Most Insane Obama Conspiracy Theory Yet

Think Rav beat you to that joke by a page or so

To be fair, I made that joke in March. What's the statute of limitations on jokes, anyway?

Depends. If you're Jeff Foxworthy or Larry the Cable Guy you can ride that ***for a good 20 years.

probably why i missed it then... i wasnt thinking it was a joke'

Fossil records prove what exactly? ROFLCOPTER FAIL.

Evolution is a 100% proven theory? LOL FAIL

BLANKET STATEMENTS FOR THE WIN GUYS!!!. OH and fossils prove it all!! LOL. dumb. just dumb

Science affirms a believers standpoint time and time again. The only logical conclusion after witnessing life, is that there could NOT be a higher power

yes my grammar fails again. my fallacy owned timed and time again. happy? can you get over it. Yes I'm not editing them because they are still understandable. I.E proven by the rewrites
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Right after i ranted about having common sense of discernment between the unproven acceptance of origin of life; having no connection to the greater conversation. You find a 'crazy' to prove the point else wise. I get it. but the problem is your going out of your way to find the insane. just like there isn't insane people who don't believe.(sarcasm) it doesn't make common sense to find a weirdo to prove your point. hell a politician does not represent the 'norm'. I make a deal with you. please try having some common sense when pinpointing specific people to prove your points; And I'l work on the grammar ^^. thanks (there is grammar error here in this paragraph, but i dgaf because it's still understandable)

You bring about 'insane-bat-***-crazyness' to argue your points. But your logic of finding the 'special retards' to prove your argument is making a UN-logical 'stretch' to connect logical argumentation. Thereby proves your the weirdo in this greater conversation. making any and all fertile attempts to debunk believers position which is fine only if you try to use common sense and logic to do it. otherwise your just making yourself look bad.(there is grammar error here in this paragraph, but i dgaf because it's still understandable)

Kooljack vs. Candlejack? No matter which side of the argument you're on, when these two argue everybody loses. Get your pillows ready because we're about to see some blanket statements.

A smart religious person would imply that evolution is part of God's masterplan, not that evolution doesn't exist.

If when statements are blanketed, but not prove results, how does one? Why for there is to be definitely not at all for any reason WHATSEWEVER! If you thinking, then, "yeah" probably so, but who is to say? WHY WOULD THEY EVEN! I dare candlejack or candlestick or coolio, OR cooljack to prove me wrong. Invited and denied the truth, consequently.



amirite?

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

LIKE IGIVE A FUCK

you guys sound like me with those sentence structures

Fboms yall Fboms. woot i did that^^

Writing this letter stems from a desperation to be heard, if not by a court of law, then by a court of public opinion. As I'm sure you're aware, Kooljack has been fighting hard to provide unruly conspiracies with the necessary asylum to take root and spread. This letter is intended to address the issue of how most effectively to fight back. Our choice of strategy is critical because I've long thought it would be fun to try to explain to Kooljack how instead of pumping up the volume, we should spend a little more time listening to each other and trying to focus on how we can anneal discourse with honesty, clear thinking, and a sense of moral good. For the most part, I'm just curious as to how deep Kooljack will have to dig into his profanity thesaurus to formulate a response. Let me leave you with one last thought: Those who stand too close to the canvas of history while it is being woven may erroneously conclude that the stork is responsible for procreation.

We figured the best way to communicate with you is to speak your language.

Did it work?

My greeting:

What the shitting *** rainbow unicorn poop am I seeing on this page? O_o;

(dramatic)Imitation is the sincerest form of battery.

Currently off topic; but, does it matter to anyone that this isn't what Rick Santorum said but rather a question from an attendee? Talk about a horribly misleading subheader or a lack of reading comprehension. In any case, I was hoping that he had actually postulated something so ridiculous. Disappoint.

I pointed that out on the first page.

Things are looking up for President Obama

And none of that'll help Hillary get the election victory.

Taking bets now when Obama leaves the Whitehouse, how long until him and Michelle get a divorce?

Eh idk about that tbh, I don't pay attention to that *** at all.

I dont think hillary is going to get the nod from the party. A year away from the primary and she is already calling people racists. When in fact people who think like her are the true racists. Supporters of affirmative action people who think black people need more help because they are black are the true racists, you know the liberal progressives.

Eh, it's not even that. It's the fact she has a history of being power hungry and stop at nothing to get what she wants. It's no secret. People are finally starting to move away from the let's vote for a woman mentality and are starting to look at her record and character more closely.