Best Mythic Weapon And Why

I'm not sure if Blaze is just trolling or getting totally wooshed by the whole concept of this topic being subjective.

Rockin' "it's my 12.95" like it's goin' out of style

Not really. Which weapon is worth creating depends on what one finds valuable. There is real value in being able to play a job you like. There is also value in being able to play the job that you like while bringing something to the table.

In closing, it is really up to the group or the individual to decide what is appropriate for them/him/her.

Burtgang is not going to make your PLD desirable enough to put it on the front lines again, as it did pre-abyssea. Do not have any doubt that it will still be a sideline job unless SE changes the enmity cap.

Almace will allow you to pump out some impressive dmg in a lot of content. It can be spectacular in easier content, and mediocre in current high end game content. But it will still be better than burtgang.





This is a game after all.

This is where you're wrong.

An Almace paladin is less than half as potent as most offensive classes in this game.

God dammit, lol

Would have responded if you identified a specific event, but that is a blanket statement. I guess I've been trolled?

EDIT: I actually only solo in my PLD and RDM when I'm a bit tired of spamming Uko/victory smite/cata/resolution/shoha for a change of pace and diversity.

It's a blanket statement that just happens to be true. Paladin isn't designed for output, to be quite honest. Yeah it has high STR, but it's not a DD job, it's a tank job. It has other tools for enmity, other than it's DD prowess.

It really doesn't have anything to do with specific events. You'll find no bigger lover of Paladin in this game, but even I don't pretend its offensive output even compares to a real, honest to goodness damage dealer.

One handed jobs suffer in general, and taking away the tools other, better damage dealers get just leaves our output lacking.

So you're saying that in all scenarios PLD dmg output >50% of "most" other DD classes.

First,Specify which DD classes please. Then factor in playing style. When you find your median please post results.


Am I correct?

All of them.

Yeah that is basically what I'm saying... I'm not saying they'll lose a parse by 50%, but they aren't nearly as good as THE JOBS DESIGNED TO DEAL DAMAGE...

I retire from this discussion lol.
"Do Burtgang, but don't play PLD cuz it sucks".

At what point, or page, did you read "PLD >MOST DD" ?

Bye.

Conqueror is a massive(~20%) increase when you don't have COR rolls. Upheaval is actually stronger with Conqueror and AM3 than Ukko's if it isn't getting Blood Rage or Rouge roll + Champion's.

That said, Conqueror suffers more than most with maintaining AM3, so it mostly comes down to play style and efficiency, which is probably going to close the gap some.

Also, best MS zerg weapon!

Well you said pld pumps out "impressive dmg in a lot of content". I wouldn't classify weaker than most DD's as "impressive", sorry.

I don't think any of the universally accepted third-string DD would have much trouble edging out paladin pretty handily

Beastmaster, maybe? Thief and ninja would run circles around paladin

There are literally and exactly two job-restrictive events that exist currently. Those being Legion and Odin II. Discussions of which weapons are best for those two events are only relevant to players who participate or care to participate in these events.

In just about every other event you can go on virtually any job and be successful. Decide how you spend your time and what jobs you enjoy playing the most. Is being the most potent DPS class important to you? Then a mythic is a 500m gamble in the first place, and if you're the type that gts buttdevestated when nnew content or updates dethrone your job/weapon then mythics are probably not for you in the first place.

That aside, things like nagi and tupsimati are trashbin mythics and if you make one you'll be sorely disappointed.

Without disproportionate burden on other players and/or having to add additional members to your team? I disagree

No.

That's compelling, and completely untrue, but alright.

Inb4 Sylow wins PW with 18 PUPs.

Nagi and tupsi aren't even pretty, they're really the worst.

Nope, pretty sure they're both more useful than Murgleis.

Because some ppl would rather maximize your job, rather than your ability to do content better(when you can already clear every content in this game perfectly fine without a Mythic), if that answers your confusion.

Same reason why ppl want to solo Abyssea NM without atma on RDM, when they can solo with atma or duo to kill way faster.

If you think versatility > all, I'd argue that spending 600M on a DD mythic like Koga or Ryuno is inferior choice than spending 600M on 4 relic/empy for different jobs, From what I've heard Ryuno/Koga isn't drastic ahead of DRK WAR, in many situations even weaker, so why spend 600M on Ryuno/Koga when you can spend it on lv 99 rag then use rest of the money on 2nd and 3rd R/E for more versatility? Yagrush is certainly less gain than many other expensive weapons too. 600M you can have a WAR DRK with rag 99 and Ukon 99 to cover zerg+general DD situtions, plus a BRD with horn+harp 99 for support, that's way more useful/versatile than having one Koga SAM or Yagrush WHM but no horn/harp and can't cover zerg situations.

Murgleis at least is nice looking.

not even close, and considering how ***Murgleis is too that's saying a great deal.