Top Agent Said F.B.I. Would Stop Trump From Becoming President
“[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right?” asked a top F.B.I. lawyer, Lisa Page, in one text. “Right?!”
Peter Strzok, the agent overseeing the F.B.I.’s investigation into links between Mr. Trump’s campaign and Russia, answered, “No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it.”
Ummm.... yeah.......
Random Politics & Religion #37: W/ Bubba The Love Sponge
|
Forum » Everything Else »
Politics and Religion
»
Random Politics & Religion #37: w/ Bubba the Love Sponge
Random Politics & Religion #37: w/ Bubba the Love Sponge
Now we obviously do not know the full story on what it was they tried or did. Maybe with the investigation Barr is doing we will find out.
[+]
Viciouss said: » There is no evidence that anybody did anything wrong. Methinks I have an opportunity to use this quote....
[+]
Odin.Slore said: » Now we obviously do not know the full story on what it was they tried or did. Maybe with the investigation Barr is doing we will find out. Except, they already testified to Congress, multiple times. Nothing came of it, they didn't do anything. Viciouss said: » Odin.Slore said: » Now we obviously do not know the full story on what it was they tried or did. Maybe with the investigation Barr is doing we will find out. Except, they already testified to Congress, multiple times. Nothing came of it, they didn't do anything. It is the same ***with Trump man. They all said stupid ***but no one actually did anything. How are the two different?
[+]
Odin.Slore said: » Viciouss said: » Odin.Slore said: » Now we obviously do not know the full story on what it was they tried or did. Maybe with the investigation Barr is doing we will find out. Except, they already testified to Congress, multiple times. Nothing came of it, they didn't do anything. It is the same ***with Trump man. They all said stupid ***but no one actually did anything. How are the two different? Not sure I understand your question. Yes, Trump says stupid ***everyday, gives stupid orders everyday, gets ignored everyday, been saved quite a few times by simply being ignored. What exactly is your point here? *Sidenote - At least you realized that the Strozk/Page affair is over and done with and nothing came of it. Viciouss said: » Odin.Slore said: » Viciouss said: » Odin.Slore said: » Now we obviously do not know the full story on what it was they tried or did. Maybe with the investigation Barr is doing we will find out. Except, they already testified to Congress, multiple times. Nothing came of it, they didn't do anything. It is the same ***with Trump man. They all said stupid ***but no one actually did anything. How are the two different? Not sure I understand your question. Yes, Trump says stupid ***everyday, gives stupid orders everyday, gets ignored everyday, been saved quite a few times by simply being ignored. What exactly is your point here? *Sidenote - At least you realized that the Strozk/Page affair is over and done with and nothing came of it. I am specifically talking about the comparison to Trumps apparent obstruction accusations. How can you dismiss one person for saying stupid ***that had no outcome to Trump saying stupid ***that had no outcome? You let one slide but cry impeachment for another? Cannot have it both ways.
[+]
Odin.Slore said: » Viciouss said: » Odin.Slore said: » Viciouss said: » Odin.Slore said: » Now we obviously do not know the full story on what it was they tried or did. Maybe with the investigation Barr is doing we will find out. Except, they already testified to Congress, multiple times. Nothing came of it, they didn't do anything. It is the same ***with Trump man. They all said stupid ***but no one actually did anything. How are the two different? Not sure I understand your question. Yes, Trump says stupid ***everyday, gives stupid orders everyday, gets ignored everyday, been saved quite a few times by simply being ignored. What exactly is your point here? *Sidenote - At least you realized that the Strozk/Page affair is over and done with and nothing came of it. I am specifically talking about the comparison to Trumps apparent obstruction accusations. How can you dismiss one person for saying stupid ***that had no outcome to Trump saying stupid ***that had no outcome? You let one slide but cry impeachment for another? Cannot have it both ways. Probably because there is a difference between hypotheticals and actual events occurring. The two FBI lovebirds talked to each other about doing stuff, Trump actually gave orders to obstruct a real investigation. Odin.Slore said: » Viciouss said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » MORE IMPORTANTLY! The New York Times, the Liberal bastion of freedom and hope and everything holy and sacred to them, full of so much righteous unbiased journalism, is confirming that their Messiah used spies against Trump Campaign???????????????????????????? Lol, should probably check out that NYT article, instead of listening to nausi's idiocy. The FBI sent a couple of people to talk to one guy in London, if that's the extent of the "spying" conspiracy theory, its going down in flames, just like everything else nausi says. Oh and it has nothing to do with the Obama. Zip. The FBI has never worked for any President, ever. Right now, Trump has no involvement with anything they do. When he snaps his fingers, nothing happens. Bro.... did you miss the whole fbi texts between that guy and the woman on how they can stop Trump? Surely your memory is not that bad. There are very few corners remaining that lefties can still pretend obama didn't have a hand in illegally using the justice department to spy on a political opponent. That wont stop the more desperate from sticking their finger in their ears. Actually we can stand here in the wide open and ask, where is the evidence? What is taking you so long to provide it?
Viciouss said: » Actually we can stand here in the wide open and ask, where is the evidence? What is taking you so long to provide it? The cognitive dissonance is astounding. How many years were we saying this while you and yours were harping about the "obvious" collusion?
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Viciouss said: » Actually we can stand here in the wide open and ask, where is the evidence? What is taking you so long to provide it? The cognitive dissonance is astounding. How many years were we saying this while you and yours were harping about the "obvious" collusion? Nice deflection. We have been asking nausi for evidence for any one of his many conspiracies for far longer, and have still gotten nothing. Hence why all of his conspiracies never actually turn out to be true. That should say none of his conspiracies turn out to be true, dumb phone.
All conspiracies are true especially the ones about aliens living in New Mexico or Mexico it doesn't matter...
Viciouss said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Viciouss said: » Actually we can stand here in the wide open and ask, where is the evidence? What is taking you so long to provide it? The cognitive dissonance is astounding. How many years were we saying this while you and yours were harping about the "obvious" collusion? Nice deflection. We have been asking nausi for evidence for any one of his many conspiracies for far longer, and have still gotten nothing. Hence why all of his conspiracies never actually turn out to be true. So, your defense is that you know I'm right, but it's okay because Nausi? I'm not sure how to respond to that. This will have to suffice:
[+]
Bahamut.Ravael said: » Viciouss said: » Bahamut.Ravael said: » Viciouss said: » Actually we can stand here in the wide open and ask, where is the evidence? What is taking you so long to provide it? The cognitive dissonance is astounding. How many years were we saying this while you and yours were harping about the "obvious" collusion? Nice deflection. We have been asking nausi for evidence for any one of his many conspiracies for far longer, and have still gotten nothing. Hence why all of his conspiracies never actually turn out to be true. So, your defense is that you know I'm right, but it's okay because Nausi? Yeah I never said that, but that was cute and all. Keep up that deflection on nausi's behalf tho. Remember that voter fraud conspiracy in Texas that Trump and nausi tried to pounce on?
Went down in flames It was fake from the get go, and it cost the acting Secretary of State his chance at keeping his job. Bahamut.Ravael said: » I'm just surprised that they banned Farrakhan. Dude's a freaking loony toon, but he's got Democrat friends in high places. I mean look at Utube and facebook. Loony toon alone isn't near enough. Nor are conspiracy theories. This tinfoil hat hijinx is reaching new lows every second. Still thinking there was obstruction and collusion. Still holding faith that Trump is illegitimate. That this great economy is somehow the result of obama, and that if Obama justice department spied on trump, it had to be because it was warranted.
Your cognitive dissonance is running out of places to hide. Judgement day is coming. sign the petition against making it illegal to film/record the police.
https://cms.fightforthefuture.org/illinois-just-made-it-felony-film-cops/?fbclid=IwAR0fet-xWKYbciT-PQEDtRrigf-eMn9nPVbZ5fUq5A49ajGA30Af8p92CoI Nausi said: » This tinfoil hat hijinx is reaching new lows every second. Still thinking there was obstruction and collusion. Still holding faith that Trump is illegitimate. That this great economy is somehow the result of obama, and that if Obama justice department spied on trump, it had to be because it was warranted. Your cognitive dissonance is running out of places to hide. Judgement day is coming. This is just nausi ducking out as usual when pressed for evidence of his conspiracies. But I liked the Judgement Day shoutout. Trump tweets support for far-right figures banned by Facebook
Quote: New York (CNN)Facebook barred seven users from its services earlier this week, citing its policies against "dangerous individuals and organizations." Now President Donald Trump is siding with the people who were banned and railing against social media "censorship" -- all along using one of his favorite social sites. The president shared more than a dozen tweets about the subject on Friday night and Saturday morning. And he conveniently avoided the fact that some of the banned users are extremists who make a living by deceiving their fans....
[+]
Quote: New York (CNN)And he conveniently avoided the fact that some of the banned users are extremists who make a living by deceiving their fans.... So they're the mainstream media?
[+]
I did think that
Quote: by deceiving their fans We knew that Facebook taking a stand against hate speech was going to bring immediate tears from Trump, and he hasn't disappointed.
Viciouss said: » We knew that Facebook taking a stand against hate speech was going to bring immediate tears from Trump, and he hasn't disappointed. Well, it also brought tears from Samuel L. Jackson.
[+]
Garuda.Chanti said: » Trump tweets support for far-right figures banned by Facebook Quote: New York (CNN)Facebook barred seven users from its services earlier this week, citing its policies against "dangerous individuals and organizations." Now President Donald Trump is siding with the people who were banned and railing against social media "censorship" -- all along using one of his favorite social sites. The president shared more than a dozen tweets about the subject on Friday night and Saturday morning. And he conveniently avoided the fact that some of the banned users are extremists who make a living by deceiving their fans.... I wish Facebook would ban me so I don't have to see 800 pictures of someone's kid that I don't even know...
[+]
Quote: The president shared more than a dozen tweets about the subject on Friday night and Saturday morning. And he conveniently avoided the fact that some of the banned users are extremists who make a living by deceiving their fans.... Not gonna lie they had us in the first half. CNN article but I gave it the benefit of the doubt. How do any of those banned make a living from deceiving anyone? They all have advertisers.
[+]
Odin.Slore said: » Quote: The president shared more than a dozen tweets about the subject on Friday night and Saturday morning. And he conveniently avoided the fact that some of the banned users are extremists who make a living by deceiving their fans.... Not gonna lie they had us in the first half. CNN article but I gave it the benefit of the doubt. How do any of those banned make a living from deceiving anyone? They all have advertisers. It's a good thing that CNN covered this, as they're the experts. If anyone knows how to make a living from deceiving people, it's CNN.
[+]
|
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.