NJ Legislation Bans TSA Scanners + More

What would thus reasoning be?

the words "or otherwise" was tagged on at the end of my sentence for a reason.
what would thus be asking?
would thus be able to thus ask thus questions in thus better format thus?

and did you ignore the rest of my post?
-_-
you and your shenanigans.

Context sure is important. Penetrate can have several meanings I'll give you that, but not in this context.

As those laws are written it explicitly means penetrating an orifice of the body and would fail to prevent the pat downs people are experiencing now.

If the TSA was doing cavity searches on children then we'd have something to talk about, but I haven't heard anything of that sort.

exactly.
not that their other shenanigans shouldn't be questioned lol.

just don't think child penetration should be the spear point of an investigation.

So you were confused on the physical sticking part or the sticking part?

the part where you just typed a bunch of word and hit submit.

rather than replying to what i said.
whoo lets do more answer questions with more questions!

i'll stop the witty banter if you actually reply to things I say as a whole :/

actually no i won't
i like witty banter, at least i know you think i'm witty :D

I would remove the word orifice as the law does not contain that word.

well it's a jersey law, what do you expect?

on that note, since this isn't really a discussion at this point, i'm going to watch some videos and enjoy my night :D, might be back at a later time, hope this conversation has progressed further.

Now if only they can get rid of Jersey Shore.

I'm happy to say I've never seen that show. I only ever hear bad things so that won't change anytime soon!

weeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee woooooooooooooooooooo

Yeah, it just says sexual penetration. Not just penetration. Since we're doing definitions:

haters gonna hate . JPG
:P

i dont quite understand this question.

1 kojo is right. an insurance company wont issue a new policy if a person has a preexisting condition that would make them a high risk for early death. cancer is certainly one of those that would not get issued.

2 kojo is also right that if the customer didnt disclose the preexisting cancer and then died the company would not pay the claim. there may be clauses like a statue of limitations where after having the policy for more than 2 years and then dieing of the health problem, they would pay the claim. also if the policy is small enough they might just pay it and not investigate.

3 life insurance on a cancer patient is absolutely beneficial to the beneficiary of the cancer patient.

4 there are many people with cancer that have life insurance. if a healthy person gets life insurance and then gets cancer then they would be insane to cancel it. the insurance company can not disqualify them from coverage if they become deathly sick after they initial medical screening is good and the policy is issued. if they could do that it would be like your car insurance company canceling on you after you report having an accident and not paying out.

you seem to be trying hard to prove kojo right.
my grandfather had life insurance BEFORE he had cancer.
ended up getting cancer and we received compensation for his funeral stuff.

you saw what this question was referred towards in the first place.
referring to my question about mab who was inferring that life insurance wasn't useful.
it might not be the most useful for EVERYONE but that's not what the question posed.
it's a pretty straight forward answer, I just wanted to know the reasoning behind that choice of words.
maybe my mock-wording of "beneficial" was misleading to you.
but it's not like every cancer patient doesn't have life insurance.
on the flip-side how screwed over would the people that had a plan set up prior to getting cancer if they happened to lose it :/
There's always pro's and con's and there are a lot more pro's with life insurance than there are with everything that is TSA, sound better?

IN A GALAXY FAR AWAY...................

STAR WARS.

Sorry just reminded me.

far far away, get it right.

New Jersey could soon become the epicenter of the growing controversy over the new Transportation Security Administration (TSA) passenger screening procedures being implemented at airports nationwide.

I have no real qualms with Obama but he should have picked better for his Homeland security chief...

Ok so I just sent out a bunch of emails to politicians, including Doherty here asking what is being done and when the next relevant date on the progression of this will be. I will post any information I receive.

nice, it's about time those republicans are good for something.

True that.
My house of representatives official is republican too, lol. He's been in office since I can remember.

Jet was apparently nowhere to be found when the Republicans were blocking Obama's nominees to head the TSA. Here's a little hint if you actually try to research anything before posting: Pistole was the third nominee.

Really more rate downs for sending emails to politicians?

LOL I say!

I don't care if you rate down NJ, like anyone hasn't been doing this for years, but if you're such a tough guy write your congressmen an email then.

They rated down every post on this page I think, didn't check the others. Someone is having fun with ratings though.

GDI Darki knock it off.

:P

So far just a little spam, lol. (fixed)

Definitely can trust them cause they're from Canada.