Random Politics & Religion #00

Eorzea Time
 
 
 
Language: JP EN FR DE
Version 3.1
New Items
users online
Forum » Everything Else » Politics and Religion » Random Politics & Religion #00
Random Politics & Religion #00
First Page 2 3 ... 1020 1021 1022 ... 1375 1376 1377
 Siren.Mosin
Offline
Server: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: BKiddo
By Siren.Mosin 2015-10-09 16:01:58
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
If you don't have an army, you are better off not resisting. Unless you really want to die.

when did our hypothetical 'lives' become more important than our hypothetical 'freedom'?

aslo I think Aeyela just wants to disarm us so he / she can get us back under the queens' boot-heel.
[+]
 Valefor.Sehachan
Guide Maker
Offline
Server: Valefor
Game: FFXI
user: Seha
Posts: 24219
By Valefor.Sehachan 2015-10-09 16:03:10
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I say let's go back to medieval times, where every castle has its personal share of knights and bannermen.

EACH CITY FOR ITSELF *builds walls*
Offline
By Aeyela 2015-10-09 16:03:33
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Siren.Mosin said: »
when did our hypothetical 'lives' become more important than our hypothetical 'freedom'?

aslo I think Aeyela just wants to disarm us so he / she can get us back under the queens boot-heel.

Your sugars, tobaccos and spices are ***. We're not interested!
[+]
 Siren.Mosin
Offline
Server: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: BKiddo
By Siren.Mosin 2015-10-09 16:05:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
just what I would say if I was planning on re-acquiring an old asset that was taken from me...
Offline
By Aeyela 2015-10-09 16:06:49
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Siren.Mosin said: »
just what I would say if I was planning on re-acquiring an old asset that was taken from me...

We'll ask Putin for help and when 26 fine Soviet brand cruise missiles are fired on you, perhaps some will accidentally on purpose land on Scotland.
[+]
 Siren.Mosin
Offline
Server: Siren
Game: FFXI
user: BKiddo
By Siren.Mosin 2015-10-09 16:14:24
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I'm all talk anyway. I'm teaching my kids chinese right now so when they take over america we'll be able to kiss *** in their language, possibly securing myself a sheriff position or something.

Insurrection is a young man's game.
[+]
Forum Moderator
Offline
Server: Excalibur
Game: FFXIV
user: AnnaMolly
Posts: 25981
By Anna Ruthven 2015-10-09 16:23:22
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Siren.Mosin said: »
I'm all talk anyway. I'm teaching my kids chinese right now so when they take over america we'll be able to kiss *** in their language, possibly securing myself a sheriff position or something.

Insurrection is a young man's game.
President Trump won't let that happen.
 Bahamut.Milamber
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
user: milamber
Posts: 3691
By Bahamut.Milamber 2015-10-10 06:12:32
Link | Quote | Reply
 
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34494856
This little tidbit buried in the bottom...
Quote:
In another development on Friday, the US announced it would end efforts to train new Syrian rebel forces and instead shift to providing equipment and weapons to existing forces.
Its $500m (£326m) programme had aimed to train and equip 5,400 fighters this year and a further 15,000 in 2016.
However, it emerged last month that only four or five of the fighters were in Syria.
It was also revealed that US-trained rebels had handed vehicles and ammunition over to militants.
A senior administration official said the programme was being put on "pause" and said it could be restarted in future.
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-10-10 08:32:42
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Milamber said: »
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-34494856
This little tidbit buried in the bottom...
Quote:
In another development on Friday, the US announced it would end efforts to train new Syrian rebel forces and instead shift to providing equipment and weapons to existing forces.
Its $500m (£326m) programme had aimed to train and equip 5,400 fighters this year and a further 15,000 in 2016.
However, it emerged last month that only four or five of the fighters were in Syria.
It was also revealed that US-trained rebels had handed vehicles and ammunition over to militants.
A senior administration official said the programme was being put on "pause" and said it could be restarted in future.

I am surprised the ineptitude of President Obama's strategy was mentioned at all.

"Uhhhh, let me clear. Uhhhhh Assad must go and uhhhhh these five guys are going to uhhhh do it."
[+]
 Phoenix.Amandarius
Offline
Server: Phoenix
Game: FFXI
Posts: 3686
By Phoenix.Amandarius 2015-10-10 08:40:31
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Caitsith.Shiroi said: »
Ragnarok.Nausi said: »
You're not arguing against the effectiveness of an armed citizenry, you're making an argument for pacifism during occupation. "Don't resist, just do what they say and we'll be better off"

If you don't have an army, you are better off not resisting. Unless you really want to die.

If you have an army, but no chance of winning and nobody is going to help you, they are stupid to even resist.

This is about the pussiest thing I ever read in the P&R thread. This is why I can easily see Europe being a caliphate in 30 years. Italy will fall in a day. France, 3 days. All of Europe will get taken over by 50,000 ISIS troops.
[+]
VIP
Offline
Posts: 12259
By Jassik 2015-10-10 12:46:37
Link | Quote | Reply
 
As expected, the GoP witch hunt for planned parenthood turned up no wrong doing. I'm sure it won't matter to the more extreme elements who will take the lapse in leadership as an opportunity to distance themselves even further from the sensible right in the coming debt ceiling and budget debacles.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-10-10 13:23:47
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I'm sure they will still form a committee that will end up revealing no new information and the result will be no action is taken.
Offline
Posts: 42645
By Jetackuu 2015-10-10 14:29:16
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Maybe they'll waste years and a *** of money doing it like the whole "Benghazi investigation." Can we start suing them for wasting our money for political ***?
VIP
Offline
Posts: 12259
By Jassik 2015-10-10 14:30:19
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Maybe they'll waste years and a *** of money doing it like the whole "Benghazi investigation." Can we start suing them for wasting our money for political ***?

Just start taking it out of the military contractor budget.
Offline
Posts: 42645
By Jetackuu 2015-10-10 14:34:03
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jassik said: »
Jetackuu said: »
Maybe they'll waste years and a *** of money doing it like the whole "Benghazi investigation." Can we start suing them for wasting our money for political ***?

Just start taking it out of the military contractor budget.

That's a no-go Jim.
[+]
 Bahamut.Baconwrap
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 5381
By Bahamut.Baconwrap 2015-10-11 21:17:22
Link | Quote | Reply
 
So the ads have already started airing against Sanders. Ironically not from Hillary's camp!

YouTube Video Placeholder
VIP
Offline
Posts: 12259
By Jassik 2015-10-11 21:19:18
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I think that will only help him even among liberals and progressives aside from the very fringe.
 Bahamut.Baconwrap
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 5381
By Bahamut.Baconwrap 2015-10-11 21:28:00
Link | Quote | Reply
 
I think it's hurting him especially with that shooting in Oregon still being a central political discussion for many.
Offline
Posts: 42645
By Jetackuu 2015-10-11 21:29:48
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Yeah, now if he'd only stop trying to redo a ban on "herp derp assault weapons" if he stuck to the rest of his platform he'd be fine.

hell I don't even fully agree with the big anti-military funding stance, but I'll admit that comes with a good bit of bias.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-10-11 21:33:07
Link | Quote | Reply
 
The NRA supported him in 1990 just out of sheer spite for his anti-gun opponent. Their ads basically went: "Even the socialist is better than this guy." Since then they have supported his opponent in every election. That ad won't hurt him at all.
Offline
Posts: 42645
By Jetackuu 2015-10-11 21:34:24
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
The NRA supported him in 1990 just out of sheer spite for his anti-gun opponent. Their ads basically went: "Even the socialist is better than this guy." Since then they have supported his opponent in every election. That ad won't hurt him at all.

It potentially could with minority voters, but as he's struggling with those anyway...
VIP
Offline
Posts: 12259
By Jassik 2015-10-11 21:45:04
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jetackuu said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
The NRA supported him in 1990 just out of sheer spite for his anti-gun opponent. Their ads basically went: "Even the socialist is better than this guy." Since then they have supported his opponent in every election. That ad won't hurt him at all.

It potentially could with minority voters, but as he's struggling with those anyway...

They don't like him because he's trying to give away their entitlements to everyone! /obvious sarcasm
[+]
 Bahamut.Baconwrap
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 5381
By Bahamut.Baconwrap 2015-10-11 21:51:35
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
The NRA supported him in 1990 just out of sheer spite for his anti-gun opponent. Their ads basically went: "Even the socialist is better than this guy." Since then they have supported his opponent in every election. That ad won't hurt him at all.

Vermont is a state known for gun-owners and hunting. He didn't keep his state senate position being anti-gun.
 Shiva.Viciousss
Offline
Server: Shiva
Game: FFXI
user: Viciouss
Posts: 8022
By Shiva.Viciousss 2015-10-11 21:59:29
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Well it sure looks like he did.
VIP
Offline
Posts: 12259
By Jassik 2015-10-11 22:00:17
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Baconwrap said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
The NRA supported him in 1990 just out of sheer spite for his anti-gun opponent. Their ads basically went: "Even the socialist is better than this guy." Since then they have supported his opponent in every election. That ad won't hurt him at all.

Vermont is a state known for gun-owners and hunting. He didn't keep his state senate position being anti-gun.

Seeing as I can't find any public comments about guns, it's quite possible he doesn't have a strong position one way or just chooses to keep his personal opinion to himself.
 Bahamut.Baconwrap
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 5381
By Bahamut.Baconwrap 2015-10-11 22:48:45
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Well it sure looks like he did.

I don't consider supporting PLCAA in 2005 as anti-gun.

"Gun Nut" Bernie Sanders Votes Harm the Sandy Hook Families

Quote:
Their words, not mine. Look at his NRA voting record according to Slate:

During his time in Congress, Sanders opposed several moderate gun control bills. He also supported the most odious NRA–backed law in recent memory—one that may block Sandy Hook families from winning a lawsuit against the manufacturer of the gun used to massacre their children.
VOTED AGAINST BRADY ACT
In 1993, then-Rep. Sanders voted against the Brady Act, which mandated federal background checks for gun purchasers and restricted felons’ access to firearms.
VOTED TO ALLOW GUNS ON TRAINS
As a senator, Sanders supported bills to allow firearms in checked bags on Amtrak trains.
BLOCK FUNDING TO EVEN FOREIGN AID ORGANIZATIONS THAT REGISTERED GUNS
Blocked funding to any foreign aid organization that registered or taxed Americans’ guns.
INSULTED THE SANDY HOOK FAMILIES WITH THIS IGNORANCE
Sanders is dubious that gun control could help prevent gun violence, telling one interviewer after Sandy Hook that “if you passed the strongest gun control legislation tomorrow, I don’t think it will have a profound effect on the tragedies we have seen.” (He has since endorsed some modest gun control measures.)

SANDERS HORRIBLE VOTE TO SUPPORT GUN DEALERS AND MANUFACTURERS
Sanders’ vote for a different kind of pro-gun bill is more puzzling—and profoundly disturbing. In 2005, a Republican-dominated Congress passed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA). This law doesn’t protect gun owners; it protects gun manufacturers, distributors, dealers, and importers. The PLCAA was the No. 1 legislative priority of the National Rifle Association for years, because it shields gun makers and dealers from most liability when their firearms are used criminally. It is one of the most noxious pieces of pro-gun legislation ever passed. And Bernie Sanders voted for it. (Sanders’ campaign has not replied to a request for comment.)
THE HORRIBLE EFFECT OF BERNIE'S DISGRACEFUL VOTES
Before the PLCAA, most states imposed some form of tort liability on gun makers and sellers. If a gun manufacturer made an assault rifle that could slaughter dozens of people in a few seconds, for instance, one of its victims might sue the company for negligently making a gun that could foreseeably be used for mass murder. If a gun seller sold a gun to a customer without performing any kind of background check—and then the buyer opened fire on the subway—his victims might sue that seller for negligently providing a gun to a mentally unstable person. The standards in each state differed, but the bottom line remained the same: Victims of gun violence and their families could recover financially from the people and companies who negligently enabled gun violence.
The PLCAA changed all that. Remarkably, the act wiped out gun liability laws in all 50 states, rendering them invalid except for a handful of narrow exceptions. (So much for states’ rights.) Thanks to the law, victims of mass shootings are barred from suing the companies that produced a wartime weapon that no civilian could ever need. With few exceptions, victims cannot sue a gun seller for negligently providing a semiautomatic weapon to a lunatic who shoots them in a movie theater. Even if a jury decides a gun maker or seller should be liable, the PLCAA invalidates its verdict. The law tramples upon states’ rights, juries’ rights, and fundamental precepts of America’s civil justice system. And it received Bernie Sanders’ support—in both 2003 (when it was first introduced) and 2005 (when it finally passed).

Bernie's record on guns is so right-wing that the wingnut Daily Caller wrote this about him: "Bernie Sanders, Second Amendment Socialist?" They captured this statement from Bernie:
“If you passed the strongest gun control legislation tomorrow, I don’t think it will have a profound effect on the tragedies we have seen,” Sanders told a liberal Vermont outlet after the Sandy Hook shootings. http://dailycaller.com/...
Really?
What is Bernie Sanders?

Seriously.

I would love to hear some of his supporters defend this record.
VIP
Offline
Posts: 12259
By Jassik 2015-10-11 22:52:47
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Baconwrap said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Well it sure looks like he did.

I don't consider supporting PLCAA in 2005 as anti-gun.

Insulating gun manufacturers against liability for people misusing their product only makes sense. It would be like allowing people to sue Ford if someone ran a F-150 through a carnival. What that has to do with Sandy Hook, I have no idea, but if you want to hold someone responsible for shootings, make it the person who made a gun available to the shooter.

I don't get why that's pro-gun, I'm not exactly a big gun rights person and I PLCAA as pro-common-sense.
 Bahamut.Baconwrap
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 5381
By Bahamut.Baconwrap 2015-10-11 23:55:43
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Jassik said: »
Bahamut.Baconwrap said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Well it sure looks like he did.

I don't consider supporting PLCAA in 2005 as anti-gun.

Insulating gun manufacturers against liability for people misusing their product only makes sense. It would be like allowing people to sue Ford if someone ran a F-150 through a carnival. What that has to do with Sandy Hook, I have no idea, but if you want to hold someone responsible for shootings, make it the person who made a gun available to the shooter.

I don't get why that's pro-gun, I'm not exactly a big gun rights person and I PLCAA as pro-common-sense.
'

It's also like suing Ford because i got into an accident due to my the accelerator on my car malfunctioning.
VIP
Offline
Posts: 12259
By Jassik 2015-10-12 00:09:33
Link | Quote | Reply
 
Bahamut.Baconwrap said: »
Jassik said: »
Bahamut.Baconwrap said: »
Shiva.Viciousss said: »
Well it sure looks like he did.

I don't consider supporting PLCAA in 2005 as anti-gun.

Insulating gun manufacturers against liability for people misusing their product only makes sense. It would be like allowing people to sue Ford if someone ran a F-150 through a carnival. What that has to do with Sandy Hook, I have no idea, but if you want to hold someone responsible for shootings, make it the person who made a gun available to the shooter.

I don't get why that's pro-gun, I'm not exactly a big gun rights person and I PLCAA as pro-common-sense.
'

It's also like suing Ford because i got into an accident due to my the accelerator on my car malfunctioning.

If the gun manufacturers and retailers were aware of and attempted to hide a defect that would cause a gun to leap from your holster and take aim at innocent bystanders, you'd have a parallel. Design all kinds of liability into gun laws, as long as they make some kind of sense, I'm all for it. PLCAA was on the right track, and saying someone who voted for it is a gun nut is just emotional BS.
 Bahamut.Baconwrap
Offline
Server: Bahamut
Game: FFXI
Posts: 5381
By Bahamut.Baconwrap 2015-10-12 00:20:08
Link | Quote | Reply
 
PLCAA completely prevents gun-manufactures from negligence liability. That includes selling weapons in certain areas. Selling a gun in Vermont isn't the same as selling a gun in Chicago or LA. They aren't getting used for the same purpose.

More importantly it creates unique protections for the gun industry. No other industry in the country has such unique protections. Why do gun manufactures deserve such privilege?
First Page 2 3 ... 1020 1021 1022 ... 1375 1376 1377