|
Obama's 2015 Budget May End Sequester
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-04-21 14:33:14
Where do you live that you can get a $40k/yr job WITHOUT a college degree? Entry level, obviously. San Antonio, Texas.
Heck, you can get an associates degree in various fields and make 50-60k a year. You just need to know what professions there are that require a basic minimum of knowledge in the field.
Oil Field operators can make 50k a year and not need a degree at all. Construction also. Plumbing can get you about 45k a year with just a certificate.
There are many jobs down here that are available, but it isn't a cushy CEO position, so not that many people are willing to work for it...
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3618
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-04-21 14:36:50
Where do you live that you can get a $40k/yr job WITHOUT a college degree? Entry level, obviously. Most skilled trades fall into this category, though they often have apprenticeship programs and the like if you plan to be part of the local pipe- layers -- sorry, pipe- fitters -- union or whatever.
What do you do with someone who doesn't want to do a skilled trade, though? I interviewed today to help run the safety department in a factory, which would enlist both my computer and clerical skills along with my array of blue collar work. My woeful little liberal arts degree actually helps a lot with that.
I do wish people would learn the difference between a liberal arts BA and a fine arts BFA, by the way.
Server: Asura
Game: FFXI
Posts: 34187
By Asura.Kingnobody 2014-04-21 14:39:33
My woeful little liberal arts degree actually helps a lot with that. In most cases, just having a degree is good enough for grunt work.
Mind you, I highly doubt a CEO out there has a Bachelor's in English as their only degree (maybe a side degree, but not only degree).
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3618
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-04-21 14:43:29
BA in English is a starting point. A CEO would very likely go on to pick up a Master's of some nature or another, generally much more specific to his industry or job. And that's the way it ought to be: a bachelor's degree proves you can learn, a master's degree shows what you do best.
It's why pre-law and pre-medicine and bachelor's of business administration are such worthless degrees: if you're going to be serious with those fields, you're going to have to be re-taught once you go to the real school.
And then there's the truly worthless crap. I've met so many people with communications degrees who literally cannot tell me what a communications degree is.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-04-21 14:46:29
My woeful little liberal arts degree actually helps a lot with that. In most cases, just having a degree is good enough for grunt work. Mind you, I highly doubt a CEO out there has a Bachelor's in English as their only degree (maybe a side degree, but not only degree).
Maybe it's the location. Skilled workers around here, even if they make money commensurate to what I do (they frequently do not), get treated like absolute dogshit.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3618
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-04-21 14:50:27
Maybe it's the location. Skilled workers around here, even if they make money commensurate to what I do (they frequently do not), get treated like absolute dogshit. Can you elaborate? I live in a city that has been declared one of the most intelligent communities on the planet but we have a ton of blue collar work (the city is built around several shipping hubs) and, as someone who does blue collar work, I never hear or see crap, especially not for the *** plumbers making $70k+ a year.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-04-21 14:51:40
BA in English is a starting point. A CEO would very likely go on to pick up a Master's of some nature or another, generally much more specific to his industry or job. And that's the way it ought to be: a bachelor's degree proves you can learn, a master's degree shows what you do best. It's why pre-law and pre-medicine and bachelor's of business administration are such worthless degrees: if you're going to be serious with those fields, you're going to have to be re-taught once you go to the real school. And then there's the truly worthless crap. I've met so many people with communications degrees who literally cannot tell me what a communications degree is.
I've got a BA in journalism, secondary major in history.
I actually have one of the jobs KN mentioned where I got my foot in the door via my bachelor's for rank-and-file work.
I can't imagine trying to get a job without a degree or at least technical skills training at this point.
Bismarck.Ramyrez
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-04-21 14:54:00
Maybe it's the location. Skilled workers around here, even if they make money commensurate to what I do (they frequently do not), get treated like absolute dogshit. Can you elaborate? I live in a city that has been declared one of the most intelligent communities on the planet but we have a ton of blue collar work (the city is built around several shipping hubs) and, as someone who does blue collar work, I never hear or see crap, especially not for the *** plumbers making $70k+ a year.
I live in semi-rural Pennsylvania (about 40 miles from Pittsburgh).
Unless you're self-employed, everything around here is shutting down. Employers in construction and similar skilled trades have their choice of workers and the less skilled a job is, the more people are willing to do it, so costs are certainly kept down for employers. Some unions are around, sure, but there's an equal number of people that get paid job-by-job with no job security with no representation.
Edit: also, I quoted the wrong post with that response, but you get the idea.
Edit2: I readily admit my evidence is all anecdotal coming from the people I know, stories from friends and relatives and hearing the stories of those with whom I work. But when no one is saying anything good, that's got to be indicative of something.
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3618
By Shiva.Onorgul 2014-04-21 15:06:37
Hmm... is that like the Latrobe area or even further out? When I lived in PGH, I dated a guy in Latrobe and that place was basically lots of nothing, poverty, and the Rolling Rock brewery, and that was back in 2001. I wouldn't be surprised that it has gotten worse.
But, yeah, living in a major city seems to be the difference. You won't see high-powered lawyers rubbing shoulders with bricklayers, but both jobs are given due respect.
By fonewear 2014-04-21 15:29:30
I have a degrees in feminism it is useless but the women seem to like it.
I minored in racism it pays much more.
[+]
Bismarck.Ramyrez
Server: Bismarck
Game: FFXI
Posts: 4746
By Bismarck.Ramyrez 2014-04-21 16:04:19
Hmm... is that like the Latrobe area or even further out? When I lived in PGH, I dated a guy in Latrobe and that place was basically lots of nothing, poverty, and the Rolling Rock brewery, and that was back in 2001. I wouldn't be surprised that it has gotten worse.
But, yeah, living in a major city seems to be the difference. You won't see high-powered lawyers rubbing shoulders with bricklayers, but both jobs are given due respect.
Creepy as it is, yes. You hit it spot on. I live in Latrobe. Well, Unity Township. Nice enough place, but ***for jobs for your average Joe. Though, ironically enough, my wife and I live here because our jobs are here.
It's a decisive election year, so you know what that means? Budget talks!
Quote: President Barack Obama's fiscal 2015 budget request would boost U.S. tax revenue by nearly $1.4 trillion over 10 years if fully enacted, cutting deficits by $1.05 trillion while funding new spending, the Congressional Budget Office said on Thursday.
The current administration goes on to say:
Quote: It proposes to boost revenue by limiting tax breaks for wealthy Americans and businesses, imposing a new tax on millionaires, raising tobacco taxes, and restoring estate and gift taxes to their previously higher, 2009 levels.
At the same time, it would boost spending by expanding cash tax credits for low-income Americans, canceling the "sequester" automatic spending cuts to military and domestic programs, and increasing funds for job training programs, among other changes. Source
However the Congressional Budget Office has voiced concern over this budget:
Quote: There is virtually no chance that Congress will advance Obama's plan in its entirety. But the CBO's latest analysis will feed campaign messaging by both Democrats and Republicans ahead of congressional elections in November.
The analysis compares Obama's request to a new "baseline" estimate that CBO released last week that assumes no changes to current tax and spending laws.
Republicans though are focused on cutting spending:
Quote: Republicans, who last week in the House of Representatives passed an austere, 10-year balanced budget plan with deep domestic spending cuts and no tax increases, will focus their criticism on tax hikes in Obama's plan. Democrats, who are basing their re-election campaigns on efforts to reduce the gap between rich and poor, are expected to highlight Obama's proposals to aid the middle class and the poor.
The CBO analysis shows that Obama's budget plan would increase deficits slightly relative to current law in fiscal 2014 and 2015, with deficits just above $500 billion in both years. Source
So in a way both the CBO and House Republicans agree that this new budget will only further increase the national deficit (and consequently the national debt).
However, it was stated in the previous article:
Quote: Obama's budget plan is loaded with new policy changes, including an assumption that sweeping immigration reforms are enacted, producing a net 10-year deficit reduction of $158 billion.
But Republicans are trying to do just that:
Quote: House Speaker John Boehner and his Republican leadership team are telling donors and industry groups that they want to pass immigration legislation this year, despite the reluctance of other party members to tackle the divisive issue before the November elections.
Many lawmakers and activists have assumed the issue was off the table in an election year. But Boehner, R-Ohio, said at a recent Las Vegas fundraiser that he was "hell-bent on getting this done this year," two people in the room told The Wall Street Journal. Source
So that begs the question: Will any of this work? Or is it just talk for an election year in which nothing will get done once the elections are over with?
Is this just a round about way of increasing military spending, while simultaneously projecting the notion of reducing military spending at the same time?
Thoughts?
|
|