[Dev] Nyzul Isle Assault Bug

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
Version 3.1
New Items
users online
Forum » FFXI » General » [Dev] Nyzul Isle Assault Bug
[Dev] Nyzul Isle Assault Bug
First Page 2 3 ... 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21
 Siren.Kalilla
VIP
Offline
Server: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: Kalila
Posts: 14552
By Siren.Kalilla 2012-07-21 09:42:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Aly I did have a question about that.

Most terms are widely known (like speed hack). Are we not allowed to say that even? Or is it just the name of the program?

---

I ask because this whole topic is about dat modding NPC names, which is also illegal.

I'm just not sure what we are allowed to discuss or not on something like this.
 Fenrir.Camiie
Offline
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: Camiie
Posts: 817
By Fenrir.Camiie 2012-07-21 09:46:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
SE was stupid for making this event the way they did. The players were stupid for asking SE for "hard content" in the first place. SE was stupid for not making proper adjustments. The players were stupid for using cheats that directly led to them getting game-breaking gear and thinking SE would let that go. Both sides should have known better. Now look at the mess you all made.
[+]
 Cerberus.Detzu
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: Detzu
Posts: 869
By Cerberus.Detzu 2012-07-21 09:48:23
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Asura.Echandra said: »
Asura.Ericka said: »
Bahamut.Bekisa said: »
Lakshmi.Xstatic said: »
BTW it was the japanese who was complaining about NAs getting nyzul gear.
This is how this has come to light

blame the idiots who posted a video of themselves doing it. Skip to about 11:50 in the video and you clearly see them using dat mods in /party then posting it for the world to see. No doubt these people will be on the list of those investigated by the STF. This video specifically is the one JP players pointed out.


Its always Asura..... Always......... *Sigh*

of course it was asura. go chroma?

edit: i forgot to say Lamps Lamps Lamps. IF they took out lamps and people STILL lost Nyzul, what would be the excuse then? Gear Floors? Custards?

PS3 players can't win. They'll find other excuses anyway.
 Cerberus.Tidis
MSPaint Winner
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: tidis
Posts: 3927
By Cerberus.Tidis 2012-07-21 09:55:22
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Mnkk said: »
OMG IVE BEEN BANNED
Don't get people's hopes up.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Mnkk
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 577
By Quetzalcoatl.Mnkk 2012-07-21 09:56:28
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Cerberus.Tidis said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Mnkk said: »
OMG IVE BEEN BANNED
Don't get people's hopes up.
O.O WHY ME
 Fenrir.Mariane
Offline
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: leo
Posts: 1766
By Fenrir.Mariane 2012-07-21 10:05:36
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Aly Saxena said: »
remember even though the bug mentions 3rd party tools, we cannot discuss the tools here.


just an fyi in case someone does mention :)

Even the cheating folks are doing themselves a disservice by mentioning any details about their "tools of trade" I suppose...
 Carbuncle.Lynxblade
Offline
Server: Carbuncle
Game: FFXI
user: Lynxblade
Posts: 1654
By Carbuncle.Lynxblade 2012-07-21 10:10:16
Link | Quote | Reply
 
nyzul isle ban = new salvage dupe ban?
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2012-07-21 11:03:21
Link | Quote | Reply
 
SE sure loves PR blunders don't they.
 Ragnarok.Taereon
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Halo4
Posts: 213
By Ragnarok.Taereon 2012-07-21 11:05:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Don't ban me, bro!
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2012-07-21 11:07:48
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Fenrir.Mariane said: »

I said they can easily watch any particular file they wish to.

Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Most IP's are dynamically assigned from ISP's, especially those on DSL. Also carrier grade NAT destroys that entire scheme you put in, as you now have 10+ clients connecting from the same external IP.

Track by IP is the absolute worst method you could ever attempt to use.

Anyone with IT expertize knows that dynamic IP assignment is no problem to track this since you're actually LOGGED to the PlayOnline service while you're updating your game. They take YOUR current IP and the date/time you updated the game *FROM POL LOGIN HISTORY* and cross with the update server logs to check WHICH files YOUR IP downloaded. If you re-downloaded the LAMP dats out of 35 THOUSAND files the likeliness of unintended corruption of those specific files is very low IMHO.

My point is: They CAN tell people who cheat apart from people who don't if they really want to.

Edit: Oh and we have an update next week. I have no intention to help cheaters, but whatever. It is not intentional if that is the effect of this post.

This is a long secondary conversation we could get into. Suffice to say, no it doesn't work that way, and yes they could change it to work that way but then we'd know about it and it would be trivial to work around. And then it would only attempt to catch people who have yet to modify their dats in the future, it would do nothing for those who have already done so in the past.

You connect to the update server, download a new has table, check the list of files for those hash's. If they match then no download is conducted, if they don't match then their marked for download. They are not now nor will attempt take apart that file to determine what changes were made, only that it doesn't match the new updated hash. No info is transmitted to the update server btw, its the update client that does the hash comparisons and composed the file list.

Your idea would actually ban every single player on update, not just the ones who modded their dats.

Now would you like me to get you a ruler or did you bring your own?
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2012-07-21 11:13:14
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Fenrir.Mariane said: »
Aly Saxena said: »
remember even though the bug mentions 3rd party tools, we cannot discuss the tools here.


just an fyi in case someone does mention :)

Even the cheating folks are doing themselves a disservice by mentioning any details about their "tools of trade" I suppose...

Dat mods have been mentioned time and time again. We've told SE about them and spoken at great length on the OF. Camate even asked about feedback regarding order lamps and that he would relay to the devs and see what they think. Their only making an issue due to the JP's going nuts over the posted NA videos.

Nothing to learn, move on.
 Leviathan.Draylo
Offline
Server: Leviathan
Game: FFXI
user: Draylo
By Leviathan.Draylo 2012-07-21 11:14:40
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Ragnarok.Taereon said: »
Don't ban me, bro!

All cheaters will be smited.
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2012-07-21 11:18:42
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Leviathan.Draylo said: »
Ragnarok.Taereon said: »
Don't ban me, bro!

All cheaters will be smited.

Or given an ultimatum to drop any Nyzul Uncharted gear and since this is SE we're talking about even the people who did 25 runs of 80 to complete an asterium would get caught up.

There's a storm coming citizens of Vana'diel.
 Bahamut.Mizuharu
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: Mizuharu
Posts: 1988
By Bahamut.Mizuharu 2012-07-21 11:39:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Pro-tip all you dat swapers...

Unapply the changes you did to the dats before the next update. And, so long as you didn't do like <t> in any form of chat, shouldn't have any hard evidence against you.

The revert dat change is just because when you update the game, server replaces any dats that don't match the servers. Just a safety net imo but still.
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2012-07-21 11:55:07
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Even funnier

http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxi/threads/18584-dev1048-%E3%82%A2%E3%82%B5%E3%83%AB%E3%83%88%E3%80%8C%E3%83%8A%E3%82%A4%E3%82%BA%E3%83%AB%E5%B3%B6%E6%9C%AA%E9%96%8B%E9%A0%98%E5%9F%9F%E8%B8%8F%E6%9F%BB%E6%8C%87%E4%BB%A4%E3%80%8D%E3%81%AB%E3%81%A4%E3%81%84%E3%81%A6?p=339241&viewfull=1#post339241

Slycer on BG did a clean translation of the CR response

Quote:
"Hello,

Generally speaking, we are currently researching the abuse and we will deal with it as an ongoing basis. The conditions and criteria for enforcement cannot vary by region and, by policy, we will carry out a unified response. Punishment will not be targeted to a specific region.

Please understand that we are unable to police [as in crackdown against or enforce against] general discussion regarding third party tools.

Regarding your comments about reporting and enforcing fraud, please use our "Special Task Force Report" form.

Thank you to our players who support us by playing the right way ["soundly"]."

This was in response to the JP's asking that only NA/EU be subject to banning. Seriously ... they actually suggested that and got a response.
 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2012-07-21 11:56:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Mizuharu said: »
Pro-tip all you dat swapers...

Unapply the changes you did to the dats before the next update. And, so long as you didn't do like <t> in any form of chat, shouldn't have any hard evidence against you.

The revert dat change is just because when you update the game, server replaces any dats that don't match the servers. Just a safety net imo but still.

Or just use the BG torrent updater. Replaced all the files and toggles the update bit so that it pass's initial check. Log in as though nothing ever happened.
[+]
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2012-07-21 11:58:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
All I see are asshurt JP PS2ers mad SE made an event they can't do, some NA/EU/JP cheated the system to win but said JP PS2ers are so blind they don't realize their own people cheat and thus punishment is a dish best served to gaijin.
[+]
 Cerberus.Tidis
MSPaint Winner
Offline
Server: Cerberus
Game: FFXI
user: tidis
Posts: 3927
By Cerberus.Tidis 2012-07-21 11:59:40
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Lol they actually asked for only NA/EU players to be punished, not too surprised tbh, the NNI gear is clearly JP onry.
[+]
 Quetzalcoatl.Darknano
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 78
By Quetzalcoatl.Darknano 2012-07-21 12:03:06
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Why people still on this forums you should be out there making Nyzul Isle runs x.x....
 Bismarck.Altar
Offline
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
user: altar1
Posts: 1676
By Bismarck.Altar 2012-07-21 12:03:57
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
JP's asking that only NA/EU be subject to banning.

wtf. nobody can be that stupid. need link to this for the lulz plz.
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2012-07-21 12:04:36
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Darknano said: »
Why people still on this forums you should be out there making Nyzul Isle runs x.x....

With or without the cheats on?
 Quetzalcoatl.Darknano
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
Posts: 78
By Quetzalcoatl.Darknano 2012-07-21 12:17:26
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Does it matter?
[+]
 Ragnarok.Sekundes
Offline
Server: Ragnarok
Game: FFXI
user: Sekundes
Posts: 4212
By Ragnarok.Sekundes 2012-07-21 12:22:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Lakshmi.Sparthosx said: »
Quetzalcoatl.Darknano said: »
Why people still on this forums you should be out there making Nyzul Isle runs x.x....

With or without the cheats on?
Tbh, I'd avoid doing nyzul with mods at this point just cause they seem to be cracking down on it...
 Quetzalcoatl.Milliniar
Offline
Server: Quetzalcoatl
Game: FFXI
user: Milliniar
Posts: 262
By Quetzalcoatl.Milliniar 2012-07-21 12:35:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
but what if i renamed the lamps but never actually did nyzul isle since to take advantage of it?
 Lakshmi.Sparthosx
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
user: sparthosx
Posts: 10394
By Lakshmi.Sparthosx 2012-07-21 12:39:20
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Quetzalcoatl.Darknano said: »
Does it matter?

There's a reason no one shouts this event and I'll give you a hint:

It's a waste of time.
 Fenrir.Mariane
Offline
Server: Fenrir
Game: FFXI
user: leo
Posts: 1766
By Fenrir.Mariane 2012-07-21 13:20:52
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Now would you like me to get you a ruler or did you bring your own?

Dude, they CAN LOG WHICH files your client download any time and god knows if they have not been doing that for years now ... It does not matter which files pass or not a hash check, I am talking about what files your client WILL DOWNLOAD.

If they do not update the lamp files but PUT THEM on the update list, the updater will check the file hashes and whomever has the legitimate files, the updater will not attempt to download them again.

What difficulty you have to understand that concept ? So they log WHICH files people downloaded when they updated and filter for these specific files. What is the mystery ?

Now who's going to hit the other's hand with a ruler ?
 Siren.Stunx
Offline
Server: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: Bungie
Posts: 903
By Siren.Stunx 2012-07-21 13:26:36
Link | Quote | Reply
 
there are still plenty groups who win nyzul with 3-5+ min left. those groups have nothing to worry about cept maybe a small dip in win percentage. anyone who has ever done lamp orders the real way in old school nyzul knows its fairly easy to do if you fully understand how they work. this will add 1-2min tops to lamp order.

buuuut i'm sure anyone who is in this boat already realizes this.
 Siren.Thoraeon
Offline
Server: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: Thoraeon
Posts: 2215
By Siren.Thoraeon 2012-07-21 13:27:53
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Fenrir.Mariane said: »
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Now would you like me to get you a ruler or did you bring your own?

Now who's going to hit the other's hand with a ruler ?

 Lakshmi.Saevel
Offline
Server: Lakshmi
Game: FFXI
Posts: 2228
By Lakshmi.Saevel 2012-07-21 13:30:10
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Fenrir.Mariane said: »
Lakshmi.Saevel said: »
Now would you like me to get you a ruler or did you bring your own?

Dude, they CAN LOG WHICH files your client download any time and god knows if they have not been doing that for years now ... It does not matter which files pass or not a hash check, I am talking about what files your client WILL DOWNLOAD.

If they do not update the lamp files but PUT THEM on the update list, the updater will check the file hashes and whomever has the legitimate files, the updater will not attempt to download them again.

What difficulty you have to understand that concept ? So they log WHICH files people downloaded when they updated and filter for these specific files. What is the mystery ?

Now who's going to hit the other's hand with a ruler ?

Didn't realize I was speaking to a minor. You'll understand the ruler reference after you hit puberty.

Trying to explain how the client side updater works is useless at this point in time. Your too angry for blood.
First Page 2 3 ... 6 7 8 ... 19 20 21