Random Politics & Religion #01

No it's mostly because that's all you really seem to have to defend yourself... There are actual valid arguments for your side of the coin many times but instead you mostly seem to rely on comprehension do you got it or yeah stupid liberals and their feels... You rarely if ever put together a coherent argument that would hold water anywhere... So you pretend to be talking about this or that or just insult someone's intelligence to deflect like you did right there...

I'm too much in a good mood today to care about your bs lol.

You mean like this.






Yeah.

Way to prove my point for me...

BORING!!!

What's your excuse then?

Ford has never even made a vehicle that was able to be driven down the road to start with. Autonomous Ford's /laugh

p.s.

I bet everyone will love the strobe lights going by all night long.

I mean, look, I get the automotive loyalty in this country. I'm badmouth GM left and right, but I still own two of them.

That said, why is everyone so down on Ford around here?

They're regular cars for regular folks. Like any other sub-$40k domestic.

Highly doubt it's in the visible spectrum by the naked eye. Don't really feel like looking up the datasheet for the HDL-32E.

Soooo...how about that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton getting sued by the U.S Securities and Exchange Commission on top of his felony criminal indictments for defrauding investors?

This guy sounds fun..

This is what happens when I'm not around !

I have zero problem using all this stuff to increase safety, but I draw the line at removing human influence altogether.

Conservatives don't mind progress, it is when progress refuses to check itself and blindly runs ahead when we run into problems.

You've obviously never cooned a pumpkin.

So, no need for the citation needed pic.. Thanks for nothing.

Is it just a lawsuit or has he really been indicted?

This hit state-wide at the beginning of the year.

If you're capable of understanding and are bored enough:

http://velodynelidar.com/docs/datasheet/97-0038_Rev%20G_%20HDL-32E_Datasheet_Web.pdf

Not true.

A conservative doesn't want change just to change ***.

If the advancement of society requires change in the environment (doesn't mean physical environment, just changes in the overall structure of the world or industry), a conservative generally would want that change to occur. But that doesn't mean we have to change something because somebody either A) got offended and feels were hurt, B) demands change to prevent feels from being hurt or C) just because.

Change never means progress. Because most change is either a sidegrade or downgrade from the original.

Last August, actually.

It requires driving around in the dead of the night without lights(normally teenagers!). Something every country person is able to do at least... If you really need me to tell you what it is I feel sorry about your childhood.

You mean people don't always do this?

Change never means progress because progress only happens when everyone benefits. Equal rights is progress, and yes, there are idiots and bigots out there who will fight against that.

But not everything needs to be changed or changed to what a progressive thinks is right. Case in point: Obamacare, where beforehand you were given the option of having health insurance or not, now you are required by law to have it, if you can afford it or not. Progressives make it sound like only the super poor can't afford it, but losing 9.5% of your paycheck (the maximum amount that can be legally charged to an employee) before taxes is still a significant amount, especially if you were living paycheck by paycheck before you were forced into this law.

How is that progress, when you put people in a worse situation than before?

I'm a Dodge guy, never owned anything that wasn't. Never needed to since they last forever..

It's fun?

Buy a used Dodge for half the price and it'll still last twice as long. xD