Rich SOB Says Treatment Of Rich Like The Holocast

You can come to a "logical" conclusion to both sides of the issue, but you're too dense to see that.

The loudest voices in the pro-life movement are using religion, not reason to make their argument. It's why we had Sarah Palin trumpeting abstinence before her daughter dun goofed and Rick Santorum trying to align amniocentesis with being a reason people get abortions. Lucky for those two, they have plenty of money to take care of special needs kids. More power to them.

Someone living hand to mouth might not though.

Education and access to birth control tends to get rid of the unplanned pregnancy issues that come with people banging each other in the adult world. Instead some want us to be draped in ignorance rather than solving the problem. The thought of talking about sex and describing what a vagina is so vile we must pretend such things don't exist.

And harp more religion every step of the way. That's wonderful. People who actually want to inform people to make better choices will be teaching sex ed courses and attacking the taboos that lead people to believe pulling out works and that babies are created with faerie magic.

No, it's just impossible to come to a logical conclusion on an emotional or religious argument.

You all complain about derailing then Jet goes ahead and brings up global warming. Sheesh.

Education access. So I take it that you support school choice for all; not just the wealthy?

You don't religion to tell you that killing someone is wrong do you?

Don't get in to the climate change debate again, another issue people ignore the facts on, and think their beliefs hold as much weight as facts.

What is a liberal's response to why we don't allow murder? Okay, shift that logic to the unborn. Sure it can be annoying to have people trying to use religion to justify their polical ideologies, but it's not like there isn't any other way of presenting the argument.

What is a liberal's response to why we don't allow murder? Okay, shift that logic to the unborn. Sure it can be annoying to have people trying to use religion to justify their polical ideologies, but it's not like there isn't any other way of presenting the argument.

The scientific community as a whole has published many articles substantiating the trend, and have been reviewed, contested and continue to be done so, yet the trend continues. This is how science works, should actually try it sometime, you may learn something.



You never once presented a single fact, you just believe there are facts, somewhere out there, that you have never seen but you believe they are there. It's touching really.

My personal opinion is that forcing children to be born to parents who don't want children is a recipe for disaster. One of the largest responsibilities a human being can undertake shouldn't be reduced to "you must" because the condom slipped off banging some one night stand.

If you feel otherwise, being pro-choice allows you to do what your heart feels is right. Children cost money, money the pro-lifers ironically want no parts in doling out come social welfare program time.

My personal opinion is that forcing children to be born to parents who don't want children is a recipe for disaster. One of the largest responsibilities a human being can undertake shouldn't be reduced to "you must" because the condom slipped off banging some one night stand. If you feel otherwise, being pro-choice allows you to do what your heart feels is right. Children cost money, money the pro-lifers ironically want no parts in doling out come social welfare program time.

You know, I don't agree with you, but it's about time someone presented a rational argument in here for once besides "my opinion r fact lol". Kudos.

I wouldn't say I'm specifically pro-anything as much as I look at individual cases based on their merit. We really could nearly extinguish this debate within a generation by simply giving young people access to accurate information about reproduction and access to affordable and convenient contraception.

I never stated my opinions were facts, but that my opinions were derived from logical arguments. It's not that hard of a concept, but I don't expect a person who thinks that religious thought deserves respect in an alternative to a logical argument to understand in a million years. But wait, isn't the earth only 5 thousand years old?

You make the assumption that all religion is illogical. I'm religious and I believe that the earth is billions of years old, that the universe was possibly created by a big bang, and that evolution is a real thing. But I can't fault you for thinking everyone takes religious text 100% literally.

I wouldn't say I'm specifically pro-anything as much as I look at individual cases based on their merit. We really could nearly extinguish this debate within a generation by simply giving young people access to accurate information about reproduction and access to affordable and convenient contraception.

You make the assumption that all religion is illogical. I'm religious and I believe that the earth is billions of years old, that the universe was possibly created by a big bang, and that evolution is a real thing. But I can't fault you for thinking everyone takes religious text 100% literally.

Religion by it's definition is illogical. It's not an assumption. I understand why you take offense to it, but you're wrong.

Sorry, I already dismiss everything you say because you can't even back up any claims you make with actual data, no matter how much fact and logic and truth and science you seem to think your mind is filled with.

I didn't make any claims, but go ahead and remain ignorant.

Lets play a game: Which state has the highest teen pregnancy rates in the country?