|
Are All Terrorists Muslims? It’s Not Even Close
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-16 14:24:06
No. I really think it isn't. Debating religion just makes everyone mad or frustrated and no one ever gains anything of value from it. Cause atheists will stay atheists, and theists will stick to their faith.
It's just fertile ground for hostility. It's why I try to stay away most of the time. Try.
Cerberus.Anjisnu
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2803
By Cerberus.Anjisnu 2015-01-16 14:26:51
Hey the bible says you should do whatever the f I say seha!
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:27:07
Thank you. You actually pointed out my point. It doesn't matter what we think. He is either there or he isn't, regardless of what we believe. Like I said earlier. The earth revolved around the sun long before we thought so. Then why are you arguing if it doesn't matter to you if he exists or not? It does matter whether he exists. What doesn't matter is whether its because we think he does. So, it matters if he exists, even though it doesn't matter what we think if he exists or not?
What we think defines if he even existed. If we think he existed, then there is the possibility that he existed. If we don't think he ever existed, then he never existed period. So, it does matter if we think he existed or not.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:27:13
No. I really think it isn't. Debating religion just makes everyone mad or frustrated and no one ever gains anything of value from it. Cause atheists will stay atheists, and theists will stick to their faith.
It's just fertile ground for hostility. It's why I try to stay away most of the time. Try. Why though? Why do we have to tie our emotions to our beliefs? Shouldn't we want to test their validity against other arguments? I never take these things personally. You will never see me call someone a name, or start throwing rocks. They are simply ideas. Ideas are neither good or bad. If you are going to live your life based on these ideas, I would want someone to scrutinize them because maybe Im wrong. There is nothing wrong with being wrong. If that happens then you just learned something new, or grew intellectually.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-01-16 14:28:31
It's not very often that I can look at a group people arguing two sides of an argument and think that not even one of them has a clue. Will you stop jumping in and saying "Youre all wrong! Bye!" and give a reason for something? lol
As soon as I have time to write out a thorough and coherent response, I'd love to. Right now it's like I'm watching 1st graders debate the pros and cons of a piece of classical art, though, so I'm not sure where to begin anyway.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:28:34
Because arguing with theists is like hitting your head against a brick wall. That wall won't budge, and you end up with a splitting headache afterwards.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:29:06
It's not very often that I can look at a group people arguing two sides of an argument and think that not even one of them has a clue. Will you stop jumping in and saying "Youre all wrong! Bye!" and give a reason for something? lol
As soon as I have time to write out a thorough and coherent response, I'd love to. Right now it's like I'm watching 1st graders debate the pros and cons of a piece of classical art, though, so I'm not sure where to begin anyway. Hey! I should be at least in the 2nd grade by now!
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:29:56
Thank you. You actually pointed out my point. It doesn't matter what we think. He is either there or he isn't, regardless of what we believe. Like I said earlier. The earth revolved around the sun long before we thought so. Then why are you arguing if it doesn't matter to you if he exists or not? It does matter whether he exists. What doesn't matter is whether its because we think he does. So, it matters if he exists, even though it doesn't matter what we think if he exists or not?
What we think defines if he even existed. If we think he existed, then there is the possibility that he existed. If we don't think he ever existed, then he never existed period. So, it does matter if we think he existed or not. No, I must not have articulated that very well. What we think, is irrelevant to his existence. I understand your argument. From the position of believing that God is made up, then it is natural to think that without man, he wouldnt exist.
In reality, the actuality of God, whether he really exists or not, has nothing to do with what we think. Obviously, if he doesn't, then we made him up. If he does, then he is there no matter what we think.
Short version. I believe in God. If he really isnt there, then I made him up. If he is, then he is there even if I stop believing.
You don't believe in God. If he really isnt there, then you are right, we made him up. If he is, then he is there even if you don't think he is.
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:31:25
You believe he had crimes against the state because a man wrote it. I believe in the story of His divinity because i believe the writers were divinely inspired by the Holy Spirit. I find it hypocritical that you believe one man's writing from 2000 years ago if its in favor of your view but denounce one that opposes it by saying "it was written 2000 years ago"
We accept that a man named Jesus founded (or at least semi-inspired) a strange sect of Judaism and was martyred by the Roman Empire because of it around 30ish AD because
this is important, don't gloss over it
Christians came out of nowhere to be a pretty widespread cult by 100 AD. Something happened, and even if the logistics of the Christianity we know today ultimately had way more to do with Paul, they weren't his ideas originally because other Christian sects existed all around the Empire without his knowledge or consent. Paul was often writing about the herisies and the false teachers so i agree with a bunch of unconsented churches sprouting. But if God is real i believe He could and did keep His word pure and the gospel undefiled. * MUST GO BACK TO WORK!!!** ttyl
I'm not trying to evaluate who had the right of what Jesus's life actually meant. I'm just observing that where there's smoke, there's fire; the overnight existence of multiple cults tracing lineage to one spiritual leader can confirm the existence of that leader even if everything said about him is legend.
Muhammad is actually a much better example of this: you might think everything the Qu'ran says about his life is false, but somebody unified the Arabian peninsula in the seventh century and everybody says it was him, so at the very least he most likely existed. Back for a moment. Jesus is actually the most quoted prophet in the Quaran. The separation between Jews comes from the same father, namely Abraham. Abraham forced one child with his wifes maidservant and then had the child of promise when he was 120 years old. The promise was made to the first born of promise, which would be the son he had when it was nigh impossible. Muslims follow the son who was exiled and the jews followed Isaac.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-01-16 14:31:49
It's not very often that I can look at a group people arguing two sides of an argument and think that not even one of them has a clue. Will you stop jumping in and saying "Youre all wrong! Bye!" and give a reason for something? lol
As soon as I have time to write out a thorough and coherent response, I'd love to. Right now it's like I'm watching 1st graders debate the pros and cons of a piece of classical art, though, so I'm not sure where to begin anyway. Hey! I should be at least in the 2nd grade by now! Then pick on someone your own size! Also, my dad can beat up your dad.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:32:15
Thank you. You actually pointed out my point. It doesn't matter what we think. He is either there or he isn't, regardless of what we believe. Like I said earlier. The earth revolved around the sun long before we thought so. Then why are you arguing if it doesn't matter to you if he exists or not? It does matter whether he exists. What doesn't matter is whether its because we think he does. So, it matters if he exists, even though it doesn't matter what we think if he exists or not?
What we think defines if he even existed. If we think he existed, then there is the possibility that he existed. If we don't think he ever existed, then he never existed period. So, it does matter if we think he existed or not. No, I must not have articulated that very well. What we think, is irrelevant to his existence. I understand your argument. From the position of believing that God is made up, then it is natural to think that without man, he wouldnt exist.
In reality, the actuality of God, whether he really exists or not, has nothing to do with what we think. Obviously, if he doesn't, then we made him up. If he does, then he is there no matter what we think. In reality, would God exist if religion never existed?
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2015-01-16 14:33:02
It's not very often that I can look at a group people arguing two sides of an argument and think that not even one of them has a clue.
Great, we needed an Imam in the thread. Enlighten pls.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:33:36
It's not very often that I can look at a group people arguing two sides of an argument and think that not even one of them has a clue. Will you stop jumping in and saying "Youre all wrong! Bye!" and give a reason for something? lol
As soon as I have time to write out a thorough and coherent response, I'd love to. Right now it's like I'm watching 1st graders debate the pros and cons of a piece of classical art, though, so I'm not sure where to begin anyway. Hey! I should be at least in the 2nd grade by now! Then pick on someone your own size! Also, my dad can beat up your dad.And there is the start of every religious war known to man.
"My Father can beat up your Father!"
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2015-01-16 14:33:46
No. I really think it isn't. Debating religion just makes everyone mad or frustrated and no one ever gains anything of value from it. Cause atheists will stay atheists, and theists will stick to their faith.
It's just fertile ground for hostility. It's why I try to stay away most of the time. Try.
Then you must really hate sports.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:33:56
Thank you. You actually pointed out my point. It doesn't matter what we think. He is either there or he isn't, regardless of what we believe. Like I said earlier. The earth revolved around the sun long before we thought so. Then why are you arguing if it doesn't matter to you if he exists or not? It does matter whether he exists. What doesn't matter is whether its because we think he does. So, it matters if he exists, even though it doesn't matter what we think if he exists or not?
What we think defines if he even existed. If we think he existed, then there is the possibility that he existed. If we don't think he ever existed, then he never existed period. So, it does matter if we think he existed or not. No, I must not have articulated that very well. What we think, is irrelevant to his existence. I understand your argument. From the position of believing that God is made up, then it is natural to think that without man, he wouldnt exist.
In reality, the actuality of God, whether he really exists or not, has nothing to do with what we think. Obviously, if he doesn't, then we made him up. If he does, then he is there no matter what we think. In reality, would God exist if religion never existed? Come on King. We've been through this. If he actually exists, then he would exists regardless of religion, or our beliefs, or w/e. If God really exists and humans never did, he wouldn't cease to exist. He is either there or he isn't and it doesn't matter if we think he is or isnt.
By Bloodrose 2015-01-16 14:34:03
The Native American peoples believe in a "Creator", but is not all powerful or omnipotent.
I am a descendant of these people, and have witnessed many of the rituals that were not destroyed by Christian and Catholic people.
Yet I was raised to be Christian, and to develop my beliefs based on the Christian Doctrine.
However, I have opted, after many years of looking into many different religions, and spiritual customs, have opted to be more Spiritual.
In the Native American culture, "God" does not exist, but a Creator does. a Creator is not omnipotent, omniscient, or all encompassing (meaning in this context, to be everywhere). They perform a cleansing ritual using a plant called sage, and the smoke that comes from it, to waft it over their bodies to converse with their spirit animals or with the Creator. It is in bad taste among the various cultures to ask the Creator for more than what was provided, however it is quite alright to ask the Creator to watch over them, or others during times of hardship.
That aside, "God" works in much the same way. "God" has already provided us with everything we could possibly need, yet needs nothing in return. Not even our devotion. People pray for forgiveness, when it is not he who forgives, as he does not judge. We ask for patience, when we already have it, yet fail to exercise it, most notably when we are offered limitless possibilities to do so.
If we have indeed, been given everything we need, and he needs nothing in return, why, then, do we in turn (as humans) believe that we can interpret God's will, and enforce it, if that will is ultimately free will? Under what illusion of God's will do we have free will, if we choose to do something in the name of God because it is his will, and not our own?
Morals are also subjective to what kind of beliefs you have, how you were raised, or how you interpret the entirety of everything you know, believe, or perceive. Humans are not inherently wicked, nor are they inherently good. Humans are survivalists, but also squishy and soft. One could argue, that because of our advances in medicine and science, we have surpassed the realm of evolution, into the realm of being a creator, although more accurately, a provider. We've begun to dabble in the science of mutations, and have been the express cause of forced evolution upon that which we decree is beneath us, often as a side effect, and to a lesser extent, as a benefit to us, rather than to all that live with us.
[+]
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:34:51
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles.
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-16 14:36:07
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Then you must really hate sports. Someone wins in sports. There is a goal and those able to achieve it win the match, run, or whatever. You have no need to debate "rooting for this team is better because.." no one does that. Only who's better at playing and be happy/sad depending on whether your side won or not.
[+]
By ScaevolaBahamut 2015-01-16 14:37:44
. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles.
As I explained, the evidence of the existence of Jesus as an historical figure has basically nothing to do with anything specifically attributed to him.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:37:50
Thank you. You actually pointed out my point. It doesn't matter what we think. He is either there or he isn't, regardless of what we believe. Like I said earlier. The earth revolved around the sun long before we thought so. Then why are you arguing if it doesn't matter to you if he exists or not? It does matter whether he exists. What doesn't matter is whether its because we think he does. So, it matters if he exists, even though it doesn't matter what we think if he exists or not?
What we think defines if he even existed. If we think he existed, then there is the possibility that he existed. If we don't think he ever existed, then he never existed period. So, it does matter if we think he existed or not. No, I must not have articulated that very well. What we think, is irrelevant to his existence. I understand your argument. From the position of believing that God is made up, then it is natural to think that without man, he wouldnt exist.
In reality, the actuality of God, whether he really exists or not, has nothing to do with what we think. Obviously, if he doesn't, then we made him up. If he does, then he is there no matter what we think. In reality, would God exist if religion never existed? Come on King. We've been through this. If he actually exists, then he would exists regardless of religion, or our beliefs, or w/e. If God really exists and humans never did, he wouldn't cease to exist. He is either there or he isn't and it doesn't matter what we think. Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:38:52
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles.
Scholars agree on the historicity of Jesus. We have testimonials that date to only a decade after his existence from various, independent sources. All of which make the same claims. You'll have to do the research for this, it would take a book for me to type all of that out.
Now, to put that into perspective, the earliest documents we have of Alexander the Great occured 600 years after his death. You can't reject whether Jesus existed without rejecting the existence of Alexander and Ceasar Augustus. If that is your stance, then that's fine. There can be no more argument because you simply reject historical documents.
[+]
Cerberus.Anjisnu
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2803
By Cerberus.Anjisnu 2015-01-16 14:38:56
Come on King. We've been through this. If he actually exists, then he would exists regardless of religion, or our beliefs, or w/e. If God really exists and humans never did, he wouldn't cease to exist. He is either there or he isn't and it doesn't matter if we think he is or isnt.
If we go by your way of thinking. If god exist, something created it, if something created it, something created what created it and so on infinitely. So which god do you want to believe in?
Potato Jesus I'm a Russetarian
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:39:53
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles. Nobody is denying that Jesus (the man) existed. But his miracles are in question.
I could write a book about you as a person who flew on unicorns all around the world in a different universe. You would argue that those events happened because the book wrote about a real person (you), even though it is impossible for you do preform anything written in that book (so-called miracles).
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:40:57
The Native American peoples believe in a "Creator", but is not all powerful or omnipotent.
I am a descendant of these people, and have witnessed many of the rituals that were not destroyed by Christian and Catholic people.
Yet I was raised to be Christian, and to develop my beliefs based on the Christian Doctrine.
However, I have opted, after many years of looking into many different religions, and spiritual customs, have opted to be more Spiritual.
In the Native American culture, "God" does not exist, but a Creator does. a Creator is not omnipotent, omniscient, or all encompassing (meaning in this context, to be everywhere). They perform a cleansing ritual using a plant called sage, and the smoke that comes from it, to waft it over their bodies to converse with their spirit animals or with the Creator. It is in bad taste among the various cultures to ask the Creator for more than what was provided, however it is quite alright to ask the Creator to watch over them, or others during times of hardship.
That aside, "God" works in much the same way. "God" has already provided us with everything we could possibly need, yet needs nothing in return. Not even our devotion. People pray for forgiveness, when it is not he who forgives, as he does not judge. We ask for patience, when we already have it, yet fail to exercise it, most notably when we are offered limitless possibilities to do so.
If we have indeed, been given everything we need, and he needs nothing in return, why, then, do we in turn (as humans) believe that we can interpret God's will, and enforce it, if that will is ultimately free will? Under what illusion of God's will do we have free will, if we choose to do something in the name of God because it is his will, and not our own?
Morals are also subjective to what kind of beliefs you have, how you were raised, or how you interpret the entirety of everything you know, believe, or perceive. Humans are not inherently wicked, nor are they inherently good. Humans are survivalists, but also squishy and soft. One could argue, that because of our advances in medicine and science, we have surpassed the realm of evolution, into the realm of being a creator, although more accurately, a provider. We've begun to dabble in the science of mutations, and have been the express cause of forced evolution upon that which we decree is beneath us, often as a side effect, and to a lesser extent, as a benefit to us, rather than to all that live with us. Ground morals aren't subjective. I knew when i was a child without being told that lying was wrong. I sensed and felt bad without anyone teaching me that its wrong. Murder is wrong, its written on the human heart to have these basic instincts. The conscience can be seared if its constantly underminded. Eventually you have no conscience. But i strongly disagree that morals are taught. Theyre inherent.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:41:07
Come on King. We've been through this. If he actually exists, then he would exists regardless of religion, or our beliefs, or w/e. If God really exists and humans never did, he wouldn't cease to exist. He is either there or he isn't and it doesn't matter if we think he is or isnt.
If we go by your way of thinking. If god exist, something created it, if something created it, something created what created it and so on infinitely. So which god do you want to believe in?
Wrong. If something exists outside of the space-time continuum, which is where God would have to exist to create the Big Bang (This is where time began - There was no time before hand), then it needs no creator. Unless you exist within our space and time, you have no need for a beginning and end. It's comparing the beginning and end of a straight line and a circle.
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2015-01-16 14:41:13
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »Then you must really hate sports. Someone wins in sports. There is a goal and those able to achieve it win the match, run, or whatever. You have no need to debate "rooting for this team is better because.." no one does that. Only who's better at playing and be happy/sad depending on whether your side won or not.
And yet people stick to their guns despite losing streaks or facts (stats) that say one team is better/worse than another. It's the same *** - some people are fanatical, some people stick to the facts and some people bandwagon.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:42:40
Come on King. We've been through this. If he actually exists, then he would exists regardless of religion, or our beliefs, or w/e. If God really exists and humans never did, he wouldn't cease to exist. He is either there or he isn't and it doesn't matter if we think he is or isnt.
If we go by your way of thinking. If god exist, something created it, if something created it, something created what created it and so on infinitely. So which god do you want to believe in?
Wrong. If something exists outside of the space-time continuum, which is where God would have to exist to create the Big Bang (This is where time began - There was no time before hand), then it needs no creator. Unless you exist within our space and time, you have no need for a beginning and end. It's comparing the beginning and end of a straight line and a circle. Wait, are you saying that some intergalactic ancient alien created the universe?
Is your name Giorgio Tsoukalos?
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-16 14:43:03
You don't root for a team based on which is better(maybe children). It's usually your town, or the team that your family rooted for and you grow attached to it all the same.
Either way it has nothing to do with what I said.
By ScaevolaBahamut 2015-01-16 14:43:22
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals.
Quote: What percentage of terror attacks in the United States and Europe are committed by Muslims? Guess. Nope. Guess again. And again...
“Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.” How many times have you heard that one? Sure, we heard Fox News’s Brian Kilmeade say it, but to me, that was simply part of the Fox News plan to make their viewers dumber, as we saw again this past weekend when its terrorism “expert” Steve Emerson was caught fabricating the story that Birmingham, England, is closed to non-Muslims. But more alarmingly, even some reasonable people have uttered this statement.
And that comment is often followed up by the question: Why don’t we see Christian, Buddhist, or Jewish terrorists?
Obviously, there are people who sincerely view themselves as Muslims who have committed horrible acts in the name of Islam. We Muslims can make the case that their actions are not based on any part of the faith but on their own political agenda. But they are Muslims, no denying that.
However, and this will probably shock many, so you might want to take a breath: Overwhelmingly, those who have committed terrorist attacks in the United States and Europe aren’t Muslims. Let’s give that a moment to sink in.
Now, it’s not your fault if you aren’t aware of that fact. You can blame the media. (Yes, Sarah Palin and I actually agree on one thing: The mainstream media sucks.)
So here are some statistics for those interested. Let’s start with Europe. Want to guess what percent of the terrorist attacks there were committed by Muslims over the past five years? Wrong. That is, unless you said less than 2 percent.
As Europol, the European Union’s law-enforcement agency, noted in its report released last year, the vast majority of terror attacks in Europe were perpetrated by separatist groups. For example, in 2013, there were 152 terror attacks in Europe. Only two of them were “religiously motivated,” while 84 were predicated upon ethno-nationalist or separatist beliefs.
Or what about the (dare I mention them) Jewish terrorists? Per the 2013 State Department’s report on terrorism, there were 399 acts of terror committed by Israeli settlers.
We are talking about groups like France’s FLNC, which advocates an independent nation for the island of Corsica. In December 2013, FLNC terrorists carried out simultaneous rocket attacks against police stations in two French cities. And in Greece in late 2013, the left-wing Militant Popular Revolutionary Forces shot and killed two members of the right-wing political party Golden Dawn. While over in Italy, the anarchist group FAI engaged in numerous terror attacks including sending a bomb to a journalist. And the list goes on and on.
Have you heard of these incidents? Probably not. But if Muslims had committed them do you think you our media would’ve covered it? No need to answer, that’s a rhetorical question.
Even after one of the worst terror attacks ever in Europe in 2011, when Anders Breivik slaughtered 77 people in Norway to further his anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and pro-“Christian Europe” agenda as he stated in his manifesto, how much press did we see in the United States? Yes, it was covered, but not the way we see when a Muslim terrorist is involved. Plus we didn’t see terrorism experts fill the cable news sphere asking how we can stop future Christian terrorists. In fact, even the suggestion that Breivik was a “Christian terrorist” was met with outrage by many, including Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly.
Have you heard about the Buddhist terrorists? Well, extremist Buddhists have killed many Muslim civilians in Burma, and just a few months ago in Sri Lanka, some went on a violent rampage burning down Muslim homes and businesses and slaughtering four Muslims.
Or what about the (dare I mention them) Jewish terrorists? Per the 2013 State Department’s report on terrorism, there were 399 acts of terror committed by Israeli settlers in what are known as “price tag” attacks. These Jewish terrorists attacked Palestinian civilians causing physical injuries to 93 of them and also vandalized scores of mosques and Christian churches.
Back in the United States, the percentage of terror attacks committed by Muslims is almost as miniscule as in Europe. An FBI study looking at terrorism committed on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 found that 94 percent of the terror attacks were committed by non-Muslims. In actuality, 42 percent of terror attacks were carried out by Latino-related groups, followed by 24 percent perpetrated by extreme left-wing actors.
And as a 2014 study by University of North Carolina found, since the 9/11 attacks, Muslim-linked terrorism has claimed the lives of 37 Americans. In that same time period, more than 190,000 Americans were murdered (PDF).
In fact in 2013, it was actually more likely Americans would be killed by a toddler than a terrorist. In that year, three Americans were killed in the Boston Marathon bombing. How many people did toddlers kill in 2013? Five, all by accidentally shooting a gun.
But our media simply do not cover the non-Muslim terror attacks with same gusto. Why? It’s a business decision. Stories about scary “others” play better. It’s a story that can simply be framed as good versus evil with Americans being the good guy and the brown Muslim as the bad.
Honestly, when is the last time we heard the media refer to those who attack abortion clinics as “Christian terrorists,” even though these attacks occur at one of every five reproductive health-care facilities? That doesn’t sell as well. After all we are a so-called Christian nation, so that would require us to look at the enemy within our country, and that makes many uncomfortable. Or worse, it makes them change the channel.
That’s the same reason we don’t see many stories about how to reduce the 30 Americans killed each day by gun violence or the three women per day killed by domestic violence. But the media will have on expert after expert discussing how can we stop these scary brown Muslims from killing any more Americans despite the fact you actually have a better chance of being killed by a refrigerator falling on you.
Look, this article is not going to change the media’s business model. But what I hope it does is cause some to realize that not all terrorists are Muslims. In fact, they are actually a very small percent of those that are. Now, I’m not saying to ignore the dangers posed by Islamic radicals. I’m just saying look out for those refrigerators.
Source
|
|