This one is deep but important and I think well balanced even if it is from Slate.
The President and Congress Are Thinking of Changing This Important Internet Law
But they don’t understand it.
Excerpts so you know WTF its about:
Quote:
“No other sentence in the U.S. Code,” technology scholar David Post has written, “has been responsible for the creation of more value than” a little-known provision of the Communications Decency Act called Section 230....
Section 230 has a simple, sensible goal: to free internet companies from the responsibilities of traditional publishers.... The law states: “No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.”
There seem to be two sides about what this all means and what should we do with it. The article says they both have it wrong.
They quote the dude that wrote the thing.