|
Comcast looking to impose data limits
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 15:36:43
I'm not a liberal, at least by any current definition of the term, but continue being delusional, after all: it's what you're best at.
None of those things are scandals or lies, but go on and continue pretending they are, as it's the only thing you have, as you have nothing.
I don't care if you consider what Clinton said a lie or not, I have my own beef with the man, and it has to do with a lot more important things than him getting a ***.
You're a hardline Fox dribble troll, and that's all you're good for.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-05-15 15:43:48
That's all you had to say and I knew right there that it was a *** post.
Why not be honest with yourself more?
Ragnarok.Sekundes
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4212
By Ragnarok.Sekundes 2014-05-15 15:51:40
A) I don't use Comcast, so it's not directly effecting me. You may think it doesn't but it will have an indirect effect. It sets a precedent which will spread rapidly through other ISPs. Also, any people or sites that DO have Comcast(which is going to be a giganitic portion of the US after the merger) will have the issue so that may affect you in part to certain sites or people.
B) There are multiple options everywhere, you just got to know where to look. ***. Sure... you can get dial up or satilite instead but neither of those options is viable in today's world. Some areas even offer slightly better DSL but that's still borderline worthless. So yeah... you can claim the same *** the ISPs claim but it isn't a practical solution and it doesn't create competition.
If GM was the only person who made cars you can't say that by another company selling horses, that they have competition...
C) I'm not defending anything. I mentioned that the Satellite internet providers have been doing these restrictions for years, and some people are finally pitching a fit over it because it's Comcast doing it... There are many companies who have data caps in various things but unless they came out of the gate with those data caps, you're full of it if you think no one cared or didn't say anything.
[+]
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-05-15 16:07:10
Ragnarok.Sekundes said: »You may think it doesn't but it will have an indirect effect. It sets a precedent which will spread rapidly through other ISPs. Also, any people or sites that DO have Comcast(which is going to be a giganitic portion of the US after the merger) will have the issue so that may affect you in part to certain sites or people. You think that this is the first ISP to issue limits after the fact but they really aren't. The precedent has already been set, and this can either have no effect to the company or have them lose customers.
Ragnarok.Sekundes said: »***. Sure... you can get dial up or satilite instead but neither of those options is viable in today's world. Some areas even offer slightly better DSL but that's still borderline worthless. So yeah... you can claim the same *** the ISPs claim but it isn't a practical solution and it doesn't create competition.
If GM was the only person who made cars you can't say that by another company selling horses, that they have competition...
I use Clear ISP, and it looks like they are hitting everywhere that Comcast and Time Warner Cable has a strong hold in. And it's better internet than Time Warner and ATT (another competitor, oh my!) in my opinion.
Then there's Sprint, Verison, heck, even Hughsnet is available to most people.
To say that there is no competition for internet service providers is like saying that there is no other car manufacturers other than General Motors...oh wai....
Ragnarok.Sekundes said: »There are many companies who have data caps in various things but unless they came out of the gate with those data caps, you're full of it if you think no one cared or didn't say anything. I had Hughsnet ISP before they came out with these limits, and as soon as they started having these limits, I dropped them and switched to ATT. Just because you limit yourself to what you first see without shopping around doesn't mean that everyone else does the same. Not our fault you are lazy.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 16:13:34
I apparently used 466GB of data in March, and 231GB of data in April, I need to dig to see if I can see how much I used before I moved my server here.
edit: I forgot that I rebuilt it in March, I don't recall when I moved it, but I have no way of finding out really now. Oh well.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3621
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-05-15 16:36:13
I may just be confused, but glancing at that site, it sure just sounds like a mobile network. That is now under Sprint's umbrella. It claims to offer great coverage, but Sprint as a telecom tends to drop calls regularly throughout my city (for what little it's worth, I use Verizon, which gives excellent coverage except where I work). In what sense is this a home ISP? In fact, the site straight-up says that it doesn't do internet service anymore...
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2014-05-15 16:40:41
He links to a page that directly says they are part of Sprint then goes on to talk about Sprint as if its different >.>
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-05-15 16:53:50
I may just be confused, but glancing at that site, it sure just sounds like a mobile network. That is now under Sprint's umbrella. It claims to offer great coverage, but Sprint as a telecom tends to drop calls regularly throughout my city (for what little it's worth, I use Verizon, which gives excellent coverage except where I work). In what sense is this a home ISP? In fact, the site straight-up says that it doesn't do internet service anymore... Well, it changed within the last month, because I didn't see that it was absorbed by Sprint.
I haven't seen any difference in service recently either.
Well crap, now I may have to change my ISP if it starts becoming crappy.
Server: Sylph
Game: FFXI
Posts: 15066
By Sylph.Tigerwoods 2014-05-15 17:16:21
There's pretty much no reason to support this ever; unless they're buying you out.
It's likely their lowest plans, at minimum are going to be the same price people are paying now; and increase from there. That said, nobody is going to save money from this (or a very very small minority)
[+]
Ragnarok.Sekundes
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4212
By Ragnarok.Sekundes 2014-05-15 18:22:30
You think that this is the first ISP to issue limits after the fact but they really aren't. The precedent has already been set, and this can either have no effect to the company or have them lose customers.
I do not think it is the first and nor do I think it will the last but you need to understand how critical it is when an ISP as large as comcast and of the cable broadband variety starts doing it. If we just roll over and taking it, this WILL impact other ISPs and it is not in a direction internet users are going to like.
Trust me when I say that a cell phone data network is not a replacement for a solid broadband internet. What's your data cap on your internet right now? And what kind of ping times do you get?
Part of this has been addressed by others saying clear is owned by sprint. And things like this will continue to happen. If left to their own devices, larger companies will eat up and shutdown what's left of the already meager competition.
I'm sad that my analogy fell on deaf ears. I thought it was pretty funny in a frighteningly accurate way. Yes, there are a couple for some people but saying there are plenty of options for MOST people is just plain wrong. You can make claims that seem good to the uninformed or the outside and this is exactly what the large ISPs are saying to sweep the details under the rug so they can make more money by taking advantage of monopolistic conditions and special protections.
I had Hughsnet ISP before they came out with these limits, and as soon as they started having these limits, I dropped them and switched to ATT. Just because you limit yourself to what you first see without shopping around doesn't mean that everyone else does the same. Not our fault you are lazy.
I had ATT at first, they pissed me off with their shitty service and billing so I switched to TWC, which also has sucked and has terrible service. My only other options right now would drastically reduce my ability to do my job or play my games. Both of these companies are the same. And if they have their way, one will eventually buy the other, if not they will continue to circumvent competition by intentionally cutting out service areas and splitting them up so they don't compete as much and price fixing.
Please, look around and research this. We don't need anyone excusing this due to lack of information. If you took a bit to research, you'd see how terrible the US's connections are vs the rest of the world and would be able to see why the situation has let itself get so bad. You point at me saying I'm lazy and everything would be rainbows and butterflies if I'd just get off my *** and look around but I feel you've made a huge mistake.
[+]
By fonewear 2014-05-15 18:51:03
That's all you had to say and I knew right there that it was a *** post.
Why not be honest with yourself more?
Being honest. That means I have to give up living in denial ? Never.
[+]
Ragnarok.Tatsiki
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 127
By Ragnarok.Tatsiki 2014-05-15 19:12:12
The Onion is not a reliable source Jet.
Just letting you know there.
Actually King, a lot of things the government does is because corporations are backing them or threatening otherwise. Remember Google's blackout? Congress had to shoot down SOPA and PIPA because of Google blacking out.
Then there's the fact of there is already cures for cancer (See: Immunotherapy) but the government won't sanction the cure. Why? Because they make way too much off of chemo-therapy to willingly accept the cures.
It's not tin foil hatting though, this is real stuff and it makes me want to vomit when people find out they truly have no say unless they are holding a big wad of cash in front of a politician.
I mean, who do you think the main funders of the election candidates' campaigns are?
Leviathan.Chaosx
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
Posts: 20284
By Leviathan.Chaosx 2014-05-15 19:29:30
Cablevision ftw. Will never touch Comcast, personally.
No restrictions, very fast, and lots of first notices about copyright nonsense. They just change your IP for their own legal reasons. Last first notice was 4-5 years ago too.
Also tons of Wifi hot spots all around too.
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 19:31:59
Google's (and a lot of other parts of the internet's) blackout was some corporate pressure butting heads with other corporate pressure. Bob Goodlatte is who we have to thank for being the puppet of the pro overbearing copyright/patent masters and putting that bill and subsequent ones in front of others, it baffles me as to how he has kept his seat for over 20 years.
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 207
By Lakshmi.Inspectorgadget 2014-05-15 20:15:31
Comcast had a monopoly on high speed internet when I lived in Downtown San Jose, so I had to put up with their crap for 4 years. I went over their then cap of 250GB plenty of times, however they don't really do anything about it but send a warning letter and try to sell me Business Class Cable internet(i.e. the same ***as residential, speed and all) which costs 3 times as much for no reason. Its sickening that companies are allowed to do this. Google Fiber has already made plans on entering this area and hopefully either force Comcast to delimit its customers or go out of business for good.
Ragnarok.Sekundes
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4212
By Ragnarok.Sekundes 2014-05-15 21:37:41
Lakshmi.Inspectorgadget said: »Comcast had a monopoly on high speed internet when I lived in Downtown San Jose, so I had to put up with their crap for 4 years. I went over their then cap of 250GB plenty of times, however they don't really do anything about it but send a warning letter and try to sell me Business Class Cable internet(i.e. the same ***as residential, speed and all) which costs 3 times as much for no reason. Its sickening that companies are allowed to do this. Google Fiber has already made plans on entering this area and hopefully either force Comcast to delimit its customers or go out of business for good. It's funny how quick other companies step up their game when they actually have competition. We have several offices in San Antonio and Austin which google fiber is getting prepped to set up in and already they've spammed everyone with notices that they are offering gigabit or similar services.
I'm just so jealous of all these other cities getting it and I don't see much hope in this area getting it. Regardless, even just having google fiber talk about your area is likely going to have some competitive forces start churning so enjoy!
By Altimaomega 2014-05-15 21:50:16
Whats the matter guys? All I hear in these forums is that more regulations and more taxes are good things! Sucks when it starts hitting close to home huh!
[+]
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 21:50:28
Interestingly enough, it looks like the best way to get Google to look at your area is to get with your city and get them to send Google the records they need to survey it. OR better yet as a lot of it is public record, you can attempt to do a lot of the work for them. I'm assuming a certain population density is required for them to consider it if they have a lot of work to do still, but if a city has a lot of the infrastructure in place, well then it wouldn't be hard for them to roll in.
It'd be a matter of politics though at that point.
Garuda.Chanti
Server: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11817
By Garuda.Chanti 2014-05-15 21:50:32
I am SO happy to be on Grant County Fiber.
Fiber to my wall from a public utility district.
And electrical costs so low I can afford to mine bitcoins. I just can't afford the mining computer. Or the air conditioner.
Maybe for winter. /laugh
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 21:51:15
Whats the matter guys? All I hear in these forums is that more regulations and more taxes are good things! Sucks when it starts hitting close to home huh! god you're *** stupid, part of a lack of regulation (or enforcement thereof) is why ***like this is happening.
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 21:52:35
I am SO happy to be on Grant County Fiber.
Fiber to my wall from a public utility district.
And electrical costs so low I can afford to mine bitcoins. I just can't afford the mining computer. Or the air conditioner.
Maybe for winter. /laugh Honestly anymore I don't see how an individual can make money doing it, unless they're part of a group. Now somebody who owns a cyber-cafe or the like and runs mining on the machines when they're not in use, perhaps. But I don't see it as a great source of income even then.
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 21:54:48
That's all you had to say and I knew right there that it was a *** post.
Why not be honest with yourself more? I know you have an issue seeing outside of your "us vs them" world, but just because I don't agree with you or your fellow neocons, it doesn't make me a liberal.
Garuda.Chanti
Server: Garuda
Game: FFXI
Posts: 11817
By Garuda.Chanti 2014-05-15 21:57:29
No Jet. Its the cost of the electricity for the computer / value of bitcoins.
The biggest bitcoin mine is in Wenatchee, Douglass County. Also a PUD. They have the lowest electrical rates on the continent. I have the second lowest.
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 22:00:01
No Jet. Its the cost of the electricity for the computer / value of bitcoins.
The biggest bitcoin mine is in Wenatchee, Douglass County. Also a PUD. They have the lowest electrical rates on the continent. I have the second lowest.
It's more than just electrical costs factored into the equation, plus nothing you just said had much to do with I just said, nor invalidated it.
By aeronx 2014-05-15 22:11:06
That's all you had to say and I knew right there that it was a *** post.
Why not be honest with yourself more? I know you have an issue seeing outside of your "us vs them" world, but just because I don't agree with you or your fellow neocons, it doesn't make me a liberal.
You know its funny that you say that because just because ppl don't agree with you doesn't make them a neocon, just saying.
[+]
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 22:18:30
That's all you had to say and I knew right there that it was a *** post.
Why not be honest with yourself more? I know you have an issue seeing outside of your "us vs them" world, but just because I don't agree with you or your fellow neocons, it doesn't make me a liberal.
You know its funny that you say that because just because ppl don't agree with you doesn't make them a neocon, just saying. There's a long history of evidence to support my statement, you must be new here.
By aeronx 2014-05-15 22:29:25
That's all you had to say and I knew right there that it was a *** post.
Why not be honest with yourself more? I know you have an issue seeing outside of your "us vs them" world, but just because I don't agree with you or your fellow neocons, it doesn't make me a liberal.
You know its funny that you say that because just because ppl don't agree with you doesn't make them a neocon, just saying. There's a long history of evidence to support my statement, you must be new here.
lol how did I know you were going to say something like that. If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck its not a duck aka a liberal, is what your saying? I mean honestly what do you expect ppl to think when they read half your post and almost all of them have a leftist spin, I know your a progressive and they are completely difference I see where the confusion is.
By Jetackuu 2014-05-15 23:02:28
I don't expect somebody with the grammar of a 10 year old to understand, I really don't.
Yes there is a difference between a progressive and what neocons and other conservatives think a liberal is, something many people don't comprehend.
By Altimaomega 2014-05-15 23:15:46
Whats the matter guys? All I hear in these forums is that more regulations and more taxes are good things! Sucks when it starts hitting close to home huh! god you're *** stupid, part of a lack of regulation (or enforcement thereof) is why ***like this is happening.
lol ok so your made about the FCC putting the smack down, and your mad that no regulation at all exists.. Bravo you've entered D. feinstein territory.... Hypocrite!
Quote: Comcast Corp. says it plans to start limiting how much data its customers, which will soon include millions from Time Warner Cable, can use.
According to Computer World, Comcast executive VP David Cohen revealed the cable and Internet service provider would start capping data usage within the next five years. During a media summit with investors in New York on Wednesday, he called it "usage-based billing":
"That is the way you can deliver the equity proposition that heavier users pay more," Cohen said. "It really has nothing to do with [buying TWC]. It's a generic industry-related issue. [It's not] an open Internet issue... We think what we are doing is totally appropriate."
The Verge reports Comcast is testing monthly caps of 300GB (gigabytes) and 600GB in some markets, as well as a "flexible-data" option limited to 5GB. Subscribers who go over those amounts would pay extra fees, similar to the penalty for using too many minutes or text messages on a cell phone plan.
According to Digital Trends, Comcast currently uses 300GB monthly data caps in seven states: Alabama, Georgia, Kentucky, Maine, Mississippi, Tennessee and South Carolina. Users who go over pay $10 for an additional 50GB.
Tech Crunch reports Comcast is "still working out exactly where they can cap things before" customers start complaining and switching providers.
Cohen predicted the majority -- more than 98 percent -- of Comcast's customers wouldn't be affected by data consumption thresholds. However, he did admit it's difficult to predict technology usage, given how much it's changed in the last five years (Netflix, iPads, etc).
And with the company expected to finalize its $45 billion takeover of Time Warner Cable later this year, things could be really different in 2019. For example, another mega-merger is in the works: AT&T is reportedly in talks to buy DirecTV for as much as $50 billion.
But how much is 300GB of data? How much does the average cable television subscriber use versus a cord-cutter?
According to Digital Trends, the average person with Internet-only service uses 212GB of data each month -- more than seven times those who watch traditional television. The bulk of that difference comes from streaming movies and TV shows through services like Netflix, Hulu and Amazon Instant Video.
Comcast's Xfinity site has a data calculator that allows users to predict how much data they'd use. A family with five Internet-connected devices (computers, tablets, smartphones, etc.) that streams 16 two-hour HD movies and 20 hour-long TV shows; visits 100 websites; and listens to 40 hours of streaming music uses 310GB per month.
In related news, the FCC voted 3-2 on Thursday to propose new "net neutrality" rules, allowing ISPs to charge content companies (like Netflix) for faster and more reliable delivery.
http://www.syracuse.com/news/index.ssf/2014/05/comcast_cap_data_usage_limit_time_warner_cable.html
This is fking lame. I'm on Comcast, and stream Netflix quite a bit, and FFXI of course.
|
|