Sometimes i feel like there are some functions in human cognition that are hard to describe. Like some unconscious perception other than the 5 senses.
For example, people can perceive when others are looking at them. Like when you walk in a street, then suddenly you move your head and notice someone else staring at you. Its not 100% accurate but does happen.
I wonder if thats a reaction to the staring action or to some mental focusing. It lead me to the conclusion that humans can have an incipient ability to repel and/or attract things/people with thoughts. Obviously that ability doesnt seems fully developed as its rare and inconsistent but maybe in some future generations that can be a thing
Sometimes i feel like there are some functions in human cognition that are hard to describe. Like some unconscious perception other than the 5 senses.
For example, people can perceive when others are looking at them. Like when you walk in a street, then suddenly you move your head and notice someone else staring at you. Its not 100% accurate but does happen.
I wonder if thats a reaction to the staring action or to some mental focusing. It lead me to the conclusion that humans can have an incipient ability to repel and/or attract things/people with thoughts. Obviously that ability doesnt seems fully developed as its rare and inconsistent but maybe in some future generations that can be a thing
Get your sister to send you this next time. Kraft came out with "Flavour Boosts" for Kraft Dinner. So far I've tried the butter chicken and cotton candy ones. The cotton candy is ~meh, but the butter chicken one is soo good :Q
The thing about reading a book is that the responsability of dissecting the ideas and reassemblying it in a way the reader can efficiently understand it is the readers themselves.
That responsability is what ive been running away. One reason because of the intensive cost of effort, concentration and time required to actively read.
And the second reason because i never seriously thought in which way the ideas can be structured such as i can have the optimal understanding of it.
Also, im not even sure if that kinda of topic is commonly discussed. For sure teachers never taught how to actually read above the level of distinguishing symbols, combining words and understanding basic semantic.
There is a world of techniques, approaches and considerations to fully comprehend a book that can easily be ignored by most, or just staying in the subconscious lv because probably its that much effort either to learn as to teach it, so most just ignore it.
The best-case scenario is a studio taking a movie that had good ideas but poor execution and trying again with the execution. The problem is that most studios go for remakes of stuff that already had the execution down.
The problem with Space Jam is that it was already a vehicle for marketing. And the extra problem with its sequel is most of the screen time was devoted to Warner Bros. flailing their metaphorical junk around, showing off how many IPs they own. And they didn't do it in any creative or fun ways, they just basically gave the audience a list of their properties. It's the movie equivalent of a résumé.
This is a thread that I found on another website I post at. It can be really really interesting. I thought it deserved a place here.
Post your random thoughts for the day here, or anything else that intrigues you.
For starters, is it possible to give constructive critism to someone who doesn't have a neck? I totally just walked by a girl who didn't. Someone isn't getting a necklace for Valentines day!
And who decided black and white can't be colors? I want to say a racist. I really do.