|
 |
By Johnb on 2026-02-24 14:52:38
|
Better in that they cost 10 less chocobucks but otherwise identical in stats bonus of +5.
It seems that option for "raise attributes" is only for raised chocobos in the the stables still and not retired one like mine, so nevermind.
|
|
 |
By . on 2026-02-24 14:46:04
|
Ridiculous, I need to try mercari or somewhere. Over 100 dollars in fees. I lost 80 dollars on something that was brand new unopened and the only way it sold in over 3 months was to promote it. Crazy
|
|
 |
By Lili on 2026-02-24 14:40:12
|
Bahamut.Daleterrence said: »1) I'll make sure your addons are not included going forward, and include a form for those who also do not want their addons included. If I can build the site into something people are happy to use, in time I will include a way for authors to opt out of being included on their repos, but that feels very presumptuous of me to do right now.
2) I will sort that so instead of linking to the Lua directly, it goes to the repo. Unsure why I didn't do it that way in the first place honestly, likely just inexperience on my part.
3) Licenses is a good point, and again, my fault for lack of experience, I will fix this up. Thank you.
4) This will likely be fixed with the move to linking to repos, instead of linking to addons directly, but I will make sure I do a pass to filter out libraries.
2, 3, and 4 do address my personal concerns entirely, if you implement those I won't feel like my stuff needs to be off it. Still I think an opt-out would be nice to offer regardless, as others might feel stronger about it.
|
|
 |
By Jakey on 2026-02-24 14:35:29
|
|
I mean the easiest way to improve trusts would be to just switch a bunch of the useless dd trusts to supports and give them simpler rules and no ws, like one just always uses march one does minuets, one does sam and cor roll etc. Let us just pick the buffs we want instead of trying to have some logic that messes everything up.
|
|
 |
|
|
I'm just explaining that shortcuts have to be taken and shortcuts will miss things, general problem scope stuff.
I've used the simulator to just check for optimal setups but its non-deterministic so you almost need to monte carlo it. Although if you have to squint to figure out which is better the actual answer is it probably doesn't matter because of the game RNG and just other things happening anyways.
|
|
 |
|
|
yeah but it's not the first time I'm using, been using it for a long time and I never found these behaviours before ^^'
In the examples above the choice of items was extremely limited btw, everything was locked except Cape (4 options), multiple options for waist and lotsa options for Ear1 and Ear2.
|
|
 |
|
(one of the many reason I never summon August is because he has 100% accuracy), because Qultada or whoever will always Burning Blade for 2692 right in the middle of your 3-step.
August's *** up the skillchain skill rises .1
|
|
 |
|
|
We already know how a "stat up" boost will work as it is similar to Moogle Mastery. Anyone with a decently leveled Moogle Mastery will tell you that it certainly helps with survivability, but the Trust's usefulness does not increase in any meaningful way.
AAEV will stop getting absolutely clapped in two hits by Gaol bosses, but she doesn't have any meaningful upgrades in terms of damage output, cure strength or enmity generation. Mastery is simply making them die less...which is a start but it isn't going to move the needle for most people.
As far as Limbus goes, I have no idea why they limit to three Trusts, it just makes the solo runs excruciatingly slow (yes, I'm certain they are trying to "push" you do group up, but we know that many people will simply not do this). Even with five powered up Trusts you won't be doing this content nearly as fast or safely as a real party or alliance so I do not understand the restriction at all there.
|
|
 |
|
|
I don't know the specifics of the algorithm (and for the purposes of this post I'm not going to read it), but I can state definitively with this stuff when building something 'optimal' the number of possibilities is the amount of gear choices available for each slot times the number of choices for each other slot.
Suppose you have: heads, hands, feet
2 head pieces (A, B)
3 hand pieces (C, D, E)
4 feet pieces (F, G, H, I)
That's 2x3x4 choices: 24
A C F
A C G
A C H
...
B E H
B E I
So with 16 slots lets just pick 16 choices each (most are probably more than this) so 16^16:
That's 18.4x10^18 choices. At 1 microsecond to analyze them each it would take 584 thousand years to check them all. (not happening)
As such there's shortcuts taken. A common one is change 1 or 2 pieces of gear at a time and check the set, but this can change the answer depending on what you start with (ie different stats will help more depending on what you might have too much or not enough of in your starter set)
Coupled with I believe it allows parameters (keep -DT maxed) that could prevent certain choices.
Also I presume its solving for a single stat (not sure which and if its overall dmg not sure if its using the random or just take an avg. between min/max pDiF)
My recommendation is to use it for a starting point and use your intuition to tweak and check stuff, don't ask for magic.
|
|
 |
By NynJa on 2026-02-24 13:32:55
|
|
Hot take: Gatekeeping is good
|
|
 |
By enoch on 2026-02-24 13:05:22
|
|
Let's thought experiment the other extreme. What if it's stats +500? Ok, they can survive and have enough accuracy to hit things. Their decision tree and abilities are still gonna suck. What else? What are the other unintended consequences of SE over-correcting?
|
|
 |
|
|
In my case I can say that when I removed Null Cape from the options, then it "rightfully" picked the Dex/DW cape option + Suppa + Reiki + Eabani (capped DW with /DNC, just what I would expect or something close to that).
If I put Null Cape back in the options, then it picks Null + Sailfi+1 R15 + Brutal + Cessance.
I mean... maybe that REALLY is the best option I dunno, but it sounds very very fishy to me, I think there's something off in the "attack Delay" calculations. The simulator reaches the 80% delay reduction earlier than it should, as a consequence it rightfully thinks adding more DW would do nothing and simply reduce tp/hit.
It makes sense, doesn't it?
Thing is... you're not at the 80% delay reduction when the simulator thinks you are, and this throws the results off.
JM2C, I'm dumb when it comes to math. We need someone proficient like Thorny, Simon or Byrth! XD
|
|
 |
|
|
It found something I really didn't want people to find (I deleted it), not against the project in principle but its likely going to put more eyeballs on some authors stuff than they'd like. (people who back stuff up for personal use, were not the original author, have half baked/experiment/under development branches, don't want to support randos using their code etc...)
If people care about keeping their code private I'd recommend bitbucket over github anyways. (not an expert here, but when I wanted to back up sensitive code (not ffxi related) the terms of use seemed much more palatable several years ago (i set stuff up and roll with it until I feel there's good reason not to), someone more in the know may have a better recommendation).
|
|
 |
|
|
unless it does more than increase HP/MP it's kinda meh... don't get me wrong, more HP/MP on them is nice, and can certainly carry you farther if you're soloing, but what they really need is a system to modify their AI. Even if it's just nominally.
|
|
 |
|
|
The next version update is scheduled for early March.
With this version update, we are shifting the Trust magic system from a party-support role to one focused on expanding solo play. Going forward, we will continue refining its core mechanics as part of a broader overhaul of the overall system.
As a first step toward this goal, the March version update will implement a new system known as alter ego points that can be used to upgrade the stats of your alter egos.
----
This sounds good, no? As a non-multiboxxer, this month has felt extra quiet for... well, everything.
|
|
 |
|
|
just pumping these in while im tinkering around in a work meeting
==============================================================
main Naegling
sub Gleti's Knife R15
ranged Ataktos
ammo Devastating Bullet
head Malignance Chapeau
neck Null Loop
ear1 Suppanomimi
ear2 Dedition Earring
body Adhemar Jacket +1 B
hands Malignance Gloves
ring1 Epona's Ring
ring2 Defending Ring
back Camulus's Mantle DEX DA
waist Sailfi Belt +1 R15
legs Chasseur's Culottes +2
feet Malignance Boots
Avg WS Time = 4.564 s
Avg TP per round = 321.3 TP
==============================================================
I Removed the adhemar bodies ( A and B)
==============================================================
main Naegling
sub Gleti's Knife R15
ranged Ataktos
ammo Devastating Bullet
head Malignance Chapeau
neck Iskur Gorget
ear1 Dedition Earring
ear2 Brutal Earring
body Malignance Tabard
hands Adhemar Wristbands +1 A
ring1 Epona's Ring
ring2 Defending Ring
back Camulus's Mantle DEX Dual Wield
waist Sailfi Belt +1 R15
legs Chasseur's Culottes +2
feet Malignance Boots
Avg WS Time = 4.462 s
Avg TP per round = 333.8 TP
==============================================================
again minor improvement from removing choices.
|
|
 |
|
|
once again a case of sub optimal findings
First sets:
==============================================================
main Naegling
sub Gleti's Knife R15
ranged Ataktos
ammo Devastating Bullet
head Malignance Chapeau
neck Combatant's Torque
ear1 Cessance Earring
ear2 Dedition Earring
body Malignance Tabard
hands Adhemar Wristbands +1 C
ring1 Epona's Ring
ring2 Defending Ring
back Camulus's Mantle DEX Dual Wield
waist Sailfi Belt +1 R15
legs Chasseur's Culottes +2
feet Malignance Boots
Avg WS Time = 4.554 s
Avg TP per round = 327.1 TP
==============================================================
THen i removed the Dedition Earring as a choice
==============================================================
main Naegling
sub Gleti's Knife R15
ranged Ataktos
ammo Devastating Bullet
head Malignance Chapeau
neck Null Loop
ear1 Cessance Earring
ear2 Brutal Earring
body Malignance Tabard
hands Adhemar Wristbands +1 B
ring1 Epona's Ring
ring2 Defending Ring
back Camulus's Mantle DEX Dual Wield
waist Sailfi Belt +1 R15
legs Chasseur's Culottes +2
feet Carmine Greaves +1 R15B
Avg WS Time = 4.542 s
Avg TP per round = 328.0 TP
==============================================================
Again the difference is minor but it worry meat that i cant trust the findings .or is there some other goal its trying to archive that is unknown/not displayed?
both this and prior post was done with -50 PDT and MDT
|
|
 |
|
|
Found another case of sub optimal findings
==============================================================
main Naegling
sub Gleti's Knife R15
ranged Ataktos
ammo Devastating Bullet
head Malignance Chapeau
neck Null Loop
ear1 Eabani Earring
ear2 Dedition Earring
body Malignance Tabard
hands Adhemar Wristbands +1 A
ring1 Epona's Ring
ring2 Defending Ring
back Camulus's Mantle DEX DA
waist Reiki Yotai
legs Malignance Tights
feet Malignance Boots
Avg WS Time = 8.791 s
Avg TP per round = 317.0 TP
==============================================================
I removed Reiki Yotai as an option under waist and got something better
==============================================================
main Naegling
sub Gleti's Knife R15
ranged Ataktos
ammo Devastating Bullet
head Malignance Chapeau
neck Null Loop
ear1 Cessance Earring
ear2 Dedition Earring
body Malignance Tabard
hands Adhemar Wristbands +1 B
ring1 Epona's Ring
ring2 Defending Ring
back Camulus's Mantle DEX Dual Wield
waist Sailfi Belt +1 R15
legs Meghanada Chausses +2
feet Malignance Boots
Avg WS Time = 8.676 s
Avg TP per round = 326.2 TP
==============================================================
it a small difference but it seems to happen regulary that something seems off to me and when i remove options then it will find a more optimal set even thoug that set combo was always available
|
|
 |
By Garuda. Chanti on 2026-02-24 11:20:43
|
Actually one of the worst ones I remember was in 1996, it was a huge blizzard. I was a little kid living in Staten Island and I remember the snow was taller than me lol. It didn't get as bad as then but its weird to have all this in FEB. Worst I remember was somewhere in the 1960s and had no snow. It was 5f, -15c, with a FIERCE wind roaring through the steel canyons. My car's battery froze and cracked. No idea of the humidity but it obviously enough to help the cold penetrate.
I have been more comfortable at -20f. I had never heard of a car battery freezing before. My electrolyte had to have been weak.
|
|
 |
By Seun on 2026-02-24 09:24:52
|
1) Ditch the whole massive list that is auto generated and instead hand tailor lists from safe to more risky.
Agreed with everything else, but... The punishment for using third party software doesn't vary by addon, so the warning should be universal as well. Players have been and will continue to be banned because they thought they were using acceptable addons. This is almost giving them a reason to point a finger at you when that inevitably happens.
|
|
 |
By . on 2026-02-24 09:21:05
|
Talking about the winter games, thia time, for the first time in hiatory a brazilian (and maybe the first latin american too) earned a gold medal.
When he earned the medal, we had some news of winter games at front page here for a couple of days, before all the news related to itnsimply vanishing from the site
That was fun for a little while until you dug a little deeper and discovered he was Norwegian. His mom was born in Brazil or something and he didn't want to compete for a spot with his stacked Norwegian team. Of course Brazil took him.
|
|
 |
|
|
Potentially yeah, not sure how to weigh 100% chance with ele obi vs the occasional(30% chance?) 15% boost
|
|
 |
|
One reason I don't want my stuff to be in this collection, but not the only reason, is that the links are not to the repo but directly to each individual lua file.
I need users to be able to see, for example, the main repo-related readme rather than the per-addon ones, but also the links to my discord, the links to my patreon (I don't have one, saying in general), etc, otherwise we have a Google Search Snippets issue. Furthermore, you are not linking to repo licenses, which depending on the license might not be allowed.
Websites are also publicly available on the entire internet, yet we have robots.txt and scraper exclusion for a reason.
(also you're listing a million library files that are useless on their own, but this is a minor detail)
Those are some fair points, and valid criticism. I appreciate that, thank you.
1) I'll make sure your addons are not included going forward, and include a form for those who also do not want their addons included. If I can build the site into something people are happy to use, in time I will include a way for authors to opt out of being included on their repos, but that feels very presumptuous of me to do right now.
2) I will sort that so instead of linking to the Lua directly, it goes to the repo. Unsure why I didn't do it that way in the first place honestly, likely just inexperience on my part.
3) Licenses is a good point, and again, my fault for lack of experience, I will fix this up. Thank you.
4) This will likely be fixed with the move to linking to repos, instead of linking to addons directly, but I will make sure I do a pass to filter out libraries.
On the whole, thank you for the measured feedback, I appreciate all of it considering your experience.
You know as well as I do that those warnings mean nothing and OP will get the blame regardless how many warnings there are.
You generate a list, you make yourself responsible for what's on the list.
Someone searching the Internet on their own and downloading something can only be on them.
There are always going to be people that are going to do something stupid, regardless of warnings, and suffer consequences. I do not feel that alone is worth preventing to try to do something that might help the majority.
On the other hand, most of them are just shovelware. It'd be more useful to have a curated list of ~50 worthwhile addons written by hand with information on them than an auto generated list of 700 links to trash. It's a little easier to sift through than other search methods, but it's still mostly junk.
I like the idea of a curated list, maybe that could eventually be the main tab of the website with "All" being an alternative. Thank you for the feedback.
The idea of a centralized site sounds great but this is kinda throwing out AI slop vibes to me at least.
I was actually very very scared to share this site publicly and it took some convincing from friends to get me to do so, because I was worried it was just going to be labelled "AI slop".
I know you don't me, and I don't know you, but I can promise you I am very strongly anti-AI. I've spent the last year or so teaching myself python, as I already knew a fair amount of HTML, and Lua from my previous career. I've driven my poor friends completely insane with questions about how to do this, or that, etc. I understand why you would make that assumption in today's world, but at the same time, I'm a little hurt that my work isn't good enough yet to stand out from AI, yet. I can only improve. As for your feedback...
Here is some constructive criticism.
1) Ditch the whole massive list that is auto generated and instead hand tailor lists from safe to more risky.
2) Dont link directly to the lua file but to the owners repo itself.
3) Windowers official repo doesnt even really need to be listed here since all addons are in the launcher. Can make a note to check the launcher for official addons
4) If repos have a mix of safe and risky addons have a note that some addons from the repo could be risky.
5) If a repo author doesnt want to be in your list be respectful and remove them(or dont but then makes you seem shady and untrustworthy)
1) I won't be doing this, right now, at least. Maybe in the future when I can curate a list of solid addons.
2) See my reply to Lili above.
3) Fair point, I'll change that.
4) I can do this as I manually review repos after making changes.
5) See my reply to Lili above.
Thank you for your feedback.
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
This is horrible! I demand reparations! Rainbow mog pells, please! :)
|
|
 |
By waffle on 2026-02-24 08:30:04
|
|
Sylph booted me 3x in a row in a besieged around an hour or so ago. Enough to make sure I got no credit.
|
|
 |
|
|
It isn't just Asura. It's happening on all servers and there's issues connecting throgh PoL.
Seeing as my JP friends and a few NAs are not having issues, there's probably a faulty node somewhere.
|
|
 |
|
|
im still on too. But we did had allot of weird stuff in khamir about 4hrs ago. Saw people going red and dc. Even during a sortie run people had hard times staying logged on.
|
|
 |
By Eiryl on 2026-02-24 07:58:23
|
|
Only down for you
I got this error once last night, 10 seconds later it was fine
|
|
 |
By zeta on 2026-02-24 07:53:18
|
|
The idea of a centralized site sounds great but this is kinda throwing out AI slop vibes to me at least.
Here is some constructive criticism.
1) Ditch the whole massive list that is auto generated and instead hand tailor lists from safe to more risky.
2) Dont link directly to the lua file but to the owners repo itself.
3) Windowers official repo doesnt even really need to be listed here since all addons are in the launcher. Can make a note to check the launcher for official addons
4) If repos have a mix of safe and risky addons have a note that some addons from the repo could be risky.
5) If a repo author doesnt want to be in your list be respectful and remove them(or dont but then makes you seem shady and untrustworthy)
However I do think some addons/repos are better left in the shadows for reasons. We all may know something exists but doesnt need to be front and center on a site. It could also lead to bad things for noobs that dont fully understand what they are getting into.
|