|
Are All Terrorists Muslims? It’s Not Even Close
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2015-01-16 14:43:49
The Japanese Emperor existed within our lifetime, we have pictures of him and claimed to be a descendant of the Gods. Amaterasu in particular.
Should I believe that Amaterasu exists because Hirohito did? No, because thats HELP I AM TRAPPED IN 2006 PLEASE SEND A TIME MACHINE.
Jesus in the historicity doesn't prove he raised anyone from the dead or performed any miracles. He could have been the same preacher talked about in the Bible without the magic killed by the Empire for being a thorn in their side.
[+]
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 33979
By Bismarck.Dracondria 2015-01-16 14:44:27
All terrorists are Sehas!
[+]
By Bloodrose 2015-01-16 14:44:39
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles. There is no verifiable proof that "Jesus Christ", as is said in the bible, written hundreds of years after his death, was real. There is, however, evidence that "Jesus Christ", was based off of a real person named Jeshua bon Joseph.
[+]
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2015-01-16 14:45:32
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals.
God is a primal? It all makes sense now.
[+]
Cerberus.Anjisnu
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2803
By Cerberus.Anjisnu 2015-01-16 14:45:47
Oh 9 pages I can go full potato now neat!
[+]
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:46:45
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles. Nobody is denying that Jesus (the man) existed. But his miracles are in question.
I could write a book about you as a person who flew on unicorns all around the world in a different universe. You would argue that those events happened because the book wrote about a real person (you), even though it is impossible for you do preform anything written in that book (so-called miracles). The bible stated it, many journalist stated that Jesus + Miracles were often the talk. If multiple people told the cops that someone killed another someone, the cops may not be able to prove it but they would definitely investigate. I have heard enough talk about Jesus+ miracles + His claims of being God to do some investigating. Theres not gonna be a picture, a video or anything of the like. It will come down to faith but my faith is based off of collective knowledge and I'm swayed to believe His claims were true. For me not to believe Jesus is the son of God is tantamount that OJ wasn't the killer.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:46:55
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles. Nobody is denying that Jesus (the man) existed. But his miracles are in question.
I could write a book about you as a person who flew on unicorns all around the world in a different universe. You would argue that those events happened because the book wrote about a real person (you), even though it is impossible for you do preform anything written in that book (so-called miracles). Ok, if thats the case then I agree. People can question the miracles because they break with the laws of physics. I believe that they did occur because there were multiple, independent sources that all described the same occurrences. We've also found later books, Book of St. Thomas, Book of Mary Magdelene, etc... that also, in turn, described those same occurrences. I find it highly unlikely that people that spanned over that frame of time were able to concoct all the same stories independently and congruently. Is it possible? Yep. Is it probable? No more than the miracles themselves. Could I be wrong? Sure. Could you be wrong? Yep. Just have to do the research and decide.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:46:56
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals. God wouldn't exist without mortals to create him. In other words, it isn't that a creator made man, it is that man made a creator.
Religion defines the illusion that a creator is responsible for any and all happenings in this world, which is a crutch from knowing how things really work in the world. Placing blame on an event instead of an action is man's greatest crutch in life.
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:48:38
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles. There is no verifiable proof that "Jesus Christ", as is said in the bible, written hundreds of years after his death, was real. There is, however, evidence that "Jesus Christ", was based off of a real person named Jeshua bon Joseph. Look up a historian named Josephus who wrote about Jesus tho he wasnt a believer.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:48:49
Also what about all the people who never even *** heard of god they get a mulligan or just *** from birth? The bible says that people know that God exist because creation is proof of Himself. It's a debated subject among christians of what happens to those who have never heard of Jesus. I personal believe God grades on the curve as He seems to have done in the old testament. The only problem with that is that man isn't mostly Good fighting the small urge to not be bad but inherently bad fighting to do good. So the necessity of the Gospel to be preached is vital. Why do you use the bible for reference?
You know that the bible is written by man, not by God. If God is so great, why not use him as a primary source instead of a secondary source like the bible? Because God has chosen to reveal Himself in Christ and Christ is vividly expressed in the scriptures. Again, you are taking second-handed information and presenting it as fact.
Jesus claimed (either himself, which is highly unlikely, or by a third person, which is very likely) to be the son of God. You know what happens to people who claim to be the son of God? They get rounded up and sent to the funny farm.
What the Christian Bible did was take a figure from history who was martyred by the Roman Empire for crimes against the state and created a religion around him. How much of the Christian Jesus is true is hard to say, but his "miraculous works" is fiction, along with his supposed method of being born. He verified His claims as the Son of God by the miracles that followed His ministry. Miracles defined by a book to define that book?
Do you believe that Harry Potter is real? He preformed what normal people would consider to be miracles. His miracles are defined by a book. The book defines the character. So, is Harry Potter real?
If you say no, then what separates Harry Potter from Jesus?
If you say yes, then you have no basis in reality. No. Because there is proof outside of the bible the proves that the man Jesus did exist and there was much said about Him in association with miracles. There is no verifiable proof that "Jesus Christ", as is said in the bible, written hundreds of years after his death, was real. There is, however, evidence that "Jesus Christ", was based off of a real person named Jeshua bon Joseph.
This is wrong as well. You guys really need to do some more research on this. The gospels are dated to within a decade of Christs death.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:49:09
How come that's your only answer you can provide?
"The bible said so, so it must be real!"
Again, if a book said so, then do you believe that Harry Potter is real?
Answer that.
By Ramyrez 2015-01-16 14:49:24
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »killed by the Empire for being a thorn in their side.
I get it!
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:50:04
Come on King. We've been through this. If he actually exists, then he would exists regardless of religion, or our beliefs, or w/e. If God really exists and humans never did, he wouldn't cease to exist. He is either there or he isn't and it doesn't matter if we think he is or isnt.
If we go by your way of thinking. If god exist, something created it, if something created it, something created what created it and so on infinitely. So which god do you want to believe in?
Wrong. If something exists outside of the space-time continuum, which is where God would have to exist to create the Big Bang (This is where time began - There was no time before hand), then it needs no creator. Unless you exist within our space and time, you have no need for a beginning and end. It's comparing the beginning and end of a straight line and a circle.
So god over the afternoon finally quit the 5th dimension to reach his final form? Why have you assumed he started in the 5th dimension?
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:51:19
The bible stated it, many journalist stated that Jesus + Miracles were often the talk. If multiple people told the cops that someone killed another someone, the cops may not be able to prove it but they would definitely investigate. I have heard enough talk about Jesus+ miracles + His claims of being God to do some investigating. Theres not gonna be a picture, a video or anything of the like. It will come down to faith but my faith is based off of collective knowledge and I'm swayed to believe His claims were true. For me not to believe Jesus is the son of God is tantamount that OJ wasn't the killer. Those journalists used the Bible as basis for their argument. Everyone who claimed that Jesus preformed these miracles would use the bible (the bible said so, so it must be true) as their argument.
Just because a book said so doesn't automatically make it true!
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:51:46
How come that's your only answer you can provide?
"The bible said so, so it must be real!"
Again, if a book said so, then do you believe that Harry Potter is real?
Answer that. The bible also claims the the earth is a Sphere and that it spins on its own axis and dangles from nothing. The book of Job. Long before we knew it wasnt flat and that it truely did spin on its own axis and that it dangled from nothing.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:51:56
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals. God wouldn't exist without mortals to create him. In other words, it isn't that a creator made man, it is that man made a creator.
Religion defines the illusion that a creator is responsible for any and all happenings in this world, which is a crutch from knowing how things really work in the world. Placing blame on an event instead of an action is man's greatest crutch in life.
You're failing to understand the argument from a presupposed premise. The only reason you think he can't exist without man, is that you've first decided man created him. You're stuck in a circular argument.
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:52:51
The bible stated it, many journalist stated that Jesus + Miracles were often the talk. If multiple people told the cops that someone killed another someone, the cops may not be able to prove it but they would definitely investigate. I have heard enough talk about Jesus+ miracles + His claims of being God to do some investigating. Theres not gonna be a picture, a video or anything of the like. It will come down to faith but my faith is based off of collective knowledge and I'm swayed to believe His claims were true. For me not to believe Jesus is the son of God is tantamount that OJ wasn't the killer. Those journalists used the Bible as basis for their argument. Everyone who claimed that Jesus preformed these miracles would use the bible (the bible said so, so it must be true) as their argument.
Just because a book said so doesn't automatically make it true! The journalist were either atheist or other.
By ScaevolaBahamut 2015-01-16 14:54:33
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals. God wouldn't exist without mortals to create him.
And again, you're begging the question. You are arguing from your conclusion. It's not helpful.
Your point was that all religions have a creator that springs from the mind of man. I am aware of no religion that actually says this. All of the religions out there that suppose God exists independently of mortals may be wrong, but you aren't offering anything here to support that conclusion.
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:54:41
How come that's your only answer you can provide?
"The bible said so, so it must be real!"
Again, if a book said so, then do you believe that Harry Potter is real?
Answer that. The bible also claims the the earth is a Sphere and that it spins on its own axis and dangles from nothing. The book of Job. Long before we knew it wasnt flat and that it truely did spin on its own axis and that it dangled from nothing. That's quite the scientific discovery for a 3500 year old book. (Job is believed to be the oldest book in the bible. The bible is broken up in other books within itself if anyone was unaware of this.)
By Bloodrose 2015-01-16 14:55:11
You can strongly disagree that ground morals are inherent, even in the face of over overwhelming evidence to the contrary all you like.
If, in fact morals such as killing people is wrong - why are there so many people who do it without remorse? Remorse comes from a feeling of empathy - understanding the other person.
It's learned behavior. Morals are subjective, and you don't learn about what morals you have, until you see the effects around you. You would have to have a conscious awareness of the world at large, at the time of your birth, to even contemplate such things, yet the world at the fingertips of an infant is extremely limited.
The concept of the "human heart", in this context that you are personally trying to pitch, is a man-made concept as well, and is often only used to equate one's idea of humanity to another person's view.
There are children who grow up believing that lying is good, and feel good doing so.
More still that believe they are better than others, simply by virtue of birth, and use it as a means to step all over others.
Yet, by your logic, because that is what they inherently believe from birth, that they can do no wrong. (that's the logic, not what you actually said)
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:56:08
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals. God wouldn't exist without mortals to create him. In other words, it isn't that a creator made man, it is that man made a creator.
Religion defines the illusion that a creator is responsible for any and all happenings in this world, which is a crutch from knowing how things really work in the world. Placing blame on an event instead of an action is man's greatest crutch in life.
You're failing to understand the argument from a presupposed premise. The only reason you think he can't exist without man, is that you've first decided man created him. You're stuck in a circular argument. You are under the assumption that God existed prior to man. You also claim that God created man. How can a mythical being create something so flawed as man?
You can use the bible all you want, but there is evidence to point out that God did not exist prior to man. There is also evidence to point out that God did not create man (evolution) and that man, in his wisdom, created God to control the masses (historical context).
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:56:14
Come on King. We've been through this. If he actually exists, then he would exists regardless of religion, or our beliefs, or w/e. If God really exists and humans never did, he wouldn't cease to exist. He is either there or he isn't and it doesn't matter if we think he is or isnt.
If we go by your way of thinking. If god exist, something created it, if something created it, something created what created it and so on infinitely. So which god do you want to believe in?
Wrong. If something exists outside of the space-time continuum, which is where God would have to exist to create the Big Bang (This is where time began - There was no time before hand), then it needs no creator. Unless you exist within our space and time, you have no need for a beginning and end. It's comparing the beginning and end of a straight line and a circle.
So god over the afternoon finally quit the 5th dimension to reach his final form? Why have you assumed he started in the 5th dimension?
Why do you assume nothing created God? You said it yourself, if it exist something created it.
 No, that isn't what I said. I said if something exists within our space time continuum then something created it. This doesn't and wouldnt apply to something existing outside of our space-time continuum. If there is no time, then there is no beginning, thus, you don't need a creator. infinite regression only works when time is present.
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2015-01-16 14:57:02
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals. God wouldn't exist without mortals to create him. In other words, it isn't that a creator made man, it is that man made a creator.
Religion defines the illusion that a creator is responsible for any and all happenings in this world, which is a crutch from knowing how things really work in the world. Placing blame on an event instead of an action is man's greatest crutch in life.
You're failing to understand the argument from a presupposed premise. The only reason you think he can't exist without man, is that you've first decided man created him. You're stuck in a circular argument.
The argument typically in play isn't "does god exist?" but "does god XYZ exist?" and the latter is far easier to attack due to the inconsistencies of the source material (holy books) presented as definitive evidence.
Most atheists aren't going to touch the deist argument because few deists are out and about causing trouble or claiming their God has a stake in humanity. They're busy I dunno... living their lives without evangelizing.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 200
By Asura.Alexandero 2015-01-16 14:57:54
Quote: Apparently you fail to notice the one thing common in every religion there is: A creator is born from the mind of a man.
If religion never existed, there would be no concept of God, and without a concept of God, he would cease being God and will be known as an unknown. Since the unknown cannot be known without evidence of existence, the being formally known as God would not exist because by definition of the (now nonexistent religious text) concept of God requires a defined existence which never existed.
Ok, I have to stick up for Alexandero here and say you're begging the question in a real and serious way; saying God wouldn't exist without mortals to worship it is just starting from the premise that God is a work of fiction, unless you're relying on some silly D&D/Gaiman cosmology where the gods rely on human worship for power.
Plenty, if not all religions suppose divine forces that exist without the consent of mortals, and some (Sikhism is awesome about this) are explicit that God is indifferent to mortal worship; the worship is for the benefit of the mortals. God wouldn't exist without mortals to create him. In other words, it isn't that a creator made man, it is that man made a creator.
Religion defines the illusion that a creator is responsible for any and all happenings in this world, which is a crutch from knowing how things really work in the world. Placing blame on an event instead of an action is man's greatest crutch in life.
You're failing to understand the argument from a presupposed premise. The only reason you think he can't exist without man, is that you've first decided man created him. You're stuck in a circular argument. You are under the assumption that God existed prior to man. You also claim that God created man. How can a mythical being create something so flawed as man?
You can use the bible all you want, but there is evidence to point out that God did not exist prior to man. There is also evidence to point out that God did not create man (evolution) and that man, in his wisdom, created God to control the masses (historical context). Lol, I give up.
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:57:55
You can strongly disagree that ground morals are inherent, even in the face of over overwhelming evidence to the contrary all you like.
If, in fact morals such as killing people is wrong - why are there so many people who do it without remorse? Remorse comes from a feeling of empathy - understanding the other person.
It's learned behavior. Morals are subjective, and you don't learn about what morals you have, until you see the effects around you. You would have to have a conscious awareness of the world at large, at the time of your birth, to even contemplate such things, yet the world at the fingertips of an infant is extremely limited.
The concept of the "human heart", in this context that you are personally trying to pitch, is a man-made concept as well, and is often only used to equate one's idea of humanity to another person's view.
There are children who grow up believing that lying is good, and feel good doing so.
More still that believe they are better than others, simply by virtue of birth, and use it as a means to step all over others.
Yet, by your logic, because that is what they inherently believe from birth, that they can do no wrong. (that's the logic, not what you actually said) I answered your first question in my original statement seared conscience. If you do wrong enough eventually conviction, guilt, remorse, it dissipates and is gone. Cartel hitmen were hitmen at 5 years old. It was a slow fade into the abyss.
Valefor.Sehachan
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-01-16 14:58:11
I can accept someone believing in a sort of demiurge or even different dimensions, as long as they accept it's merely hypothetical and there's nothing to be adamant about. It's a possibility about something you don't know. It's fine I think.
But when someone takes the bible literally I lose any intellectual respect for them. It just means you can't even think. You're beyond any kind of help.
Then you have far too many people making a man-like god, which to me is just even a more obvious fallacy. Why should a deity look like humans? If it has a higher form of evolution it should have at the very least wings, jet propellers and laser beams. What god wouldn't want lasers?
But back to serious..if you wanna believe in a god I don't understand why you try to project humanity into it. That's just ego talking. Humans are egomaniacs and racist in a sense as they believe to be the ultimate form of existence.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-01-16 14:58:40
How come that's your only answer you can provide?
"The bible said so, so it must be real!"
Again, if a book said so, then do you believe that Harry Potter is real?
Answer that. The bible also claims the the earth is a Sphere and that it spins on its own axis and dangles from nothing. The book of Job. Long before we knew it wasnt flat and that it truely did spin on its own axis and that it dangled from nothing. That's quite the scientific discovery for a 3500 year old book. (Job is believed to be the oldest book in the bible. The bible is broken up in other books within itself if anyone was unaware of this.) Quoting yourself to agree with yourself isn't helping matters any.
Instead, it begs to question if Blazeoffury and Alexandero are two different people....
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 196
By Odin.Blazeoffury 2015-01-16 14:59:12
YouTube Video Placeholder
Evolution is still a theory.
Quote: What percentage of terror attacks in the United States and Europe are committed by Muslims? Guess. Nope. Guess again. And again...
“Not all Muslims are terrorists, but all terrorists are Muslims.” How many times have you heard that one? Sure, we heard Fox News’s Brian Kilmeade say it, but to me, that was simply part of the Fox News plan to make their viewers dumber, as we saw again this past weekend when its terrorism “expert” Steve Emerson was caught fabricating the story that Birmingham, England, is closed to non-Muslims. But more alarmingly, even some reasonable people have uttered this statement.
And that comment is often followed up by the question: Why don’t we see Christian, Buddhist, or Jewish terrorists?
Obviously, there are people who sincerely view themselves as Muslims who have committed horrible acts in the name of Islam. We Muslims can make the case that their actions are not based on any part of the faith but on their own political agenda. But they are Muslims, no denying that.
However, and this will probably shock many, so you might want to take a breath: Overwhelmingly, those who have committed terrorist attacks in the United States and Europe aren’t Muslims. Let’s give that a moment to sink in.
Now, it’s not your fault if you aren’t aware of that fact. You can blame the media. (Yes, Sarah Palin and I actually agree on one thing: The mainstream media sucks.)
So here are some statistics for those interested. Let’s start with Europe. Want to guess what percent of the terrorist attacks there were committed by Muslims over the past five years? Wrong. That is, unless you said less than 2 percent.
As Europol, the European Union’s law-enforcement agency, noted in its report released last year, the vast majority of terror attacks in Europe were perpetrated by separatist groups. For example, in 2013, there were 152 terror attacks in Europe. Only two of them were “religiously motivated,” while 84 were predicated upon ethno-nationalist or separatist beliefs.
Or what about the (dare I mention them) Jewish terrorists? Per the 2013 State Department’s report on terrorism, there were 399 acts of terror committed by Israeli settlers.
We are talking about groups like France’s FLNC, which advocates an independent nation for the island of Corsica. In December 2013, FLNC terrorists carried out simultaneous rocket attacks against police stations in two French cities. And in Greece in late 2013, the left-wing Militant Popular Revolutionary Forces shot and killed two members of the right-wing political party Golden Dawn. While over in Italy, the anarchist group FAI engaged in numerous terror attacks including sending a bomb to a journalist. And the list goes on and on.
Have you heard of these incidents? Probably not. But if Muslims had committed them do you think you our media would’ve covered it? No need to answer, that’s a rhetorical question.
Even after one of the worst terror attacks ever in Europe in 2011, when Anders Breivik slaughtered 77 people in Norway to further his anti-Muslim, anti-immigrant, and pro-“Christian Europe” agenda as he stated in his manifesto, how much press did we see in the United States? Yes, it was covered, but not the way we see when a Muslim terrorist is involved. Plus we didn’t see terrorism experts fill the cable news sphere asking how we can stop future Christian terrorists. In fact, even the suggestion that Breivik was a “Christian terrorist” was met with outrage by many, including Fox News’s Bill O’Reilly.
Have you heard about the Buddhist terrorists? Well, extremist Buddhists have killed many Muslim civilians in Burma, and just a few months ago in Sri Lanka, some went on a violent rampage burning down Muslim homes and businesses and slaughtering four Muslims.
Or what about the (dare I mention them) Jewish terrorists? Per the 2013 State Department’s report on terrorism, there were 399 acts of terror committed by Israeli settlers in what are known as “price tag” attacks. These Jewish terrorists attacked Palestinian civilians causing physical injuries to 93 of them and also vandalized scores of mosques and Christian churches.
Back in the United States, the percentage of terror attacks committed by Muslims is almost as miniscule as in Europe. An FBI study looking at terrorism committed on U.S. soil between 1980 and 2005 found that 94 percent of the terror attacks were committed by non-Muslims. In actuality, 42 percent of terror attacks were carried out by Latino-related groups, followed by 24 percent perpetrated by extreme left-wing actors.
And as a 2014 study by University of North Carolina found, since the 9/11 attacks, Muslim-linked terrorism has claimed the lives of 37 Americans. In that same time period, more than 190,000 Americans were murdered (PDF).
In fact in 2013, it was actually more likely Americans would be killed by a toddler than a terrorist. In that year, three Americans were killed in the Boston Marathon bombing. How many people did toddlers kill in 2013? Five, all by accidentally shooting a gun.
But our media simply do not cover the non-Muslim terror attacks with same gusto. Why? It’s a business decision. Stories about scary “others” play better. It’s a story that can simply be framed as good versus evil with Americans being the good guy and the brown Muslim as the bad.
Honestly, when is the last time we heard the media refer to those who attack abortion clinics as “Christian terrorists,” even though these attacks occur at one of every five reproductive health-care facilities? That doesn’t sell as well. After all we are a so-called Christian nation, so that would require us to look at the enemy within our country, and that makes many uncomfortable. Or worse, it makes them change the channel.
That’s the same reason we don’t see many stories about how to reduce the 30 Americans killed each day by gun violence or the three women per day killed by domestic violence. But the media will have on expert after expert discussing how can we stop these scary brown Muslims from killing any more Americans despite the fact you actually have a better chance of being killed by a refrigerator falling on you.
Look, this article is not going to change the media’s business model. But what I hope it does is cause some to realize that not all terrorists are Muslims. In fact, they are actually a very small percent of those that are. Now, I’m not saying to ignore the dangers posed by Islamic radicals. I’m just saying look out for those refrigerators.
Source
|
|