't behave I would spank her. INSTANT attitude reversal and manner change.
Baffled my wife asked me, "Why does she always listen to you and never me? I don't understand." etc etc. My immediate answer was that I had spanked her before, she knew I would do it, and didn't want it again. ~2 weeks later after a few very gentle spankings later my wife got the same instant behavior change too. Did she change her mind? Hell yes she did.
Call it fear, call it abuse, call it whatever you want. Even 1 generation ago children/teens taking knives or other weapons to school NEVER happened. Kids pulling half the stunts they pull now NEVER happened. They would simply not do it cause they KNEW they would be in a world of **it when Dad found out about it. Now go back further to 2 or 3 generations and the change in child behavior is even more drastic.
Now our son, he gives a rats tail if u spank him. For him, the time outs work better. Recent events form a perfect example. He loves to run in the house, @ 2 its all he can do to keep up with the big ppls. The minute you tell him NOT to run and sit his you know what in a chair? Instant tears.
Part of parenting is learning your kids not just teaching them.
[+]
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2821
By Odin.Sheelay 2011-06-20 00:24:58
zahrah said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
So, if someone were to break into my house, to rob the place, and then rape me that's acceptable?
Let's not be concerned with the fact that I could have prevented it by defending myself. If you're going to suggest hand-to-hand. I'm 5'7" and 116 pounds.
The nuts. Never forget to kick the nuts. Neither height nor weight matter.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2011-06-20 00:25:05
zahrah said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
So, if someone were to break into my house, to rob the place, and then rape me that's acceptable?
Let's not be concerned with the fact that I could have prevented it by defending myself. If you're going to suggest hand-to-hand. I'm 5'7" and 116 pounds. Omitting the raping part, there have actually been cases where people who have broken into a house and hurt themselves inside your house have sued the homeowner. No joke.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:25:13
zahrah said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
So, if someone were to break into my house, to rob the place, and then rape me that's acceptable?
Let's not be concerned with the fact that I could have prevented it by defending myself. If you're going to suggest hand-to-hand. I'm 5'7" and 116 pounds.
On your property =/= breaking into your house.
On your property =/= chasing after you.
Your stuff though, you do not have the right to take life to protect your things. Just you or others.
Their life isn't less important than your sense of security.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:31:14
Bahamut.Bizarro said: Our 1st child was born and my wife SWORE she would never spank her. When the occasion warranted it I had no problem with a swift 1 or 2 quick swats to the rear.
At about the age of 3 my family was out somewhere and I had wandered off to within earshot but out of visual range. I heard my wife give the "do you want a time out?" speech about 3 times, time outs were the punishment of choice for Mrs. Bizzy, and yet my daughter continued to misbehave. As I rounded the corner I simply said if she didn't behave I would spank her. INSTANT attitude reversal and manner change.
Baffled my wife asked me, "Why does she always listen to you and never me? I don't understand." etc etc. My immediate answer was that I had spanked her before, she knew I would do it, and didn't want it again. ~2 weeks later after a few very gentle spankings later my wife got the same instant behavior change too. Did she change her mind? Hell yes she did.
Call it fear, call it abuse, call it whatever you want. Even 1 generation ago children/teens taking knives or other weapons to school NEVER happened. Kids pulling half the stunts they pull now NEVER happened. They would simply not do it cause they KNEW they would be in a world of **it when Dad found out about it. Now go back further to 2 or 3 generations and the change in child behavior is even more drastic.
Now our son, he gives a rats tail if u spank him. For him, the time outs work better. Recent events form a perfect example. He loves to run in the house, @ 2 its all he can do to keep up with the big ppls. The minute you tell him NOT to run and sit his you know what in a chair? Instant tears.
Part of parenting is learning your kids not just teaching them.
It's still abuse and assault.
I can't wait for the day you and your kind and your backwards way of thinking is gone from this world.
As for children/teens not taking knives to school, man you're delusional.
[+]
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2011-06-20 00:34:33
Odin.Liela said: I believe only when it's necessary.
For one, it doesn't hurt. It's more the embarrassment and the fear of pain than anything. Case in point, I once watched my uncle turn my cousin over his knee, place one hand over her butt, then spank his hand-- not touching her in the least, but acting as though he was spanking her, accompanied by the noise of getting hit. She bawled her eyes out, although she hadn't even been hit.
It's the same with dogs. You can roll up a newspaper and smack a puppy across the butt with it, and they know right away that they are in trouble. Later, you can roll up a newspaper and smack your hand with it, and you'll likely get the same reaction from the dog without having to even pretend to hit them.
Also, in comparisons to other types of punishments, it really seems rather tame. Since my parents were divorced, I was able to have experience getting two different types of discipline. My father and stepmother would never spank. Instead, they'd give me a guilt trip-- essentially, they'd sit me down and tell me how disappointed they were in me and how I was an embarrassment to them. After a childhood of guilt trips, it took literally years after not living with them anymore to teach myself to stop apologizing after everything I did or said, whether it needed an apology or not. Also, now if I know they won't agree with something, I simply don't tell them. They do not know that I am no longer religious, and they'll never know. They do not know that I think gays should be allowed to marry and have equal rights, and they'll never know. There's a lot of things that they will simply never know, because I have no intention of dealing with the massive guilt trip that would follow.
However, my mother and stepfather spanked me when I needed it. And five minutes later when my butt stopped stinging, I was fine. There were no years of negative aftermath from it, and I'm much closer to my mom today than I am to my stepmother, although my stepmother is the one who raised me. My mom is the one who knows I have tattoos and drink whiskey and like jello shots and wear my shorts a little too short sometimes. She's the one who still has a significant role in my life. And I believe it's because I'm not afraid of what her reaction would be if she disapproved of something I did. I know she'd love me anyways, whether my choice would have been her choice or not. I don't have that guarantee of love from my stepmother. I'd simply be told what an awful disappointment I am to her.
However, I do think it should be only on an as-necessary basis. If you can get by with just telling your kid no, or grounding them, or something mild like that, then by all means do that first. It's only when they absolutely need spanked that they should get spanked. Psychological discipline is far more detrimental to a child than a swift kick to the butt (or spanking).
[+]
Ifrit.Herc
Server: Ifrit
Game: FFXI
Posts: 138
By Ifrit.Herc 2011-06-20 00:34:38
I dont plan on spanking my kids, but i come from a Greek family, with some crazy Euro parents, if i was bad i got my *** beat, smack on butt, soap for cursing....***my mom had a wooden spoon and hit my hand or ***...she had an extra one in the car too incase we mouthed off there too...man my dad almodt threw me through a wall, but lookin back at it..i deserved it and it made me strong and respectful, so to answer OP....if my kid some real dumb ***...imma whoop his *** to get the message across that what he/she is doing is unacceptable.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2011-06-20 00:37:00
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Bahamut.Bizarro said: Our 1st child was born and my wife SWORE she would never spank her. When the occasion warranted it I had no problem with a swift 1 or 2 quick swats to the rear.
At about the age of 3 my family was out somewhere and I had wandered off to within earshot but out of visual range. I heard my wife give the "do you want a time out?" speech about 3 times, time outs were the punishment of choice for Mrs. Bizzy, and yet my daughter continued to misbehave. As I rounded the corner I simply said if she didn't behave I would spank her. INSTANT attitude reversal and manner change.
Baffled my wife asked me, "Why does she always listen to you and never me? I don't understand." etc etc. My immediate answer was that I had spanked her before, she knew I would do it, and didn't want it again. ~2 weeks later after a few very gentle spankings later my wife got the same instant behavior change too. Did she change her mind? Hell yes she did.
Call it fear, call it abuse, call it whatever you want. Even 1 generation ago children/teens taking knives or other weapons to school NEVER happened. Kids pulling half the stunts they pull now NEVER happened. They would simply not do it cause they KNEW they would be in a world of **it when Dad found out about it. Now go back further to 2 or 3 generations and the change in child behavior is even more drastic.
Now our son, he gives a rats tail if u spank him. For him, the time outs work better. Recent events form a perfect example. He loves to run in the house, @ 2 its all he can do to keep up with the big ppls. The minute you tell him NOT to run and sit his you know what in a chair? Instant tears.
Part of parenting is learning your kids not just teaching them.
It's still abuse and assault.
I can't wait for the day you and your kind and your backwards way of thinking is gone from this world.
As for children/teens not taking knives to school, man you're delusional. He's talking about teens from like the 1970's and earlier versus today's youth.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:38:25
Leviathan.Chaosx said: Odin.Liela said: I believe only when it's necessary.
For one, it doesn't hurt. It's more the embarrassment and the fear of pain than anything. Case in point, I once watched my uncle turn my cousin over his knee, place one hand over her butt, then spank his hand-- not touching her in the least, but acting as though he was spanking her, accompanied by the noise of getting hit. She bawled her eyes out, although she hadn't even been hit.
It's the same with dogs. You can roll up a newspaper and smack a puppy across the butt with it, and they know right away that they are in trouble. Later, you can roll up a newspaper and smack your hand with it, and you'll likely get the same reaction from the dog without having to even pretend to hit them.
Also, in comparisons to other types of punishments, it really seems rather tame. Since my parents were divorced, I was able to have experience getting two different types of discipline. My father and stepmother would never spank. Instead, they'd give me a guilt trip-- essentially, they'd sit me down and tell me how disappointed they were in me and how I was an embarrassment to them. After a childhood of guilt trips, it took literally years after not living with them anymore to teach myself to stop apologizing after everything I did or said, whether it needed an apology or not. Also, now if I know they won't agree with something, I simply don't tell them. They do not know that I am no longer religious, and they'll never know. They do not know that I think gays should be allowed to marry and have equal rights, and they'll never know. There's a lot of things that they will simply never know, because I have no intention of dealing with the massive guilt trip that would follow.
However, my mother and stepfather spanked me when I needed it. And five minutes later when my butt stopped stinging, I was fine. There were no years of negative aftermath from it, and I'm much closer to my mom today than I am to my stepmother, although my stepmother is the one who raised me. My mom is the one who knows I have tattoos and drink whiskey and like jello shots and wear my shorts a little too short sometimes. She's the one who still has a significant role in my life. And I believe it's because I'm not afraid of what her reaction would be if she disapproved of something I did. I know she'd love me anyways, whether my choice would have been her choice or not. I don't have that guarantee of love from my stepmother. I'd simply be told what an awful disappointment I am to her.
However, I do think it should be only on an as-necessary basis. If you can get by with just telling your kid no, or grounding them, or something mild like that, then by all means do that first. It's only when they absolutely need spanked that they should get spanked. Psychological discipline can be far more detrimental to a child than a swift kick to the butt (or spanking).
ftfy
[+]
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:39:45
Leviathan.Chaosx said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Bahamut.Bizarro said: Our 1st child was born and my wife SWORE she would never spank her. When the occasion warranted it I had no problem with a swift 1 or 2 quick swats to the rear.
At about the age of 3 my family was out somewhere and I had wandered off to within earshot but out of visual range. I heard my wife give the "do you want a time out?" speech about 3 times, time outs were the punishment of choice for Mrs. Bizzy, and yet my daughter continued to misbehave. As I rounded the corner I simply said if she didn't behave I would spank her. INSTANT attitude reversal and manner change.
Baffled my wife asked me, "Why does she always listen to you and never me? I don't understand." etc etc. My immediate answer was that I had spanked her before, she knew I would do it, and didn't want it again. ~2 weeks later after a few very gentle spankings later my wife got the same instant behavior change too. Did she change her mind? Hell yes she did.
Call it fear, call it abuse, call it whatever you want. Even 1 generation ago children/teens taking knives or other weapons to school NEVER happened. Kids pulling half the stunts they pull now NEVER happened. They would simply not do it cause they KNEW they would be in a world of **it when Dad found out about it. Now go back further to 2 or 3 generations and the change in child behavior is even more drastic.
Now our son, he gives a rats tail if u spank him. For him, the time outs work better. Recent events form a perfect example. He loves to run in the house, @ 2 its all he can do to keep up with the big ppls. The minute you tell him NOT to run and sit his you know what in a chair? Instant tears.
Part of parenting is learning your kids not just teaching them.
It's still abuse and assault.
I can't wait for the day you and your kind and your backwards way of thinking is gone from this world.
As for children/teens not taking knives to school, man you're delusional. He's talking about teens from like the 1970's and earlier versus today's youth.
Again, delusional.
Then again until the newer anti-gang anti-school violence age it was okay to bring them to school...
[+]
Bahamut.Bizarro
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 231
By Bahamut.Bizarro 2011-06-20 00:46:52
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Bahamut.Bizarro said: Our 1st child was born and my wife SWORE she would never spank her. When the occasion warranted it I had no problem with a swift 1 or 2 quick swats to the rear.
At about the age of 3 my family was out somewhere and I had wandered off to within earshot but out of visual range. I heard my wife give the "do you want a time out?" speech about 3 times, time outs were the punishment of choice for Mrs. Bizzy, and yet my daughter continued to misbehave. As I rounded the corner I simply said if she didn't behave I would spank her. INSTANT attitude reversal and manner change.
Baffled my wife asked me, "Why does she always listen to you and never me? I don't understand." etc etc. My immediate answer was that I had spanked her before, she knew I would do it, and didn't want it again. ~2 weeks later after a few very gentle spankings later my wife got the same instant behavior change too. Did she change her mind? Hell yes she did.
Call it fear, call it abuse, call it whatever you want. Even 1 generation ago children/teens taking knives or other weapons to school NEVER happened. Kids pulling half the stunts they pull now NEVER happened. They would simply not do it cause they KNEW they would be in a world of **it when Dad found out about it. Now go back further to 2 or 3 generations and the change in child behavior is even more drastic.
Now our son, he gives a rats tail if u spank him. For him, the time outs work better. Recent events form a perfect example. He loves to run in the house, @ 2 its all he can do to keep up with the big ppls. The minute you tell him NOT to run and sit his you know what in a chair? Instant tears.
Part of parenting is learning your kids not just teaching them.
It's still abuse and assault.
I can't wait for the day you and your kind and your backwards way of thinking is gone from this world.
As for children/teens not taking knives to school, man you're delusional.
Really? You lived then? (Not saying I did) Even my generation had LESS school violence. Not talking about bullying here, I'm referring to kids getting stabbed/shot cause they dress a certain way or said something that someone else took offense to.
Again you seem to assume that a couple swats that BARELY (in my case) turn the skin red equate to abuse. I have to side with those that said your opinions may change when you have kids of your own. Cause if not I pity the people that are forced to see and hear your kids run rampant in a public place while you sit there oh so patiently calmly saying "You can't do that little Johnny you have to behave or I'm gonna take away your Gameboy."
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2821
By Odin.Sheelay 2011-06-20 00:49:03
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Leviathan.Chaosx said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Bahamut.Bizarro said: Our 1st child was born and my wife SWORE she would never spank her. When the occasion warranted it I had no problem with a swift 1 or 2 quick swats to the rear.
At about the age of 3 my family was out somewhere and I had wandered off to within earshot but out of visual range. I heard my wife give the "do you want a time out?" speech about 3 times, time outs were the punishment of choice for Mrs. Bizzy, and yet my daughter continued to misbehave. As I rounded the corner I simply said if she didn't behave I would spank her. INSTANT attitude reversal and manner change.
Baffled my wife asked me, "Why does she always listen to you and never me? I don't understand." etc etc. My immediate answer was that I had spanked her before, she knew I would do it, and didn't want it again. ~2 weeks later after a few very gentle spankings later my wife got the same instant behavior change too. Did she change her mind? Hell yes she did.
Call it fear, call it abuse, call it whatever you want. Even 1 generation ago children/teens taking knives or other weapons to school NEVER happened. Kids pulling half the stunts they pull now NEVER happened. They would simply not do it cause they KNEW they would be in a world of **it when Dad found out about it. Now go back further to 2 or 3 generations and the change in child behavior is even more drastic.
Now our son, he gives a rats tail if u spank him. For him, the time outs work better. Recent events form a perfect example. He loves to run in the house, @ 2 its all he can do to keep up with the big ppls. The minute you tell him NOT to run and sit his you know what in a chair? Instant tears.
Part of parenting is learning your kids not just teaching them.
It's still abuse and assault.
I can't wait for the day you and your kind and your backwards way of thinking is gone from this world.
As for children/teens not taking knives to school, man you're delusional. He's talking about teens from like the 1970's and earlier versus today's youth.
Again, delusional.
Then again until the newer anti-gang anti-school violence age it was okay to bring them to school...
By your teaching, your kids will likely be the ones bringing shotguns to school, simply because there will have been no one yelling at them "What the hell do you think you are doing".
But, oh wait, even yelling is probably abuse, to your opinion at least.
The fact you are wishing for those who are contrary to your opinion to vanish from the face of the earth should tell enough of how "civil" and respectful you really are though.
[+]
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2011-06-20 00:49:56
I feel like we've done this dance before.
[+]
Bahamut.Bizarro
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 231
By Bahamut.Bizarro 2011-06-20 00:53:40
Leviathan.Chaosx said: I feel like we've done this dance before. LOL ya Ive had a similar discussion with a, at the time, new father. his son just turned 1 year old yesterday. I need to ask him if hes tapped a hand or something when his son picked up something he shouldn't have.
Cerberus.Zandra
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 736
By Cerberus.Zandra 2011-06-20 00:54:22
Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
You can think its unacceptable all you want, but according to common law its quite acceptable. How long should you wait to find out someone is out to kill you? Can you only shoot them after you get stabbed/shot?
EDIT: being on your property without your permission is enough to classify them as an immediate threat.
Depends on the area, and at least in Virginia we're not backwards enough to not require that they must pose an immediate threat.
as for your edit, no it isn't.
Yes it is, you are wrong
Asura.Shylaa
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Shylaa 2011-06-20 00:58:10
Bahamut.Bizarro said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Bahamut.Bizarro said: Our 1st child was born and my wife SWORE she would never spank her. When the occasion warranted it I had no problem with a swift 1 or 2 quick swats to the rear.
At about the age of 3 my family was out somewhere and I had wandered off to within earshot but out of visual range. I heard my wife give the "do you want a time out?" speech about 3 times, time outs were the punishment of choice for Mrs. Bizzy, and yet my daughter continued to misbehave. As I rounded the corner I simply said if she didn't behave I would spank her. INSTANT attitude reversal and manner change.
Baffled my wife asked me, "Why does she always listen to you and never me? I don't understand." etc etc. My immediate answer was that I had spanked her before, she knew I would do it, and didn't want it again. ~2 weeks later after a few very gentle spankings later my wife got the same instant behavior change too. Did she change her mind? Hell yes she did.
Call it fear, call it abuse, call it whatever you want. Even 1 generation ago children/teens taking knives or other weapons to school NEVER happened. Kids pulling half the stunts they pull now NEVER happened. They would simply not do it cause they KNEW they would be in a world of **it when Dad found out about it. Now go back further to 2 or 3 generations and the change in child behavior is even more drastic.
Now our son, he gives a rats tail if u spank him. For him, the time outs work better. Recent events form a perfect example. He loves to run in the house, @ 2 its all he can do to keep up with the big ppls. The minute you tell him NOT to run and sit his you know what in a chair? Instant tears.
Part of parenting is learning your kids not just teaching them.
Totally agree with this. I was spanked often enough as a brat teen, with wooden spoons, leather belts with metal studs, whatever was at hand. I now respect people and have a very calm demeanor. I'd hate to see how I would have turned out if I was not taught discipline. Most likely like my GF's sisters.
They continually backtalk to their parents face, never listen, tell them to shutup when they are told to do something, lie about where they are going and what they are doing, have sexual conversations with online men (These girsl are 19, 16 and 12) and thats just what I know about. Do they get any discipline whatsoever? No. Should they? In my opinion a very big YES! Anyone from my generation (I'm 29 so 80's kid's know what I'm talking about hopefully) would have been popped in the mouth for directly defying and back talking their parents to their face, and would have deserved it.
I wish these kids nowadays would get disciplined. I can't even count the number of times I go out and kids are running around doing whatever they want and the parents just sit idly by doing nothing. Though to me it seems at times they are most likely just afraid of getting some stupid jackass calling "abuse" on their children. I say to those f**ktards, how about you try raising the kids then if you will do such a better job. No discipline and learning that there is no consequence for your actions is what's turned this country into the sh*thead capitol of the world it has become.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 00:59:34
Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Cerberus.Zandra said: Bahamut.Jetackuu said: Valefor.Slipispsycho said: If assault was assault it wouldn't be legal to shoot someone in Texas when they're on your property and you tell them to leave and they refuse.. That's not civil, and it's still assault, justified or not. Your logic is flawed.
More like Texas is flawed.
Shooting somebody for not leaving your property is assault, murder (or attempted) nor is it civil.
Unfortunately Texas is *** backwards.
Unless some sort of self defense, which isn't assault.
Trespassing is an acceptable justification to trigger the lethal use of force in the name of self defense.
Only for ignorant rednecks, not for civilized persons.
Unless they are posing an immediate threat, ie: toting a knife or gun, it's not acceptable.
You can think its unacceptable all you want, but according to common law its quite acceptable. How long should you wait to find out someone is out to kill you? Can you only shoot them after you get stabbed/shot?
EDIT: being on your property without your permission is enough to classify them as an immediate threat.
Depends on the area, and at least in Virginia we're not backwards enough to not require that they must pose an immediate threat.
as for your edit, no it isn't.
Yes it is, you are wrong
The quick google search I just did on castle law says otherwise, get your head out of your tea party *** and smell reality
[+]
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 389
By Sylph.Maruraba 2011-06-20 01:04:28
Not sure what the last 4 pages have said, not going to read every reply, but I'll give my answer, TW.
I have no idea.
I don't have kids, but my sister had a baby recently and it has got me thinking about child-rearing lately. ("REARing." Shoulda made a pun there.) I was spanked as a kid, and while I'm not really one to cry "abuse!" the fact is that I think my dad did it a little too much, and made it a bit too personal, like "It's not because you're bad, it's because you pissed me off." But I'm an adult, and I've talked to him about it, and we're cool with it now.
Is it always abuse? I guess I can't answer that either. Maybe it really is situational. I'm not the sort of guy to claim that violence never solves any problems, because we all know that sometimes it does. Maybe pain and using it to modify a kid's behavior really is better than having them turn out rotten. B.F. Skinner didn't give a ***if you knew the difference between right and wrong so long as you acted like you did, and on a day-to-day basis, I don't care either. But then again, it's a crime to hit another adult, and a kid is totally defenseless and dependent on you and trusts you implicitly... and legally, it's okay to hit them, even if it's just on their backsides.
But if it was my kid... I'd have a hard time with that decision. That's a potentially dark road to go down, and I don't know if I could do it, personally.
Bahamut.Jetackuu
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9001
By Bahamut.Jetackuu 2011-06-20 01:05:55
Odin.Sheelay said:
By your teaching, your kids will likely be the ones bringing shotguns to school, simply because there will have been no one yelling at them "What the hell do you think you are doing".
But, oh wait, even yelling is probably abuse, to your opinion at least.
The fact you are wishing for those who are contrary to your opinion to vanish from the face of the earth should tell enough of how "civil" and respectful you really are though.
I don't plan to send any child I spawn to public school, more than likely they will be tutored.
As for wishing for ignorant people who abuse their children to vanish from the face of the earth, there's nothing uncivil about that.
So, was having this debate on whether spanking is still an applicable technique or not in these times on facebook and wanted to drop in and see what XI thought on the matter.
Always
Sometimes
Only when you really feel its necessary
Never
Or anything in between.
|
|