Bloodrose said: »
maple flavored whiskey
....eww. Let's just hope that they don't make a Maple Syrup flavored soda....
OMG staph it! Next thing you know, there's a bacon flavored soda....
.....***.
Upcoming P+R Changes
|
Upcoming P+R changes
Now that's just disgusting and I hope nobody will ever make it.... ....eww. Let's just hope that they don't make a Maple Syrup flavored soda.... OMG staph it! Next thing you know, there's a bacon flavored soda.... .....***.
[+]
Asura.Floppyseconds said: » And could edit be restricted to 60 seconds instead? If it goes past that ammount of time on timestamp of the post then it is locked? Including any pending edit no longer being able to go through? I know the intention is to make people think before they post, but that is more likely wishful thinking than something that will become a reality. Thought about that. Ultimately decided to go with disabling it entirely, but if the reality after a bit shows we need something, then sure. As with any feature I introduce, if it clearly isn't working as intended, it can be changed or removed (two way blocks, anyone)? But this seemed like the best starting point, so we'll see how it goes. Ultimately, something had to change to make this section worth the hassle; can think of this as a first draft, if you like. If it works out, awesome - if it doesn't, we take the lessons from it and try the next thing. oh, so now I'm "you people", how very uncanadian of you to say.
faux canadiennes doesn't mean "young Canadian females", as faux means fake, or false. Still, I am no French Canadian, which is what term "Canadienne" means, not "young Canadian females". So you failed twice here. implied versus actual usage.
Actual usage wins. might as well stop while you're behind, and stop failing. Or i'll call you failiahfk. Bloodrose said: » oh, so now I'm "you people", how very uncanadian of you to say.  Don't mix you two lovebirds with the rest of the country.
[+]
Rooks said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » And could edit be restricted to 60 seconds instead? If it goes past that ammount of time on timestamp of the post then it is locked? Including any pending edit no longer being able to go through? I know the intention is to make people think before they post, but that is more likely wishful thinking than something that will become a reality. Thought about that. Ultimately decided to go with disabling it entirely, but if the reality after a bit shows we need something, then sure. As with any feature I introduce, if it clearly isn't working as intended, it can be changed or removed (two way blocks, anyone)? But this seemed like the best starting point, so we'll see how it goes. Ultimately, something had to change to make this section worth the hassle; can think of this as a first draft, if you like. If it works out, awesome - if it doesn't, we take the lessons from it and try the next thing. Anna Ruthven said: » Rooks said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » And could edit be restricted to 60 seconds instead? If it goes past that ammount of time on timestamp of the post then it is locked? Including any pending edit no longer being able to go through? I know the intention is to make people think before they post, but that is more likely wishful thinking than something that will become a reality. Thought about that. Ultimately decided to go with disabling it entirely, but if the reality after a bit shows we need something, then sure. As with any feature I introduce, if it clearly isn't working as intended, it can be changed or removed (two way blocks, anyone)? But this seemed like the best starting point, so we'll see how it goes. Ultimately, something had to change to make this section worth the hassle; can think of this as a first draft, if you like. If it works out, awesome - if it doesn't, we take the lessons from it and try the next thing.
[+]
Anna Ruthven said: » Rooks said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » And could edit be restricted to 60 seconds instead? If it goes past that ammount of time on timestamp of the post then it is locked? Including any pending edit no longer being able to go through? I know the intention is to make people think before they post, but that is more likely wishful thinking than something that will become a reality. Thought about that. Ultimately decided to go with disabling it entirely, but if the reality after a bit shows we need something, then sure. As with any feature I introduce, if it clearly isn't working as intended, it can be changed or removed (two way blocks, anyone)? But this seemed like the best starting point, so we'll see how it goes. Ultimately, something had to change to make this section worth the hassle; can think of this as a first draft, if you like. If it works out, awesome - if it doesn't, we take the lessons from it and try the next thing. But not all of use what to talk about Anime and whatever else is on this site ! Bloodrose said: » Anna Ruthven said: » Rooks said: » Asura.Floppyseconds said: » And could edit be restricted to 60 seconds instead? If it goes past that ammount of time on timestamp of the post then it is locked? Including any pending edit no longer being able to go through? I know the intention is to make people think before they post, but that is more likely wishful thinking than something that will become a reality. Thought about that. Ultimately decided to go with disabling it entirely, but if the reality after a bit shows we need something, then sure. As with any feature I introduce, if it clearly isn't working as intended, it can be changed or removed (two way blocks, anyone)? But this seemed like the best starting point, so we'll see how it goes. Ultimately, something had to change to make this section worth the hassle; can think of this as a first draft, if you like. If it works out, awesome - if it doesn't, we take the lessons from it and try the next thing.
[+]
Also, this thread is in P&R but Rooks hasn't posted as Drama Torama.
[+]
Cake versus Pie, the ultimate form of random P and R.
Choose your allegiance very carefully... or you'll get your just desserts!
[+]
Honestly we have block function I think moderation should take a hands off approach. If you don't like someone block them.
[+]
Anna Ruthven said: » Also, this thread is in P&R but Rooks hasn't posted as Drama Torama. Bloodrose said: » Cake versus Pie, the ultimate form of random P and R. Choose your allegiance very carefully... or you'll get your just desserts! Being insulted is part of life if you can't handle it on a website I can't see how you will get through life...
[+]
fonewear said: » Being insulted is part of life if you can't handle it on a website I can't see how you will get through life... Crying in a corner because somebody from a different country called your mom fat. Anna Ruthven said: » Also, this thread is in P&R but Rooks hasn't posted as Drama Torama. I post as Drama Torama when I'm participating in the discussion (or moderating actual P+R talk). I don't use it when I'm just being social or acting as an administrator. fonewear said: » Honestly we have block function I think moderation should take a hands off approach. If you don't like someone block them. Or, posters who don't bring anything of value to the discussion can just not be allowed to post anymore. You in particular generate a tremendous volume of complaints with posts that somehow manage to be both nonsensical AND offensive, so I can see why you'd want less moderation.
[+]
Where's my breadsticks? I need my breadsticks!
The only reporter you need to understand is April O'Neil from Channel 6 News!
[+]
|
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2025 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.