|
Random Politics & Religion #00
By fonewear 2015-05-05 09:22:01
So when people complain on how ineffective and inefficient the government is and how convoluted the courts are, you can say it's working as intended. Well I'm open to ways we can streamline the courts. But do we really wanna be crying to big brother every time someone says something offensive?
Yes my feelings matter ! I want to be insulated from anything offensive !
Ragnarok.Nausi
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 6709
By Ragnarok.Nausi 2015-05-05 09:24:06
How the hell can anyone define something so vague as "emotional harm" ? That could literally be millions of different things. You hurt my feels bro.
[+]
VIP
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-05-05 09:25:19
Streamlining the legal system isn't necessarily a good thing. Lots of innocent people already go to jail thanks to over zealous prosecutors. Freedom-loving Americans should want it to be difficult to put people in jail.
By fonewear 2015-05-05 09:26:03
If we actually legislated based on "feelings" I suspect everyone would be in jail...
[+]
By fonewear 2015-05-05 09:27:05
On that note to be a good attorney you should leave your "feels" at the door !
[+]
By fonewear 2015-05-05 09:28:11
This article is so terrible it is quite good: (on feels)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-robbins/personal-development_b_1634273.html
Here are a few things you can do to enhance your capacity to honor your own feelings:
Be Real About How You Truly Feel -- The first step of any process is always about being real, first and foremost with ourselves. Even if we feel unclear or uncomfortable with a specific situation or certain set of emotions or desires, the more willing we are to be real about what we truly feel and want, the more ability we'll have to honor ourselves and be authentic with others. Making it a practice of getting in touch with our true feelings is essential. A great way to do this is through journaling. It's not about justifying how we feel to anyone else, it's about being honest with ourselves.
Stop Judging Yourself -- One of the biggest things that can get in our way in life, in general and specifically when it comes to feeling our feelings and expressing our desires, is self-judgment. We think to ourselves, "I shouldn't feel this way," or "If I share this, they will think I'm a terrible person." We use these self-critical thoughts to suppress our true feelings, which can have significantly negative consequences on us and others. What if we just allowed ourselves to be real and to honor what's true for us in the moment, without judging it?
Give Yourself Permission to Feel -- Because of our self-judgment, we sometimes don't give ourselves permission to feel... especially certain emotions. As human beings we tend to have a hierarchy of emotions -- liking the "good" ones (love, joy, gratitude, peace, etc.) and not liking the "bad" ones (anger, fear, hurt, powerlessness, etc.). However, at the deepest level, all human emotions have value and can benefit us if we're willing to feel them in an authentic and healthy way. Giving ourselves permission to feel what we're feeling is critical to our ability to honor and move through our emotions in a way that serves us, our relationships, and our life.
Let Go of Your "Story" -- Many of us, myself included, are attached to our "story." We love all of the drama and all of the details that make up the relationships, situations, and circumstances in our lives (both past and present). While our life story, as well as the details of specific relationships and circumstances in our lives, is important at some level, too often we get caught in the story and all the drama, which actually takes us out of our emotional experience. Where we have real power is in feeling our feelings, not talking about them, rationalizing them, or explaining them -- but in simply feeling them. Human emotions are not sustainable -- especially if they are authentically felt. It only takes about a minute or two to genuinely feel and move through an emotion. However, when we attach an emotion to a story, we don't allow ourselves to truly feel it and thus can keep it stuck in place.
Get Emotional Support -- As important as our emotions are to our lives, our wellbeing, and our relationships, sadly we don't get a lot of emotional training in life (through school, at work, and in general), and we don't often have built-in, healthy emotional support mechanisms in our daily lives. We live in a world that is primarily focused on action, results, and appearances -- none of which has anything to do with our emotional experience (even though our emotional experience is not only one of the most important aspects of our lives, but is what drives much of what we do and produce in life). There are, however, many ways we can find or enhance our emotional support. Most of us have certain emotional support structures in our lives that we've set up for ourselves, consciously or unconsciously. The key is for us to utilize these in a consistent and authentic way, as well as to make sure they are empowering us to honor ourselves and our emotional experiences in life.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-05 09:29:07
Lots of innocent people already go to jail thanks to over zealous prosecutors. Define "innocent" in your own words.
Also, name an offence where somebody broke the law and doesn't deserve jail time. Might help if you name the state the law was broken also.
VIP
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-05-05 09:31:50
Lots of innocent people already go to jail thanks to over zealous prosecutors. Define "innocent" in your own words.
Also, name an offence where somebody broke the law and doesn't deserve jail time.
Innocent, as in, not guilty of the crime they are charged with... How does that require clarification? Or are you saying that because someone commits one crime they deserve to go to jail for one they didn't?
Name an offense where someone breaks the law and doesn't deserve jail time? Parking violations...
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-05 09:35:35
Innocent, as in, not guilty of the crime they are charged with... How does that require clarification? Or are you saying that because someone commits one crime they deserve to go to jail for one they didn't? They would have to have been proven to have broken the law before they receive jail time. That's what the whole "innocent vs. guilty" thing is all about, since you failed to grasp that concept.
Or are you alluding that cops/prosecutors just randomly pick people off the street and throw them in jail for the fun of it? Because that is what you just said....
Name an offense where someone breaks the law and doesn't deserve jail time? Parking violations... Name a state where you would go to jail for a parking violation. Because I can prove to you that you are wrong.
Seraph.Ramyrez
Server: Seraph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1918
By Seraph.Ramyrez 2015-05-05 09:47:25
Also, name an offence where somebody broke the law and doesn't deserve jail time
There are many very good reasons why we should stop putting in prison people for solely drug-related charges.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-05 09:51:57
Also, name an offence where somebody broke the law and doesn't deserve jail time
There are many very good reasons why we should stop putting in prison people for solely drug-related charges. Still illegal in all but, what, 2 states, and only for one type of controlled substance? Besides, do you honestly think that making drugs legal will help people? You do know that a majority of drug-related crime also has other crimes attached to it, like assault, battery, larceny, fraud, theft, and so on?
Seraph.Ramyrez
Server: Seraph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1918
By Seraph.Ramyrez 2015-05-05 09:53:10
Also, name an offence where somebody broke the law and doesn't deserve jail time
There are many very good reasons why we should stop putting in prison people for solely drug-related charges. Still illegal in all but, what, 2 states, and only for one type of controlled substance? Besides, do you honestly think that making drugs legal will help people? You do know that a majority of drug-related crime also has other crimes attached to it, like assault, battery, larceny, fraud, theft, and so on?
Hence "drug-related".
do you honestly think that making drugs legal will help people
I think that a big part of the country's drug problem is tied up in its problems of race, poverty, social stratification, health care, crime in general, and problems with law-enforcement relations.
And I think the "War on drugs" has lost us billions and ammounted to very little success...inversely, it has cost us and others dearly.
Not only are we fueling our own problems with our treatment of controlled substances, we've created a booming industry in Central and South America that has threatened their innocent citizens, destablized their governments and societies, and contributed to our immigration woes.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-05 09:55:51
Also, name an offence where somebody broke the law and doesn't deserve jail time
There are many very good reasons why we should stop putting in prison people for solely drug-related charges. Still illegal in all but, what, 2 states, and only for one type of controlled substance? Besides, do you honestly think that making drugs legal will help people? You do know that a majority of drug-related crime also has other crimes attached to it, like assault, battery, larceny, fraud, theft, and so on?
Hence "drug-related". Hence "why it is still illegal" and "why putting people in prison for solely drug-related charges" still exist.
Because a dealer in your case would not go to jail, he is just a middleman in the supply chain. Still causes more civil discord than any single druggie does.
Lakshmi.Flavin
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2015-05-05 09:57:44
There have been innocent people in prison, this is a fact. There is thought to be others that are still in there.
Assuming that our system is perfect and no mistakes have ever been made is laughable. Mistakes have been made.
You don't actually have to be guilty to be convicted just like you can be guilty and be found innocent.
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-05-05 09:58:41
But do we really wanna be crying to big brother every time someone says something offensive? No.
Seraph.Ramyrez
Server: Seraph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 1918
By Seraph.Ramyrez 2015-05-05 09:59:15
This article is so terrible it is quite good: (on feels)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mike-robbins/personal-development_b_1634273.html
Here are a few things you can do to enhance your capacity to honor your own feelings:
Be Real About How You Truly Feel -- The first step of any process is always about being real, first and foremost with ourselves. Even if we feel unclear or uncomfortable with a specific situation or certain set of emotions or desires, the more willing we are to be real about what we truly feel and want, the more ability we'll have to honor ourselves and be authentic with others. Making it a practice of getting in touch with our true feelings is essential. A great way to do this is through journaling. It's not about justifying how we feel to anyone else, it's about being honest with ourselves.
Stop Judging Yourself -- One of the biggest things that can get in our way in life, in general and specifically when it comes to feeling our feelings and expressing our desires, is self-judgment. We think to ourselves, "I shouldn't feel this way," or "If I share this, they will think I'm a terrible person." We use these self-critical thoughts to suppress our true feelings, which can have significantly negative consequences on us and others. What if we just allowed ourselves to be real and to honor what's true for us in the moment, without judging it?
Give Yourself Permission to Feel -- Because of our self-judgment, we sometimes don't give ourselves permission to feel... especially certain emotions. As human beings we tend to have a hierarchy of emotions -- liking the "good" ones (love, joy, gratitude, peace, etc.) and not liking the "bad" ones (anger, fear, hurt, powerlessness, etc.). However, at the deepest level, all human emotions have value and can benefit us if we're willing to feel them in an authentic and healthy way. Giving ourselves permission to feel what we're feeling is critical to our ability to honor and move through our emotions in a way that serves us, our relationships, and our life.
Let Go of Your "Story" -- Many of us, myself included, are attached to our "story." We love all of the drama and all of the details that make up the relationships, situations, and circumstances in our lives (both past and present). While our life story, as well as the details of specific relationships and circumstances in our lives, is important at some level, too often we get caught in the story and all the drama, which actually takes us out of our emotional experience. Where we have real power is in feeling our feelings, not talking about them, rationalizing them, or explaining them -- but in simply feeling them. Human emotions are not sustainable -- especially if they are authentically felt. It only takes about a minute or two to genuinely feel and move through an emotion. However, when we attach an emotion to a story, we don't allow ourselves to truly feel it and thus can keep it stuck in place.
Get Emotional Support -- As important as our emotions are to our lives, our wellbeing, and our relationships, sadly we don't get a lot of emotional training in life (through school, at work, and in general), and we don't often have built-in, healthy emotional support mechanisms in our daily lives. We live in a world that is primarily focused on action, results, and appearances -- none of which has anything to do with our emotional experience (even though our emotional experience is not only one of the most important aspects of our lives, but is what drives much of what we do and produce in life). There are, however, many ways we can find or enhance our emotional support. Most of us have certain emotional support structures in our lives that we've set up for ourselves, consciously or unconsciously. The key is for us to utilize these in a consistent and authentic way, as well as to make sure they are empowering us to honor ourselves and our emotional experiences in life.
You know, if you actually took some of these things to heart and tried to get yourself straight emotionally rather than just mocking them, I bet you'd feel a lot better about life. ^^;
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-05 10:00:15
There have been innocent people in prison, this is a fact. There is thought to be others that are still in there. Very few people. Or are you going to say "lots of innocent people" like Jassik did?
You know, not substantiate the number.
You don't actually have to be guilty to be convicted just like you can be guilty and be found innocent. Like I said, very few people.
You do know what statistical norm means, right? Six Sigma? You are talking about the outliers of the 6 sigma on a standard bellcurve, the ~.2% of people fall under, ~.1% innocent but found guilty and the ~.1% guilty but found innocent. Should we revoke laws because people have been falling outside the 6 sigma of a standard bellcurve?
By fonewear 2015-05-05 10:00:27
I can't feel that feel anymore though...
VIP
Server: Odin
Game: FFXI
Posts: 9534
By Odin.Jassik 2015-05-05 10:00:55
Innocent, as in, not guilty of the crime they are charged with... How does that require clarification? Or are you saying that because someone commits one crime they deserve to go to jail for one they didn't? They would have to have been proven to have broken the law before they receive jail time. That's what the whole "innocent vs. guilty" thing is all about, since you failed to grasp that concept.
Or are you alluding that cops/prosecutors just randomly pick people off the street and throw them in jail for the fun of it? Because that is what you just said....
Name an offense where someone breaks the law and doesn't deserve jail time? Parking violations... Name a state where you would go to jail for a parking violation. Because I can prove to you that you are wrong.
I wouldn't accuse police of randomly picking people off the street, but it has been shown quite clearly that innocent people are falsely convicted often enough to take a step back and figure out what we're doing wrong.
As for parking violations, you said to name a law that people shouldn't go to jail if they break. Here's one they should, wire fraud, the crime a large number of bankers committed but were never even charged with.
You undermine your "tough on crime" stance at every turn.
By fonewear 2015-05-05 10:02:24
Police are too busy killing brown people to worry about parking violations !
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2015-05-05 10:02:28
Be back in a little bit. I have an article on the ethical dilemmas posed by robots.
In the meantime here's this:
Quote: Construction work has begun on the first factory in China’s manufacturing hub of Dongguan to use only robots for production, the official Xinhua news agency reported.
A total of 1,000 robots would be introduced at the factory initially, run by Shenzhen Evenwin Precision Technology Co, with the aim of reducing the current workforce of 1,800 by 90 per cent to only about 200, Chen Xingqi, the chairman of the company’s board, was quoted as saying in the report.
The company did not give a figure for the investment in the factory, but said its production capacity could reach a value of 2 billion yuan (US$322 million) annually. Robots only! China manufacturing plant to reduce human employees by 90%
By fonewear 2015-05-05 10:04:14
Be back in a little bit. I have an article on the ethical dilemmas posed by robots.
In the meantime here's this:
Quote: Construction work has begun on the first factory in China’s manufacturing hub of Dongguan to use only robots for production, the official Xinhua news agency reported.
A total of 1,000 robots would be introduced at the factory initially, run by Shenzhen Evenwin Precision Technology Co, with the aim of reducing the current workforce of 1,800 by 90 per cent to only about 200, Chen Xingqi, the chairman of the company’s board, was quoted as saying in the report.
The company did not give a figure for the investment in the factory, but said its production capacity could reach a value of 2 billion yuan (US$322 million) annually. Robots only! China manufacturing plant to reduce human employees by 90%
Won't someone please think of the artificial intelligence feels !
By fonewear 2015-05-05 10:07:12
Why we drink:
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2015-05-05 10:09:55
I wouldn't accuse police of randomly picking people off the street, but it has been shown quite clearly that innocent people are falsely convicted often enough to take a step back and figure out what we're doing wrong. Show the source where a lot of people are being falsely convicted. Mind you, it has to be a primary source (like the Department of Justice) and not a secondary source (like huffpost). Because I highly doubt you can sift through the fluff of an article and see cherrypicking arguments where they stand.
As for parking violations, you said to name a law that people shouldn't go to jail if they break. I also said name a state where that law would put the person in jail. Just because you fail to quote me doesn't mean that I never said it.
Here's one they should, wire fraud, the crime a large number of bankers committed but were never even charged with. Wire fraud is a federal offence, also punishable by up to 20 years in jail.
But if you have evidence that a "large number of bankers committed" this crime, why not go to the FBI and present it? Remember, infowars.com is not evidence.
Lakshmi.Flavin
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 18466
By Lakshmi.Flavin 2015-05-05 10:11:00
I wouldn't accuse police of randomly picking people off the street, but it has been shown quite clearly that innocent people are falsely convicted often enough to take a step back and figure out what we're doing wrong. Appearantly here it wasn't random but they picked up people that they thought no one else would give a ***about and then "coerced" them into a confession. John Burge is thought to have tortured over 200 people and many of them have been released now. His actions not only were criminal but cost the city he worked for over $100,000,000 in settlements, reviews and court costs...
The idea that people justify things by saying that the number of innocent people convicted is negligible so that makes it ok or something is laughable. This usually stems from the idea that the one convicted is already guilty of something else at least or that it never affects them so its ok.
By fonewear 2015-05-05 10:36:47
In political news: Mike Huckabee is running for President !
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20130
By Shiva.Nikolce 2015-05-05 11:50:34
In political news: Mike Huckabee is running for President !
I, for one, didn't believe you.....and then I discovered to my horror that this is true...
when are we going to get smart and burn hope arkansas to the ground?
Siren.Mosin
By Siren.Mosin 2015-05-05 11:54:19
so is ben carson.
Bahamut.Kara
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3544
By Bahamut.Kara 2015-05-05 11:56:19
False convictions occur on a much larger scale than .2%.
The government does not keep track of those who are pardoned.
There was a topic a few years ago that discussed this.
Some information p.6Carbuncle.Lynxblade said: » Do you think only guilty people are convicted?
99.999% of the time yeah. >_>
Since I have more numbers now from The National Registry of Exonerations, we can look at rough (seriously rough) statistics.
According to the US Department of Justice there were Quote: There were 6.98 million offenders under the supervision of the adult correctional systems at yearend 2011 This includes people who are on probation, in jail, parole, or in prison. In both state and federal custody.
In order for your statistic to be accurate for all crimes here (not just felonies) only 69.8 (70) people should be innocent, or at least exonerated.
The US (as a government entity) does not keep track of exonerations via a database, so the numbers from The National Registry of Exonerations (a joint project by two law schools) are those they have found and verified, which is 1133 at this moment from 1989. This does not include Quote: at least 1,100 convicted defendants who were cleared since 1995 in 12 “group exonerations,” that occurred after it was discovered that police officers had deliberately framed dozens or hundreds of innocent defendants, mostly for drug and gun crimes.
This does not go into the fact that most exonerations are not known or widely publicized, so there is no way to know how many occur each year. p.96
Quote: If so, why are these exonerations unknown? The fundamental reason is that there is no official method for recording exonerations. James Ochoa, for example, had his conviction vacated on motion of the Orange County, California District Attorney, and then charges were dismissed. If you examined the court records, that’s probably all you’d see. There might be no way whatever to know that it was an exoneration. Convictions are vacated for a host of more common reasons; modification of the sentence, for example. As a result, a record search would be extremely difficult even if the records were kept in one place. In fact, it’s impossible. Court records in America are scattered across 94 federal districts and several thousand county courthouses, and police records are even harder to locate.
....
Several attorneys who have obtained exonerations at this early stage have told us that it can be comparatively easy to persuade the prosecutor and the judge who tried a case to reopen it and to reverse the conviction when the trial is still fresh in their minds and before the case is taken over by other prosecutors and other judges on appeal – assuming, of course, that there is persuasive new evidence that the defendant is innocent. The hearing may be seen as a low-key process of correcting an error before it’s passed on. By the same token, they say, everybody understands that this sort of in-house error correction is supposed to remain in house. Rayshard Futrell’s appellate lawyer has told us that it would probably have been considerably more difficult to reach an agreement to release him if his case had attracted attention from the media.
So, no I think based on these numbers/facts that the 99.999% of people in jail are guilty is wrong. If you (or anyone) has time to read the document it is incredibly interesting (and has sources!).
I'm really concerned about the "family search" part. That seems entirely too invasive of a process seeing how police officers are extremely prejudiced when it comes to investigating a crime (confirmation bias). How hard would it be for someone to murder someone else, then drop some of their DNA in the area. Would only take a few weeks of facebook trolling to gather all the requires information then just wait for an opportune moment when that person would have no credible alibi.
People really should watch that video I posted earlier, I guarantee it will change your life.
Police are not the only ones guilty of confirmation bias/or feel the noble need to help put bad guys away, but also the lab techs who are running the tests. I did not realize how many instances of faulty forensic analysis (on all forensics not just DNA) have occurred (that have been found). Below are just a few of the examples from http://www.nacdl.org/NewsReleases.aspx?id=26459
Quote: Massachusetts 2013:
State chemist Sonja Farak has been accused of tampering with drug evidence, potentially affecting 60,000 samples in 34,000 cases.
2012 – Chemist Annie Dookhan has been accused of falsifying drug sample test results, forging paperwork and mixing up samples. Since then, over 200 defendants have been released and their cases have been put on hold while their lawyers challenge their convictions. Dookhan is believed to have been doing this for years.
Illinois 2011 – A former Detroit crime lab was abandoned with evidence left in the abandoned building for anyone to have access to. The lab, which closed in 2008, was investigated and it was discovered that the lab workers had been habitually sloppy and had high error rates.
New York 5/2010 – A NYPD criminalist was found to have taken shortcuts in testing drugs leading to unreliable results. The criminalist under question tested a substance for cocaine, determined it was negative and instead of retesting the sample, she marked the substance as positive for cocaine, leading all of the samples she had tested to be questioned.
Or just plain bad science on the part of the lab techs, that for some reason no one disputed.
Quote: In 1987, Roadcap explained to the jury at the rape/murder trial of Barry Laughman, that the killer's blood type "morphed" from B to A-to match Laughman's blood type-due to antibiotics the victim was taking at the time of her death. Her fantasy science stood for 16 years, until Laughman was cleared by DNA.
The National Academy of Sciences issued a report in 2009, Strengthing Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward, found that most of the science used in crime labs lacks any form of peer review or validation. Jay A. Siegel, NAS member, said "In a nutshell, these people aren't scientists. They don't know what validation is. They don't know what it means to validate a test".
As to familial DNA matching, I don't know how anyone can agree with this. This goes beyond someone who has been arrested on probable cause and into the realm of making everyone who is related to a criminal assumed to be a criminal, as the default assumption.
I'm still more concerned more about stupidity (see above :)) than malicious intent, but of course this can happen. Especially if it is crime scene tech who has the malicious intent.
Quote: In a bench trial, Nebraska Judge Randall Rehmeier found that prosecutors had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that Kofoed had planted blood from the murder victim in a car in an attempt to tie two innocent men to the crime. The men were eventually cleared and two Wisconsin residents were convicted of the murder.
Bahamut.Ravael
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 13643
By Bahamut.Ravael 2015-05-05 11:58:43
In political news: Mike Huckabee is running for President !
I, for one, didn't believe you.....and then I discovered to my horror that this is true...
when are we going to get smart and burn hope arkansas to the ground?
You're the one with the doomsday devices. Stop being lazy and do it yourself.
Random Politics & Religion is for topics that aren't thread worthy on their own and do not have their own existing thread.
Rules and Guidelines
Forum Rules and P&R Section Guidelines still apply.
Satire is tolerated.
If your topic covers a story over 6 months old (Watergate, Benghazi, 2012 Election, etc.) post it here.
Discussions on racism, homophobia, transphobia, and the like are allowed, targeted insults based on these will not be tolerated.
Political debates get heated and are meant to be intense, if you take offense to being called or proven wrong, you don't belong here.
If you can't take the heat, get out of the kitchen; if you prove you can't handle the criticism you bring upon yourself in this thread, you may be removed from it. You are responsible for what you post.
Along those lines, heat is fine, but sustained, clearly personal hostility is not okay. The personal attack rules still apply. Attack positions, not posters. Failure to adhere to this will result in your removal from the thread.
This thread is NOT the Flame Core.
These rules are subject to change and modification where and when needed.
Random Politics & Religion may be mained or demained depending on the activity within at a Moderator's discretion.
With that out of the way, let the debates begin!
/bow
|
|