I would argue that the clause regarding not discussing salary or compensation, or requiring abiding by a handbook/rules which forbid discussing of salary or compensation, is probably pretty prevalent, despite being invalid.
So is any language claiming that employees do not have the right to unionize.
[UK] Judge Orders Father To Take His Children To Church
|
Forum » Everything Else »
Politics and Religion
»
[UK] Judge orders father to take his children to church
[UK] Judge orders father to take his children to church
Bahamut.Milamber said: » I would argue that the clause regarding not discussing salary or compensation, or requiring abiding by a handbook/rules which forbid discussing of salary or compensation, is probably pretty prevalent, despite being invalid. So is any language claiming that employees do not have the right to unionize. I agree about discussing compensation, and I'd put morals clauses in there as well for people who are outside of the public eye. The expressed right to unionize is a bit outside of what I'd agree with, but the right to collectively bargain and settle greavences should be federal law. Odin.Jassik said: » Bahamut.Milamber said: » I would argue that the clause regarding not discussing salary or compensation, or requiring abiding by a handbook/rules which forbid discussing of salary or compensation, is probably pretty prevalent, despite being invalid. So is any language claiming that employees do not have the right to unionize. I agree about discussing compensation, and I'd put morals clauses in there as well for people who are outside of the public eye. The expressed right to unionize is a bit outside of what I'd agree with, but the right to collectively bargain and settle greavences should be federal law. Collective bargaining is essentially unionizing, just without the negative connotations the concepts of unions have in the US. sent PM.
Asura.Kingnobody said: » Shiva.Onorgul said: » And the rather small number of contracts I've signed in my life (primarily rental contracts) have included provisos that I happily ignored because they violated state laws and city statutes. It's naive to pretend every contract is flawlessly combed through by a neutral attorney, which would be the standard necessary. |
All FFXIV and FFXI content and images © 2002-2024 SQUARE ENIX CO., LTD.
FINAL FANTASY is a registered trademark of Square Enix Co., Ltd.