I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
So anything that results in the death of the child is ok but hurting the child and keeping it alive is not ok. The uncle should of just knocked the kid onto a knife or something. Accidents happen.
Okay, I'll admit the general circumstance of that tragedy was more or less an accident. It was within a controlled environment and what appeared to be a trained professional. However, because of the type of firearm it was and there being laws against children using them in the first place, it was essentially willful neglect or endangerment that caused the boy's life to end.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
So i guess if he was letting his 8 year old drive his car and the kid ran over and killed a few people that would be no ones fault either because he was just teaching the kid to drive and accidents happen lol
cars have an age limit for a reason (didn't see the part of that gun having one) I live in VA, there isn't that many gun laws here
Okay, I'll admit the general circumstance of that tragedy was more or less an accident. It was within a controlled environment and what appeared to be a trained professional. However, because of the type of firearm it was and there being laws against children using them in the first place, it was essentially willful neglect or endangerment that caused the boy's life to end.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
Okay, I'll admit the general circumstance of that tragedy was more or less an accident. It was within a controlled environment and what appeared to be a trained professional. However, because of the type of firearm it was and there being laws against children using them in the first place, it was essentially willful neglect or endangerment that caused the boy's life to end.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
that happens all the time, and it's better than hitting and permanently scaring your children. Last I checked humility isn't abuse.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
that happens all the time, and it's better than hitting and permanently scaring your children. Last I checked humility isn't abuse.
i'd rather be hit a few times than have those other things taken away
So I bought this nice Uzi and letting my kid play around with it. He's dead now but it's not my fault, it was the recoil.
he wasn't playing with it, he was shooting it at a target, there's a big difference.
***happens.
Can we at least aggre that it was irresponsible for the Dad to have his kid use an uzi (***happens or otherwize) Jetackuu?
considering it was against the law, obviously.
I would let a child use one, at that age, probably not. Mostly due to the fact that they can't handle the recoil (obviously) or at least it would have been a mounted weapon. In this case more precautions could have been made, for starters not breaking the law.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
that happens all the time, and it's better than hitting and permanently scaring your children. Last I checked humility isn't abuse.
i'd rather be hit a few times than have those other things taken away
well your personal choice doesn't really matter, some people would rather take a bullet than getting their phone taken away, it doesn't mean it's right.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Well beings it's illegal, there's lots of people who can tell your kid what he can and can't shoot.
Ninja edit: Watch the clip. It states that it was illegal for the kid to fire the weapon.
ah it was then? (sorry didn't watch the whole thing) then yeah he should be tried for negligible homicide. What area was that in?
2:10ish in the video. It's illegal for children to fire machine guns in that state.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
that happens all the time, and it's better than hitting and permanently scaring your children. Last I checked humility isn't abuse.
i'd rather be hit a few times than have those other things taken away
well your personal choice doesn't really matter, some people would rather take a bullet than getting their phone taken away, it doesn't mean it's right.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
So anything that results in the death of the child is ok but hurting the child and keeping it alive is not ok. The uncle should of just knocked the kid onto a knife or something. Accidents happen.
accidents do happen, if this weren't a case of neglect it would be fine.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
that happens all the time, and it's better than hitting and permanently scaring your children. Last I checked humility isn't abuse.
i'd rather be hit a few times than have those other things taken away
well your personal choice doesn't really matter, some people would rather take a bullet than getting their phone taken away, it doesn't mean it's right.
i'd say it is
based on their opinion it is right
who are you to say otherwise
opinions don't make things right/wrong, sorry to tell you.
it's still child abuse regardless of your, my or anyone else's opinion on the matter
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
that happens all the time, and it's better than hitting and permanently scaring your children. Last I checked humility isn't abuse.
i'd rather be hit a few times than have those other things taken away
well your personal choice doesn't really matter, some people would rather take a bullet than getting their phone taken away, it doesn't mean it's right.
i'd say it is
based on their opinion it is right
who are you to say otherwise
opinions don't make things right/wrong, sorry to tell you.
it's still child abuse regardless of your, my or anyone else's opinion on the matter
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
so you provide them with food, a home, and clothing but as soon as you strike them it's abuse and you're getting thrown in jail and having your child taken away from you
isn't there something wrong with this picture?
maybe an alternative to this "abuse" would be to feed them bread and water and give them the plainest things without anything rewarding them in the house
that happens all the time, and it's better than hitting and permanently scaring your children. Last I checked humility isn't abuse.
i'd rather be hit a few times than have those other things taken away
well your personal choice doesn't really matter, some people would rather take a bullet than getting their phone taken away, it doesn't mean it's right.
i'd say it is
based on their opinion it is right
who are you to say otherwise
opinions don't make things right/wrong, sorry to tell you.
it's still child abuse regardless of your, my or anyone else's opinion on the matter
Source proving that please.
A forum thread doesn't count as a source unless there's objective fact in it.
It depends on your kid. Corporal punishment shouldn't be the very 1st thing you use to teach your kid a lesson but one of the tools. Some kids you will never need to hit them because they would easily learn from their own mistakes and never do it again. Some kids tho are *** hard headed and do it again and again and again. Example, School calls and your kid skip a class. You wait for him to get home, see his friends for the class he missed (get homework) sit with him (give him a talk about what he is doing is wrong, etc) help him with his homework then give him some sort of restriction (grounded, take away his wtv thing he loves) 2nd, 3rd time. School calls and ask if you approved your kid going home early because of (lets say doctor reason, dental wtv) "so he made a fake note" Your kid gets home and tells you that it was a half day and they let him come home early. 1) he lied to you 2) You have approached him multiple times about this yet he is still doing it At this point. I want feedback what would you do to discipline your kid? Without the need of Smacking sense into him.
resorting to violence only shows a weakness on your part and quite frankly only teaches them to solve their problems through violence, something you should never teach a child
Just a question here Jet. Isn't resorting to name calling and disrespectful attitude a sign of weakness as well? Just teaches people there's no use in having a respectful conversation and teaches others to call other people disrepectful names and treat them in the same manner.
Why don't you take your own advice and apply it to your life.
I just don't see how the dam father is not on trial too he must know some one. The dirty sob need to take responsibility for his son death instead of trying to pass the blame. I hope he commits suicide from the guilt but I assume he think some how the person who held the expo is to blame although he was the one who let his kid fire the weapons...
because he did nothing wrong, nobody did. accidents happen.
letting an 8 year old shoot an uzi isn't the right thing to do
says who?
who are you to tell them what their kid can and can't shoot?
like I said if there was a regulation on this that would be a different story, as far as I know there currently isn't and there shouldn't be. ***happens, misfires happen, recoils happen.
Who are you to say someone can't whip the kid they have guardianship of with a belt?
because it's child abuse
and an 8 year old having access to an uzi is child endangerment, not an accident.