So I had responded to this earlier but ran into a snag when I hit the submit button.. Now that that is taken care of.
Your definition of fetus is terrible and deliberately vague, and your idea of a fertilized egg being a human being with rights is incorrect.
Yes, It is deliberately vague. What gives you or I the right to decide when a unborn child is a human. What gives anyone the right to kill a unborn child or treat it differently than a human?
Like I said before here, countless fertilized eggs die each year by failing to attach to the uterus wall.
I didn't see you say this, even if you did it is meaningless since it is a completely natural event. You will have a hard time finding anyone to argue with over that.. The problem is when a doctor intercedes and actually kills the unborn child.
Now remember your solutions that you just presented give this unborn child rights because everyone is equal and we don't have to worry about religion or discrimination getting in the way anymore.
We cannot take away a born human being's rights on whims of people like you and deliberately vague definitions
Show me one post where I have ever advocated taking away anyone's rights. Don't waste your time, none exist.
I ask you what gives anyone the right to take away anyone's life?
At that point people like you are giving corpses more rights than living human women. (allowing them to dictate in life how their bodies in death can be used)
I guess I don't understand this. I think you mean "people like me want to give an unborn child rights, while taking them away from the mother" or you're going on about the natural process that rejects a fertilized embryo and think people like me somehow have control over that?
I'll go with what I think you said.. Since the other thing doesn't really make sense..
Does the mothers right to not give birth, trump a child's life?
Remember, Religion has nothing to do with this and you cannot discriminate against the unborn child.