Are All Terrorists Muslims? It’s Not Even Close

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
Version 3.1
New Items
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Are All Terrorists Muslims? It’s Not Even Close
Are All Terrorists Muslims? It’s Not Even Close
First Page 2 3 ... 15 16 17 ... 23 24 25
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2015-01-16 19:24:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Semantics, but sounds more like convert than revert, as revert typically means returning to a former state of being.
 Bismarck.Ihina
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Ihina
Posts: 3187
By Bismarck.Ihina 2015-01-16 19:25:51
Link | Quote | Reply
 
He listed off 4 points, said 'I don't know' (or some variant) to three of them, concluded the 4th one must be the correct choice, then proceeded to describe his specific god.

No, he's not intelligent.
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-16 19:41:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
He listed off 4 points, said 'I don't know' (or some variant) to three of them, concluded the 4th one must be the correct choice, then proceeded to describe his specific god.

No, he's not intelligent.

He doesn't say he "doesn't know" or "some variant" to "three of them".

The first, that the universe came out of nothing is obscene. This isn't a legitimate theory. He is addressing what previous scholars and philosophers have entertained or hypothesized.
(wait, do you think the universe came out of nothing :O ?)
(He addresses this at minute 2:00)

The second, is as obscene as the first. Self-creation.
(He addresses this at Minute 2:16)

The third, the universe was created by something other than God, or another creation.

If you continued watching you would see he addresses all 4 scenarios, but it sounds like you stopped at 1:53.

Edit: You watched the same video I did and didn't see the above.
I won't be taking much notice of who you consider intelligent or dumb.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-16 19:47:11
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bloodrose said: »
Semantics, but sounds more like convert than revert, as revert typically means returning to a former state of being.

Well he identifies himself as a revert. But it should be noted Muslims believe they are created as Muslims and deviated away from it by life and circumstance.
 Asura.Alexandero
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: jalexan4
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 19:53:56
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Asura.Alexandero said: »
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Asura.Alexandero said: »
I haven't jumped through any hoops that I am aware of. I don't believe I get to decide how other people live and what is right and wrong for them, so I don't bother myself with making the attempts. I don't even make it to the "Oh, hey, he's gay. That's nice." part. I don't notice it. I don't care.

You wrote three paragraphs justifying your stance on homosexuality.

You obviously care.

It was an example to support my position. I could write about bacon instead if you like? Or tea, or alcohol, or drugs, w/e.

We're obviously not getting through to one another.

On some level, we're on the same page, as in we both don't care about other people's sexuality. The difference is, you need to come up with reasoning and justification so you wouldn't care about these things. It makes it sound like you need to convince yourself that not caring is the correct response to the issue.

Hence the question: why? Why do you need to come up with these reasons to believe what you do?

If you don't want to answer, then fine, it's not something I'll lose sleep over. I'm just puzzled by it, that's all.
Sorry, had to eat. Well, I like to have a reason to act in every way I act. Otherwise, there's no reason to act that way.

Why do I come up with a reason? Well, where I live, the norm is to condemn gays. I live in the Bible belt. As I was growing up, I realized that I acted and thought outside of that norm. So naturally, I asked "why". The reason turned out to be what I said above. I just don't feel the need to push my beliefs on others.

To state in a different way. The reason was borne from the realization that I was already acting in a non-conforming way. Initially, I had no reason. I just didn't think about the gay thing. I didn't care. When I realized that this was out of the norm, I was curious as to why I didn't care, so asked the question.
 Bismarck.Ihina
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Ihina
Posts: 3187
By Bismarck.Ihina 2015-01-16 19:54:44
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Blazed1979 said: »
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
He listed off 4 points, said 'I don't know' (or some variant) to three of them, concluded the 4th one must be the correct choice, then proceeded to describe his specific god.

No, he's not intelligent.

He doesn't say he "doesn't know" or "some variant" to "three of them".

The first, that the universe came out of nothing is obscene. This isn't a legitimate theory. He is addressing what previous scholars and philosophers have entertained or hypothesized.
(wait, do you think the universe came out of nothing :O ?)
(He addresses this at minute 2:00)

The second, is as obscene as the first. Self-creation.
(He addresses this at Minute 2:16)

The third, the universe was created by something other than God, or another creation.

If you continued watching you would see he addresses all 4 scenarios, but it sounds like you stopped at 1:53.

Edit: You watched the same video I did and didn't see the above.
I won't be taking much notice of who you consider intelligent or dumb.

Fine with me, who you notice or not notice isn't something that I'll lose sleep over either.

It's just interesting that we all (most?) chuckle when we hear stories of ancient people using the god of the gaps argument to prove the existence of god, but when the same kinds of people use the same arguments today, some people still pay them their respect.
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2015-01-16 19:54:54
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Blazed1979 said: »
Bloodrose said: »
Semantics, but sounds more like convert than revert, as revert typically means returning to a former state of being.

Well he identifies himself as a revert. But it should be noted Muslims believe they are created as Muslims and deviated away from it by life and circumstance.
that's a fair point, considering the religious beliefs.
 Asura.Alexandero
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: jalexan4
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 19:57:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh34Xsq7D_A

Here is a good debate that is on the original topic from IntelligenceSquared. Not stating my personal thoughts here because they are irrelevant. See what you guys think.

If you have a laptop beside you, I enjoy watching these while farming for hours on end. Maybe save for later.
 Odin.Godofgods
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4013
By Odin.Godofgods 2015-01-16 19:59:28
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quote:
Let's define "terrorist organization." A terrorist organization is an organization that makes you feel scared all the time and makes you change your behavior. What does CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC do all the time?

That's right.
Wolf Blitzer? Terrorist.
Glenn Beck? Terrorist.
Nancy Grace? Terrorist. Her AND her plastic surgeon.

The only news organization that is not a terrorist organization is the BBC. Because the BBC can make the worst things sound okay. [British accent] Hello, welcome to the BBC. Satan has re-entered the planet. He is picking up babies with his talons, ripping off their heads, and sucking out their souls. We're in for a thousand years of darkness, all hope is lost and now, the World Cup update.
-Christopher Titus
 Bismarck.Ihina
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Ihina
Posts: 3187
By Bismarck.Ihina 2015-01-16 20:05:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Asura.Alexandero said: »
Sorry, had to eat. Well, I like to have a reason to act in every way I act. Otherwise, there's no reason to act that way.

Why do I come up with a reason? Well, where I live, the norm is to condemn gays. I live in the Bible belt. As I was growing up, I realized that I acted and thought outside of that norm. So naturally, I asked "why". The reason turned out to be what I said above. I just don't feel the need to push my beliefs on others.

To state in a different way. The reason was borne from the realization that I was already acting in a non-conforming way. Initially, I had no reason. I just didn't think about the gay thing. I didn't care. When I realized that this was out of the norm, I was curious as to why I didn't care, so asked the question.

Fair enough. It's not impossible that I would have taken such steps/actions if I was brought up in similar conditions.

And I'll give you props for...not being...prejudice, I guess. There doesn't seem to be a way to say that without sounding judgmental or condescending. Just take it on good faith that it's sincere.
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-16 20:05:44
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
He listed off 4 points, said 'I don't know' (or some variant) to three of them, concluded the 4th one must be the correct choice, then proceeded to describe his specific god.

No, he's not intelligent.

He doesn't say he "doesn't know" or "some variant" to "three of them".

The first, that the universe came out of nothing is obscene. This isn't a legitimate theory. He is addressing what previous scholars and philosophers have entertained or hypothesized.
(wait, do you think the universe came out of nothing :O ?)
(He addresses this at minute 2:00)

The second, is as obscene as the first. Self-creation.
(He addresses this at Minute 2:16)

The third, the universe was created by something other than God, or another creation.

If you continued watching you would see he addresses all 4 scenarios, but it sounds like you stopped at 1:53.

Edit: You watched the same video I did and didn't see the above.
I won't be taking much notice of who you consider intelligent or dumb.

Fine with me, who you notice or not notice isn't something that I'll lose sleep over either.

It's just interesting that we all (most?) chuckle when we hear stories of ancient people using the god of the gaps argument to prove the existence of god, but when the same kinds of people use the same arguments today, some people still pay them their respect.

How is this a case of "God of the gaps"?
No one here is saying Dark Matter is God. No one is stretching or reaching. What exactly makes you think this is a case of "God of the Gaps"?
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2015-01-16 20:06:05
Link | Quote | Reply
 
best part of that quote, GoG...

"Nancy Grace? Terrorist. Her AND her plastic surgeon."
[+]
 Bismarck.Ihina
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Ihina
Posts: 3187
By Bismarck.Ihina 2015-01-16 20:07:23
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Blazed1979 said: »
How is this a case of "God of the gaps"?
No one here is saying Dark Matter is God. No one is stretching or reaching. What exactly makes you think this is a case of "God of the Gaps"?

Do you know what the 'god of the gaps' argument is?
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-16 20:13:09
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Asura.Alexandero said: »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh34Xsq7D_A

Here is a good debate that is on the original topic from IntelligenceSquared. Not stating my personal thoughts here because they are irrelevant. See what you guys think.

If you have a laptop beside you, I enjoy watching these while farming for hours on end. Maybe save for later.

=/ sorry dude but those debates are by laymen, not even fluent in Arabic...
There are much bigger dialogues with people who actually representing the mainstream. (pro and vs)

Check Mehdi Hassan's debates, or Dr. Adnan Ibrahime.
 Asura.Alexandero
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: jalexan4
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 20:17:41
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Blazed1979 said: »
Asura.Alexandero said: »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rh34Xsq7D_A

Here is a good debate that is on the original topic from IntelligenceSquared. Not stating my personal thoughts here because they are irrelevant. See what you guys think.

If you have a laptop beside you, I enjoy watching these while farming for hours on end. Maybe save for later.

=/ sorry dude but those debates are by laymen, not even fluent in Arabic...
There are much bigger dialogues with people who actually representing the mainstream. (pro and vs)

Check Mehdi Hassan's debates, or Dr. Adnan Ibrahime.

Ty, I will.
 Asura.Kingnobody
Bug Hunter
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 22:30:47
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Is this potato thread still going on?
[+]
 Odin.Godofgods
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4013
By Odin.Godofgods 2015-01-16 22:54:06
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bloodrose said: »
best part of that quote, GoG...

"Nancy Grace? Terrorist. Her AND her plastic surgeon."

i rly wish i a video of that quote. It works so much better being heard then read.
 Ragnarok.Zeig
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Zeig
Posts: 1773
By Ragnarok.Zeig 2015-01-17 01:51:09
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
How is this a case of "God of the gaps"?
No one here is saying Dark Matter is God. No one is stretching or reaching. What exactly makes you think this is a case of "God of the Gaps"?

Do you know what the 'god of the gaps' argument is?
It's only a fallacy if:
1- it conflicts with seeking knowledge
2- you have a better explanation

In the video (which i havent watched btw, but going by how Blazed summarized it, and im familiar with the Quranic argument and Hamza's rhetoric anyways), Hamza never claimed that humans should stop studying the universe because God. Actually, the Quran explicitly encourages mankind to walk the earth and reflect upon the creation, and seek answers to how creation began.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-17 12:21:47
Link | Quote | Reply
 
slightly off topic, but funny
YouTube Video Placeholder
 Bismarck.Ihina
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Ihina
Posts: 3187
By Bismarck.Ihina 2015-01-17 12:36:31
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Zeig said: »
It's only a fallacy if:
1- it conflicts with seeking knowledge
2- you have a better explanation

I swear to all of the gods, this kind of thing is why I roll my eyes whenever someone claims religion does no harm.
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-17 12:40:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Ragnarok.Zeig said: »
It's only a fallacy if:
1- it conflicts with seeking knowledge
2- you have a better explanation

I swear to all of the gods, this kind of thing is why I roll my eyes whenever someone claims religion does no harm.

I can imagine and see you "rolling" your eyes pretty easily, and I've never seen you in person or met you.
 Bismarck.Ihina
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Ihina
Posts: 3187
By Bismarck.Ihina 2015-01-17 12:47:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Even if we were in the comment section of a youtube video, that was pretty weak.

It's just sad that there's a whole section of humanity raised on religion that believes it's ok to invoke magic powers as long as we don't have a better explanation for something. In a perfect world, that kind of behavior would be limited only to people living prior to the 14th century.
[+]
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-17 12:53:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Blazed1979 said: »
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
Blazed1979 said: »
Bismarck.Ihina said: »
He listed off 4 points, said 'I don't know' (or some variant) to three of them, concluded the 4th one must be the correct choice, then proceeded to describe his specific god.

No, he's not intelligent.

He doesn't say he "doesn't know" or "some variant" to "three of them".

The first, that the universe came out of nothing is obscene. This isn't a legitimate theory. He is addressing what previous scholars and philosophers have entertained or hypothesized.
(wait, do you think the universe came out of nothing :O ?)
(He addresses this at minute 2:00)

The second, is as obscene as the first. Self-creation.
(He addresses this at Minute 2:16)

The third, the universe was created by something other than God, or another creation.

If you continued watching you would see he addresses all 4 scenarios, but it sounds like you stopped at 1:53.

Edit: You watched the same video I did and didn't see the above.
I won't be taking much notice of who you consider intelligent or dumb.

Fine with me, who you notice or not notice isn't something that I'll lose sleep over either.

It's just interesting that we all (most?) chuckle when we hear stories of ancient people using the god of the gaps argument to prove the existence of god, but when the same kinds of people use the same arguments today, some people still pay them their respect.

How is this a case of "God of the gaps"?
No one here is saying Dark Matter is God. No one is stretching or reaching. What exactly makes you think this is a case of "God of the Gaps"?
God of gaps(short):
We don't know, therefore god.
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-18 06:54:15
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quote:
Paris attacks: Jean-Marie Le Pen says French terror attacks were work of Western intelligence

Front National founder gives credence to conspiracy theories in an interview with virulently anti-western Russian newspaper
JOHN LICHFIELD Author Biography PARIS Saturday 17 January 2015
PRINT A A A
The Charlie Hebdo massacre may have been the work of an “intelligence agency”, working with the connivance of French authorities, according to Jean-Marie Le Pen, founder of the far right Front National.

In an interview with a virulently anti-Western Russian newspaper, Mr Le Pen, 86, gave credence to conspiracy theories circulating on the internet suggesting that the attack was the work of American or Israeli agents seeking to foment a civil war between Islam and the West.

His comments – only partially retracted in an interview with the French newspaper Le Monde today – provoked outrage amongst French politicians. They will also infuriate Marine Le Pen, his daughter, and successor as leader of the FN, who has been trying to distance the party from her father’s extreme and provocative remarks.

Mr Le Pen stood down as FN leader three years ago but remains President-for-life. He made the comments in an interview with Komsomolskaïa Pravda , a newspaper which had already blamed the United States for the terrorist mayhem in France.

Charlie Hebdo: Mourning in Paris
1 of 6
Mourning in Paris
Next
Mourning in ParisMourning in ParisMourning in ParisMourning in ParisMourning in ParisMourning in Paris

“The shooting at Charlie Hebdo resembles a secret service operation but we have no proof of that,” the newspaper quoted Mr Le Pen as saying. “I don’t think it was organised by the French authorities but they permitted this crime to be committed. That, for the moment, is just a supposition.”

To justify his comments, Mr Le Pen pointed to the fact that one of the Kouachi brothers, who carried out the Charlie Hebdo massacre, left his identity card in a crashed getaway car. He compared this to the “miraculous fact” – beloved by conspiracy theorists – that one of the passports of the 9/11 hijackers was found on the ground in New York after two planes collided with the twin towers of the World Trade Centre in 2001.

READ MORE: SUSPECTED TERRORISTS SHOT DEAD IN BELGIUM
A CONTINENT ON THE EDGE - TERROR RAIDS ACROSS EUROPE
CAMERON AND OBAMA VOW JOINT ANTI-TERROR MEASURES

Mr Le Pen made two other provocative remarks in the interview. He said that the 1,500,000 who marched “against hatred” in Paris last Sunday were not “Charlies” but “Charlie Chaplins” (ie clowns). He also said that there were 15,000,00 to 20,000,000 Muslims in France – three or four times the generally accepted figures of 5,000,000 people who are practising Muslims or have Muslim backgrounds.

In an interview with Le Monde today, Mr Le Pen repeated his suspicions about the identity card but said he “could not recall” talking about “secret services” to the Russian newspaper.

Mr Le Pen’s original quoted remarks run directly counter to the official line of his daughter and his party. They have suggested that the attacks on Charlie Hebdo and a Jewish supermarket are the final proof that France faces an “enemy within”, which has been created by immigration and open EU borders.

Conspiracy theories of the kind espoused by the elder Le Pen sprang up on the internet within hours of the Charlie Hebdo attacks. They have been repeated in recent days by some – not all - young Muslims in France, torn between identifying with the Kouachi brothers and insisting that they were stooges of the French authorities, Washington and Israel.

The French “pope of conspiracy theories”, Thierry Meyssan, now based in Damascus, insisted that the Charlie Hebdo massacres were “ordered by US neo-cons and liberal hawks”. An American conspiracy site, McLatchy, has claimed that the Kouachi brothers were working for French intelligence.



Source: http://www.independent.co.uk
Offline
Posts: 4028
By Blazed1979 2015-01-18 06:58:32
Link | Quote | Reply
 
YouTube Video Placeholder




YouTube Video Placeholder
[+]
 Valefor.Sehachan
Guide Maker
Offline
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
user: Seha
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-18 07:17:54
Link | Quote | Reply
 
What Le Pen said there is pure speculation. It's said in the same article he actually doesn't know, so he's just theory guessing as much as any other average person. Don't see a point in quoting that interview.
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3692
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-01-18 07:20:42
Link | Quote | Reply
 
[+]
 Cerberus.Senkyuutai
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Yuffy
Posts: 4415
By Cerberus.Senkyuutai 2015-01-18 07:21:42
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I don't care about the whole plot ***but I'm glad I could see the part of the video when he gets "shot".

From what I can see, didn't he get shot in the neck or shoulder? It looks like his clothes are slightly moving.
Offline
Posts: 595
By charlo999 2015-01-18 14:04:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Senkyuutai said: »
I don't care about the whole plot ***but I'm glad I could see the part of the video when he gets "shot".

From what I can see, didn't he get shot in the neck or shoulder? It looks like his clothes are slightly moving.

They say he was shot in the head.
So, bullet impact signs on the ground next to his head. And absolutely no signs of blood anywhere, from a point blank ranged shot with a AK47.
And you say it doesn't seem like that because his clothes ruffle?
Obviously the hardline, government knows best/are always right posters are gonna dismiss this because it was brought to us through YouTube(just another media outlet) Even though it shows realtime footage.(and facts like a lot of said YouTube media does)
Bet the Germans thought the same thing when hitter used propaganda to rise to power, and that the Americans thought, before the secret documents were realesed about the propaganda ops in Cuba.
[+]
Offline
Posts: 13787
By Bloodrose 2015-01-18 14:19:05
Link | Quote | Reply
 
You're confusing Media Outlet, with Media Device.

Youtube is not the same as NBC, CNBC, FOX, or other news and media outlets.

They don't proselytize news. Often, it's individuals who post, or repost, ***, video games, music, or other things that were already posted by a true media outlet - regardless of whether those outlets actually got their facts straight.
First Page 2 3 ... 15 16 17 ... 23 24 25