Strange. I am vaguely familiar with that face, yet have no recollection of playing that game. Might have to pick it up again sometime.
It's a good game, didn't really age well though.
You might find you have played it and just forgot, it's rather unremarkable aside from the battle system... I haven't actually beaten it yet but that monster appears very early on in a CS.
Why do people complain that a game 'has not aged well'? I don't understand the criticism at all, it's not supposed to be compared to the present, it's supposed to be compared against the technology available at the time of release.
Just because a brilliant game has become old it somehow becomes a worse game?
Edit: I can see how the term would apply to an evolving game like MMORPG titles which change over time, but single player, no.