Boost In Damage To Useless Weaponskills.

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
Version 3.1
New Items
users online
Forum » FFXI » General » Boost in damage to useless weaponskills.
Boost in damage to useless weaponskills.
First Page 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
 Cerberus.Conagh
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: onagh
Posts: 3189
By Cerberus.Conagh 2014-06-12 15:49:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I see sanguine blade is on the list, I wasn't aware this 3k+ WS was weak as such.

A full cure ws being made more potent that deals 3~4k damage being increased further seems like a fun idea, it's also going to interesting to see if the resist rate nms have to the magic ws's is lowered as a result of higher potency / magic acc.

This may become the new go to WS for BLU on all content.
 Cerberus.Conagh
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: onagh
Posts: 3189
By Cerberus.Conagh 2014-06-12 15:57:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Syagin said: »
Hey now lets be clear... some weaponskills are clearly going to benifit but cyclone? Too many intellegent people here for me to have to draw you a picture to get what i'm saying.

I'm sorry Cyclone will benefit here!

Yorcia and your SCH sucks send in the thief for Cyclone wind dmg ws! (lol I know but still)
Offline
Posts: 1337
By Wordspoken 2014-06-12 16:11:30
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Am I the only cynic, who asks why? Seems like all this update does, is make us use ws B, instead of ws A. Did we need change because of change?

Don't get me wrong, our current dev team is doing amazing stuff for the game atm (except job points), which is exactly why I'd rather see them work on actual issues in the game.
Offline
Posts: 1273
By FaeQueenCory 2014-06-12 16:13:28
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Asura.Ackeronll said: »
Wondering about TP costs tbh. Some of these say 1000 TP meaning old 100 TP. Why would they mention them having a boost at the base amount to use them.
Didn't see anyone answer you, but I'm fairly confident that those notes are what we, the community, have been calling the "fTP mod" that for many weaponskills changed depending on the scale of TP%.
(Some have large jumps like 1.0 @100%{1000} and 1.64 @200%{2000}; others, like the EmpyWSs have a 3.0 fTP across the %s.)

Also: anyone else a little disappointed that there was no Spirits Within change?
It'd be nice to get decent damage with it... Especially cause it has actual potential to be legit useful...
Cause let's face facts: shitty stat mods aren't the reason we use only the quest, merit, and REM WSs...
It's because those WSs are two steps into Light and Dark skillchains... And in the case of Relic and Empy WSs, a third step into "double Light/Darkness".
So unless these low level WSs now are aligned to half a Light or Darkness SC... Or have some unique utility (eg Spirits Within)... They aren't gonna be replacing anyone's macros anytime soon. IMO, anyways.
 Bismarck.Inference
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Inference
Posts: 417
By Bismarck.Inference 2014-06-12 16:18:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Wordspoken said: »
Am I the only cynic, who asks why? Seems like all this update does, is make us use ws B, instead of ws A. Did we need change because of change?

Well, I like the idea of merited WS having potential contenders when Emperyean WS were not a viable alternative (i.e Wildfire compared to Last Stand is obviously stupid, and Fudo only works well under certain conditions compared to Shoha), considering they are not giving us an upgrade to the amount of merit WS we can have. I don't think the list had to be so extensive as to give us upgrades to Wasp Sting and Fast Blade, but I doubt that took up much of their time anyways.
 Fenrir.Mefuki
Offline
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Mefuki
Posts: 157
By Fenrir.Mefuki 2014-06-12 16:37:56
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Wordspoken said: »
Am I the only cynic, who asks why? Seems like all this update does, is make us use ws B, instead of ws A. Did we need change because of change?

Don't get me wrong, our current dev team is doing amazing stuff for the game atm (except job points), which is exactly why I'd rather see them work on actual issues in the game.


Well, the issue SE is trying to address here is making more WS viable so that way, to quote SE: "the weapon skills obtainable at lower levels should become as enticing for players to use as their high-level counterparts, thus allowing for a more diverse arsenal depending on the situation."

Naturally, there'll always be a WS that you usually use the most but they want to make it so we're not just using that one WS ALL the time for everything, so there are some situations where you'd pick others depending on your opponent and physical/magical defences, additional effects, etc.
 Cerberus.Conagh
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: onagh
Posts: 3189
By Cerberus.Conagh 2014-06-12 17:15:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Fenrir.Mefuki said: »
Wordspoken said: »
Am I the only cynic, who asks why? Seems like all this update does, is make us use ws B, instead of ws A. Did we need change because of change?

Don't get me wrong, our current dev team is doing amazing stuff for the game atm (except job points), which is exactly why I'd rather see them work on actual issues in the game.


Well, the issue SE is trying to address here is making more WS viable so that way, to quote SE: "the weapon skills obtainable at lower levels should become as enticing for players to use as their high-level counterparts, thus allowing for a more diverse arsenal depending on the situation."

Naturally, there'll always be a WS that you usually use the most but they want to make it so we're not just using that one WS ALL the time for everything, so there are some situations where you'd pick others depending on your opponent and physical/magical defences, additional effects, etc.

People who are using many jobs but are locked on Say Tachi: Shoha will now notice Fudo is arguably alot stronger and probably a better choice than Shoha (Even when attack capped if my math is right but needs proper testing). Its more for the fact We can't max every merit ws and this provides options that allow us to not merit some.
 Sylph.Tigerwoods
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Vegetto
Posts: 15066
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2014-06-12 17:50:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Wakmidget said: »
So, which WS's you think they are gonna *** up the calculations on and have them doing 15-20k damage 1st day of the update, forcing an emergency maintenance? lol
Sneak attack working from the front like back at 75 cap
[+]
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2014-06-12 17:55:36
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | Quote | Reply
 
Post deleted by User.
 Sylph.Ice
Offline
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
user: Ice
Posts: 309
By Sylph.Ice 2014-06-12 18:26:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Sylph.Tigerwoods said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Wakmidget said: »
So, which WS's you think they are gonna *** up the calculations on and have them doing 15-20k damage 1st day of the update, forcing an emergency maintenance? lol
Sneak attack working from the front like back at 75 cap


BULLY ALL 'DA THANGZ
 Asura.Ccl
Offline
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
user: ccl
Posts: 1998
By Asura.Ccl 2014-06-12 18:30:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Conagh said: »
]

People who are using many jobs but are locked on Say Tachi: Shoha will now notice Fudo is arguably alot stronger and probably a better choice than Shoha (Even when attack capped if my math is right but needs proper testing). Its more for the fact We can't max every merit ws and this provides options that allow us to not merit some.

I don't think it's possible to know/math till we know how they changed http://ftp.
 Phoenix.Baelorn
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
user: Baelorn
Posts: 857
By Phoenix.Baelorn 2014-06-12 18:36:11
Link | Quote | Reply
 
The update is June 16th. Saw someone ask earlier and didn't see an answer.

http://www.playonline.com/ff11us/polnews/news23289.shtml
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2014-06-12 18:42:58
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Odin.Jassik said: »
Did they not boost Macc on Ageha? /flipdesk

It's the same as Tourb and a few others. It's not MA vs ME but proc rate. The additional effect has a floored proc rate (Kaiser sword vs IT++ as an example) and thus won't even get to the MA/ME check for duration.

*note, I think it was the Kaiser sword that had additional effect: Curse which would rarely proc.
 Quetzalcoatl.Valli
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
user: valli
Posts: 1420
By Quetzalcoatl.Valli 2014-06-12 18:52:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Snprphnx said: »
Shiva.Eightball said: »
Bismarck.Snprphnx said: »
Shiva.Siviard said: »
I'm really interested to see how Wildfire would perform with 119 Annihilator or Lionsquall.

On the Tier 4 ram in Drifts, my set, using chatoyant staff I get 3500+, with few resists

Can you list your WF set for that?
I tried a makeshift WF set for Diff AA EV and only got like 500.

ItemSet 324796

My set is better than this and I could only get 2300 max on cherti, what witchcraft did you use to get that high.
 Carbuncle.Xenhas
Offline
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: Xenhas
Posts: 664
By Carbuncle.Xenhas 2014-06-12 18:56:21
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Did they not boost Macc on Ageha? /flipdesk

It's the same as Tourb and a few others. It's not MA vs ME but proc rate. The additional effect has a floored proc rate (Kaiser sword vs IT++ as an example) and thus won't even get to the MA/ME check for duration.

*note, I think it was the Kaiser sword that had additional effect: Curse which would rarely proc.


The floored proc rate is due to a m.acc issue with the WS and spells. It became more apparent once GK had tons of m.acc on them. It is still an issue that needs to be addressed.
 Bismarck.Inference
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Inference
Posts: 417
By Bismarck.Inference 2014-06-12 18:57:34
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »
My set is better than this and I could only get 2300 max on cherti, what witchcraft did you use to get that high.

Curious what swaps are substantially "better", looks pretty solid to me. I use about the same and get about the same results as him. Maybe its a Bismarck thing.
 Odin.Jassik
VIP
Offline
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
user: Jassik
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2014-06-12 19:01:06
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Carbuncle.Xenhas said: »
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Did they not boost Macc on Ageha? /flipdesk

It's the same as Tourb and a few others. It's not MA vs ME but proc rate. The additional effect has a floored proc rate (Kaiser sword vs IT++ as an example) and thus won't even get to the MA/ME check for duration.

*note, I think it was the Kaiser sword that had additional effect: Curse which would rarely proc.


The floored proc rate is due to a m.acc issue with the WS and spells. It became more apparent once GK had tons of m.acc on them. It is still an issue that needs to be addressed.

Something is/was broken with regards to added effects, look at the land rate of violent flourish.

Also, I could care less whether it's a magic accuracy or proc rate issue, Ageha used to work, and I want it to work again.
 Quetzalcoatl.Valli
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
user: valli
Posts: 1420
By Quetzalcoatl.Valli 2014-06-12 19:03:06
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bismarck.Inference said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »
My set is better than this and I could only get 2300 max on cherti, what witchcraft did you use to get that high.

Curious what swaps are substantially "better", looks pretty solid to me. I use about the same and get about the same results as him. Maybe its a Bismarck thing.

Didn't say substantially better, just, better. Umbani Cap for one, the new sparks ring with MAB for 2, Augmented Demon ring for 3, Vanir knife 4.

Unless you were getting storm, and then the obi would've been better than aquiline anyway.
 Fairy.Ghaleon
Offline
Server: Fairy
Game: FFXI
user: MisterRyu
Posts: 2742
By Fairy.Ghaleon 2014-06-12 19:04:57
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I knew I shoulda made a thread topic about this last night when they posted it. This op should be ashamed lol.

This is the reason why we can't have nice things. nobody posts on AH :(


so excite for these changes :Q
 Ragnarok.Afania
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Afania
By Ragnarok.Afania 2014-06-12 19:27:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Wordspoken said: »
Am I the only cynic, who asks why? Seems like all this update does, is make us use ws B, instead of ws A. Did we need change because of change?

Don't get me wrong, our current dev team is doing amazing stuff for the game atm (except job points), which is exactly why I'd rather see them work on actual issues in the game.


Certain merit WS has additional effect, that makes them still worth using depending on situation. As for elemental WS, certain mob resists certain element so different elemental WS is still worth using depending on mobs.
 Cerberus.Doctorugh
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Doctorugh
Posts: 317
By Cerberus.Doctorugh 2014-06-12 19:28:47
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Conagh said: »
I see sanguine blade is on the list, I wasn't aware this 3k+ WS was weak as such.

A full cure ws being made more potent that deals 3~4k damage being increased further seems like a fun idea, it's also going to interesting to see if the resist rate nms have to the magic ws's is lowered as a result of higher potency / magic acc.

This may become the new go to WS for BLU on all content.

Pipe down! If they know this, they will nerf it. Keep this within the small circle of BLUs that know how to play the game (you can just PM them all, as there are only 3-4 on our server).
[+]
 Bismarck.Inference
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Inference
Posts: 417
By Bismarck.Inference 2014-06-12 19:37:23
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »
Didn't say substantially better, just, better. Umbani Cap for one, the new sparks ring with MAB for 2, Augmented Demon ring for 3, Vanir knife 4.

Unless you were getting storm, and then the obi would've been better than aquiline anyway.

Totally forgot about Umbani having magic damage, herpderp.

I normally have storm on but shouldn't account for that large of a difference. Bismarck wizardry confirmed.
 
Offline
Posts:
By 2014-06-12 19:42:31
 Undelete | Edit  | Link | Quote | Reply
 
Post deleted by User.
 Bismarck.Inference
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Inference
Posts: 417
By Bismarck.Inference 2014-06-12 19:46:19
Link | Quote | Reply
 
You're right. Not my day, wasn't including staff bonus.
Offline
Posts: 38
By ElysiumTK 2014-06-12 20:18:59
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Frostbite doing 9999999999999999 first day~
 Bismarck.Snprphnx
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Snprphnx
Posts: 2715
By Bismarck.Snprphnx 2014-06-12 20:34:31
Link | Quote | Reply
 
ElysiumTK said: »
Frostbite doing 9999999999999999 first day~
Like that one update when Cure 1 would deal 99,999 damage to undead? That was great.
 Leviathan.Xsoahc
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: ChaosX128
Posts: 107
By Leviathan.Xsoahc 2014-06-12 20:43:04
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Just got dancing edge, so there goes my gust slash spam... oh and DE is unchanged. D'oh!
 Shiva.Spathaian
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Spathaian
Posts: 27982
By Shiva.Spathaian 2014-06-12 20:51:41
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Xsoahc said: »
Just got dancing edge, so there goes my gust slash spam... oh and DE is unchanged. D'oh!
Actually it got a 10% increase to its Dex mod.
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2014-06-12 21:24:33
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Carbuncle.Xenhas said: »
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Odin.Jassik said: »
Did they not boost Macc on Ageha? /flipdesk

It's the same as Tourb and a few others. It's not MA vs ME but proc rate. The additional effect has a floored proc rate (Kaiser sword vs IT++ as an example) and thus won't even get to the MA/ME check for duration.

*note, I think it was the Kaiser sword that had additional effect: Curse which would rarely proc.


The floored proc rate is due to a m.acc issue with the WS and spells. It became more apparent once GK had tons of m.acc on them. It is still an issue that needs to be addressed.

Macc and proc are two unrelated functions. Macc is only checked after a proc happens. Right now there are many abilities that have broken proc rates. Its easy to test, just use on a level 40~60 monster. You will have such an overwhelming amount of base MACC that it being resisted (two or more failed checks) would be nearly impossible statistically. Use the ability and wait a few minutes to see for a wear off message. If after ten attempts you don't see the message, then the proc rate is bugged or is fixed at an obscenely low value.

Proc rates that aren't fixed are determined by plevel vs mlevel. Macc/Mevd has nothing to do with it.
 Bismarck.Snprphnx
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: Snprphnx
Posts: 2715
By Bismarck.Snprphnx 2014-06-13 03:43:27
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Valli said: »
My set is better than this and I could only get 2300 max on cherti, what witchcraft did you use to get that high.

Sorry, gear collector didnt pull all my gear out and some gear didnt get swapped properly. Here is the set i was using when I we last did Cherti. This gives me 3360 damage with no weather.
ItemSet 324796
I can only assume I was either Firesday or I was getting Fire Weather, because looking back in the chatlogs, this was the damage i was getting
Snprphnx uses Wildfire.
Cherti takes 3844 points of damage.
First Page 2 3 4 5 6 7 8