Libs really think the yearbook serves as some kind of evidence? For what? Even if it was Moore, all it means is that he wrote some flattering words about a teenage girl 40 years ago.
ZOMG guise, total smoking gun, the only people who write flattering things to teenage girls are people who rape them.
Sexual assault isn't some fad people go through. Does anyone know the odds on how many sexual predators just suddenly stop abusing in their 30s and sail through to their 70s without any other incidents? We're talking huge, huge long shot. Way more likely that a liberal paper who didn't give two shits about a countless liberal politicians, sees an opportunity to smear their political rivals. If this guy was a predator, he would have recent victims, and they would be actual evidence of something instead of the left's self indulgent circle jerk into new-age McCarthyism.
There isn't enough polish for this turd on the planet to make it do what you want it to do.
Plus, Gloria Allred, notorious camwhore. As in will do anything for fame, just ask Kathy Griffin.