Random Thoughts.....What Are You Thinking?
|
You must be logged in to do that.
Random Thoughts.....What are you thinking?
Also Henry Fonda's 108th birthday.
get a ps3 and youl have most of our pawns entering ya
Phoenix.Josiahfk said: » I remember back in the day I used to understand some of Leon's posts. Man those were the days Bismarck.Magnuss said: » Simpler times, Josi. Now they're either obscure pictures of Pokemanz or threads from 4chan.  Bismarck.Dracondria said: » OZC are so slow @.@ It would appear they've finished doing the 08th MS Team memorial box, though, so that gives me something to download while I wait for SEED HD. :I Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » Bismarck.Leonkasai said: » Carbuncle.Skulloneix said: » ***....Leon, I clicked on your remastered Vid........you know how much I love SEED. >_<!!!!! Zeta....AAHHH CHOICES!!!!!!!!!!!!! STAP! Edit: War in the Pocket, and 08th MS Team, too, if you count OVAs. Edit edit: And G Gundam.
[+]
Bismarck.Leonkasai said: » Wing. Turn A. 00. AGE. Edit: War in the Pocket, and 08th MS Team, too, if you count OVAs. Ohhh Bright......so sad to see you....remembering your fate....\
BRB, gonna go kick Ques Paraya in the face...again... Does anyone happen to know off the top of their heads which album Strawberry Fields Forever is off of?
Strawberry Fields Forever" was intended for the album Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967), as it was the first song recorded for it, but was instead released in February 1967 as a double A-side single with Paul McCartney's "Penny Lane".
Bismarck.Moonlightespada said: » Strawberry Fields Forever" was intended for the album Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band (1967), as it was the first song recorded for it, but was instead released in February 1967 as a double A-side single with Paul McCartney's "Penny Lane". No wonder I can't find it. It's off an EP sorta thingy and not an official album :< Well I suppose I'll just toss that one into the "singles" folder. Bleh, apparently OZC is chopping the SEED Blu-ray release so the dub still fits. *** that... wonder if the blu-ray came with subs...
The only thing about that movie that looks good,is that it has GlaDos' voice. But APPARENTLY thats only in the trailer,and not the full movie :<
Quiznor said: » The only thing about that movie that looks good,is that it has GlaDos' voice. But APPARENTLY thats only in the trailer,and not the full movie :< Quote: Good news. I figured what that thing you just incinerated did. It was a morality core they installed after I flooded the Enrichment Center with a deadly neurotoxin, to make me stop flooding the Enrichment Center with a deadly neurotoxin. So get comfortable while I warm up the neurotoxin emitters.
[+]
uhg.. havnt seen a plasm farming shout all day, well since ive been off work ;/
So I have a question for Vita owners.
Does the vita use any particular proprietary discs or cartridges like the UMD? Or are all games purchased for it simply "downloaded"? I'm curious as to what is inside retail packages of vita games since there doesn't seem to be any sort of optical drive slot or anything of the like aside from its proprietary SD slot. Artemicion said: » So I have a question for Vita owners. Does the vita use any particular proprietary discs or cartridges like the UMD? Or are all games purchased for it simply "downloaded"? I'm curious as to what is inside retail packages of vita games since there doesn't seem to be any sort of optical drive slot or anything of the like aside from its proprietary SD slot. Uses both a proprietary memory card and game card. Alot of anger over the memory card in particular because they're slower and considerably more expensive than they should be. Especially when the game cards are designed to be written onto originally. Alot of games wont even boot up unless you have a memory card inserted too. There are seperate slots for the memory card,game card,and sim card if using a 3G sim Quiznor said: » Artemicion said: » So I have a question for Vita owners. Does the vita use any particular proprietary discs or cartridges like the UMD? Or are all games purchased for it simply "downloaded"? I'm curious as to what is inside retail packages of vita games since there doesn't seem to be any sort of optical drive slot or anything of the like aside from its proprietary SD slot. Uses both a proprietary memory card and game card. Alot of anger over the memory card in particular because they're slower and considerably more expensive than they should be. Especially when the game cards are designed to be written onto originally. Alot of games wont even boot up unless you have a memory card inserted too. There are seperate slots for the memory card,game card,and sim card if using a 3G sim Yeah, I am not happy with the direction Sony took with that. I get so many mixed signals with them when it comes to their devices. PS3 had the freedom of using local storage via laptop hard drives, while handhelds were forced with their own lame brand of overpriced storage. The ideal move to make IMO would be to have it operate on the most prolific flash memory protocol and let all vita games be downloaded accordingly. In such a case as what they're doing now, it feels there is little to no purpose or practicality in physical copies, as much as I prefer them. I didnt mind the pro duo for psp since flash memory was pretty new at the time,or even the UMD to an extent (other than being a fail optical media) but the vita memory card is offensive in both price/capacity and obligation
Quiznor said: » I didnt mind the pro duo for psp since flash memory was pretty new at the time,or even the UMD to an extent (other than being a fail optical media) but the vita memory card is offensive in both price/capacity and obligation Aye, I kept thinking to myself: "Where's the 64/128 GB cards? What!? $80 for a 32 GB? GTFO." As much as I love physical copies, I find them becoming less and less practical, especially in regards to handheld consoles. Yeah it is a bit fiendish to bottleneck users into a forced internet connected download, but I figure the compromise is if you let them use local storage in the format and size they prefer, once it is installed, there's no reason to be connected anymore unless one is using said services/features therein. compasity? my *** lol i have a 32gig card >.>
Bismarck.Moonlightespada said: » compasity? my *** lol i have a 32gig card >.> Even on my android phone, 32 GB feels like this..  So I can only imagine how tiny that'd feel on a device designed to archive relatively high capacity/HD games. I cant even remember what I have in mine,I think its an 8 or 16gb. The 32/64 werent released here on release day,and when they did come out,nowhere stocked them because they're offensively expensive. Itwas 130 euro for a 64gb card............that just isnt *** right at all
Artemicion said: » Bismarck.Moonlightespada said: » compasity? my *** lol i have a 32gig card >.> Even on my android phone, 32 GB feels like this.. So I can only imagine how tiny that'd feel on a device designed to archive relatively high capacity/HD games. The games are not HD. Look into it,you'll find that other than blind fanboys,it isnt HD. qHD is below the HD standard. Sony wont refer to it as a HD platform because they know its false advertizing and wont get sued. There are only 2 instances of "HD" being in vita game titles. One of which has a legit reason,the other was changed shortly after release Quiznor said: » I cant even remember what I have in mine,I think its an 8 or 16gb. The 32/64 werent released here on release day,and when they did come out,nowhere stocked them because they're offensively expensive. Itwas 130 euro for a 64gb card............that just isnt *** right at all Despite having a "hardware check" feature requiring a memory card to operate the game card, how many games would you say operate independently on the game card as opposed to partial card install? Artemicion said: » Quiznor said: » I cant even remember what I have in mine,I think its an 8 or 16gb. The 32/64 werent released here on release day,and when they did come out,nowhere stocked them because they're offensively expensive. Itwas 130 euro for a 64gb card............that just isnt *** right at all Despite having a "hardware check" feature requiring a memory card to operate the game card, how many games would you say operate independently on the game card as opposed to partial card install? There is a list of them out there,I think there are 6 games last I checked that worked without a memory card Edit: Its not even a partial install,thats the even more ghetto thing. It installs a tiny (usually less than 1mb) base data,thats it My mistake. 960 x 544 is indeed not HD. But nevertheless, I can imagine that vita games are a bit higher in capacity than their predecessors, which ironically enabled significantly larger and cheaper storage options than what is available for the vita.
eh i have alot of psp and ps1 games on mine <they need to make FFV vita compatable.. every other one is ._.> they need to have a 3rd pt make a 260g or something, vita game wise are way to *** big for a small card
Is there a function or feature to do a full game card/disc install to the memory card? Would much prefer to have my games present within the device than to carry around multiple game cards depending on my mood or preferences.
|
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2026 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.